Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reducing uncertainty and providing information for decision makers in the public arena As systematic evaluation of the technical and economic feasibility and political viability of alternative policies, strategies for implementation, and consequences for policy adoption
Ex-Ante
(rational model)
Ex-Post
(program evaluation)
evaluation
future states
projecting
evaluation
its objective?
Was
politically acceptable?
Research is more an art than a science. Discovering the important facts, sorting out superfluous information, and assembling the best sources requires knowledge, creativity, and a bit of luck. Although its impossible to create a simple how-to list to the steps to faultless policy research, certain core principles guide the most effective legislative research. Black, p. 14
RESEARCH PLAN
Problem definition
RESEARCH PLAN
Background research
legislative history
political environment previous policy efforts other relevant information
RESEARCH PLAN
Research design
RESEARCH PLAN
Research implementation
Step 1:
Problem Definition
Problem Definition
Policy problem:
a meaningful definition of the problem and proposed policy solution so that it is amenable to systematic research
Analysts problem:
recasting the problem situation into practical, manageable, and actionable framework for analysis
Complex problems with many facets Definition changes as you investigate the problem
Background
Violent crime involving weapons on public school property has been increasing at an alarming rate during the past 10 years.
Would installing metal detectors at school entrances contribute to reducing violent crime on school property?
Policy problem
Expresses the problem in a meaningful way Eliminates irrelevant issues and information
Step 2:
Background Information
Legislative History
Local
County
State
Federal
Courts
Political Environment
Taking into consideration information about Policy Actors or people and groups in the Policy Space during the design
Actors/action groups
Motivations
Beliefs
Resources
Location
An interest group is any group that is based on one or more shared attitudes and makes certain claims upon other groups or organizations in society for the establishment, maintenance, or enhancement of forms of behavior that are implied by the shared attitudes.
Evaluate the policy from both the expanders and detractors point of view in term of:
Step 3:
Research Design
and concise statement of intent of the analysis following the outline in the analysts problem statement of evaluative criteria for judging results of the analysis
Establishment
What have the trends been in violent crimes on school property during the past decade? Where are these crimes committed geographically? What type of crimes are committed? Who commits these crimes? When are they committed? What type of weapons are used on school property? How are the weapons entering schools? How have other school districts dealt with the problem?
Measures, rules, and standards of judgement used to guide decision making Criteria: specific statements about dimensions of the problem that will be used to evaluate alternative policies or programs
Costs of policy
data do you need to answer the analysts questions? Where will you obtain this information?
C. Methods to be used
How will the data be structured? What type of comparisons will be made? How will you evaluate your results? How will results be quantified and compared? What type of conclusions will be drawn?
Remember to always.
Identify existing alternative policies or programs
Remember to always.
Evaluate alternative policies or programs in the same way you evaluate the policy problem
Step 4:
Research Results and Analysis
A. Reporting Results
structured logical clear factually
correct
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr East West North
based
logically
alternatives
C. Cost-benefit analysis
Property devaluation in school district Students skip school to avoid detection/because they cant protect themselves
Implementation problems
Step 5. Conclusions
Conclusions
Regarding
Step 6:
Recommendations
Practical example
California Ignition Interlock Pilot Program
Step 1:
Problem Definition
previous convictions
High-tech device installed in a car which prevents operation of the car if person driving has a breath alcohol level of a certain specified level
Problem
Would
the II System be an effective sentencing option in reducing recidivism in the case of DUI convictions?
What are the characteristics of recidivists? What are the statistics on recidivism in CA? How effective is the II System in reducing recidivism? How much does it cost to implement? How easy would it be to implement as a sentencing option? How would judges react to the new policy? How would DUI offenders react to this policy?
Californias
II Pilot Program
The Farr-Davis Driver Safety Act of 1986 made California the first state in the nation to pass legislation authorizing the use of ignition interlock devices as a condition of DUI probation. The law also authorized the California Office of Traffic Safety to plan and administer a pilot program in four representative counties to test the effectiveness of the devices in reducing DUI recidivism, and to provide information on its implementation.
Objectives
To design an experiment to test the effectiveness of the II System as a sentencing option in reducing recidivism To conduct background research on the phenomenon of recidivism (time, occurrence) To undertake interviews with stakeholders to assess their perceptions of the sentencing option
Sentenced to II program
Recidivates
No further offences
Recidivates
No further offences
Evaluative Criteria
Informational Needs
Characteristics of the samples (demographic, arrest records, blood alcohol levels at conviction, etc) Data from II Systems device Court data Interviews with stakeholders (judges, convicted individuals, etc.)
Step 4.
Research Results and Analysis
-----------------------------------------------------------------Alameda San Diego Sonoma 17.7% 11.2% 15.4% 8.2% 18.4% 27.7%
46
40 22 25 22 12
Projected Actual
Sonoma
Judicial bias in sentencing Resistance by judges Affordability of devices Ownership of cars Bypassing II devices Borrowing the cars of others
Step 5. Conclusions
Step 6. Recommendations
California passed legislation extending authority for using the II System device throughout the state as a DUI probation option
Step 1:
Problem Definition
Background Information:
Approximately half of all high school students report having sex More than one in five students report having had four or more sexual partners by the
One quarter of sexually active adolescents nationwide have an STD Many STDs are lifelong viral infections with no cure
choice, My Future!
VA
Powhatan, Miami,
ReCapturing
the Vision
FL
Families
WI MS
Teens
in Control Group
Clarksdale,
Problem
abstinence education programs reduce adolescent sexual behavior and promote healthy behavior among teens?
Do the programs have an impact on teen abstinence? Do the programs have an impact on teen pregnancy rates? Do the programs reduce teen risky sexual behavior? Do the programs reduce the risk of STDs? How do the programs impact knowledge of risky behavior and STDs? Are abstinence education programs more effective than comprehensive sexual education programs in reducing these behaviors?
1996
Title
V, Section 510
Objectives
Conduct a multiyear, rigorous, experimentally-based impact evaluation of four abstinence education programs around the country. Estimate the effect of abstinence education programs on:
Teen sexual abstinence Teen pregnancy Age at first intercourse Rates of unprotected sex Number of sexual partners Related knowledge outcomes
Four surveys: baseline/program start, three follow-up surveys spanning 42 -78 months
Outcomes
Outcomes
Criteria
in terms of
Effectiveness
outcomes
Informational
Needs
Characteristics
Step 4.
Research Results and Analysis
Abstinence
Step 5. Conclusions
Conclusions
None of the programs had statistically significant impacts on the rate of sexual abstinence No differences in the number of sexual partners once sexual activity was initiated No affect on age at which sexual activity was initiated No difference in rate of unprotected sex No difference in rate of teen pregnancy Statistically significant difference in ability to correctly identify true STDs
Step 6. Recommendations