Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Breakfast Seminar:
Torys LLP
Supply Content
Credit
Chain Mgmt
Services
Payments
70,000
CRM Services
1%
Billing 1% 60,000
2%
4% CRM
6%
Insurance 50,000
Finance & Accounting
35% Services
6%
40,000
Card Market Size Supply Management
Services
Services 7%
30,000
HR Services Payment
Services
20,000
Card Processing
16% Insurance Services Billing and Clearing
Services
10,000 Services
HR Content Management
Credit Services Services
22% 0
0 8 10 12 14 16 18
F&A
2005 – 2008 % CAGR
2007 BPO Delivery Destination • India remains a destination of choice for BPO services, especially back-office and KPO
services; For sales and service India is no longer is a preferred destination
– In 2008, size of Indian BPO Market = $10.9B; estimated to employ 700,000
• Canada as a near-shore destination continues to diminish as its currency has
strengthened and higher adoption of offshore locations
• Philippines continues to grow as a preferred destination due to better cultural alignment
with North America. Today it is the #1 destination for voice based services
• Eastern Europe is emerging rapidly especially as an alternative to service Europe
• KPO and judgment based work continues to grow rapidly but requires domain
expertise. Investment in platforms continue to accelerate. The number of Indian KPO
professionals is set to leap from 75,000 in 2006 to 250,000 employees by 2010
HR
Management
3%
F&A
22%
Customer
Support
44%
March 20, 2009 12
Global CRM Outsourcing Market
2008 Global CRM Market Agent Positions 2006-2012 Regional Break-out of Agent Positions
• The global market for customer care will continue to grow through the coming five years, increasing from approximately 650,000 agent positions (APs) in
2008 to nearly 780,000 by 2012 with a CAGR of 4.7% from 2008-2012
– Principal growth occurring in APAC and EMEA. APAC and EMEA will collectively constitute 55% of this market by 2012, up from 46% in 2006
– North American customer care market will diminish (i) proportionately relative to other regions, and (ii) in AP terms - due to growth in North
American companies adopting offshoring as well as increasing adoption of self-service solutions which further reduces the need for domestic
customer care APs
• Financial services, manufacturing and Telco clients will remain the majority of outsourced contact center users, accounting for ~70% share
– The dominance of these three verticals, in the proportion of APs, will remain till 2012
– In NA, the retail sector is also expected to increase its share of outsourced APs through this period. Among emerging sectors, public sector and
health care are slated for expansion
• In 2003, the revenues generated from global KPO Industry stood at US$1.2 Billion and has doubled to $3.05 billion in 2007.
• According to the NASSCOM and Evalueserve, this is expected to grow from $1.2 billion in 2003 to $17 billion by 2010 at a CAGR of around 46%
• India is expected to capture 70% of this market, translating to a market size of U$12 billion
• The number of Indian KPO professionals is set to leap from 75,000 in 2006 to 250,000 employees by 2010
• Increase pressure to grow top-line due to credit crunch • Consolidation of providers – larger offshore/global players acquiring
• Liquidity issues in sectors such as BFSI and Auto smaller/niche providers in order to
• Pressure of reducing costs resulting in • Increase suite of offerings (e.g. TCS - Eserve)
• Re-evaluating what is core and non-core • Increase geographic footprint (e.g. Transworks - Minacs deal
• Increase in automation and reduced dependence on human resources to have delivery in North America, Europe and Asia)
• Move towards people agnostic pricing models: transaction based pricing
• Exploring alternate delivery locations • Gain-sharing models: influencing top-line through outsourcing deals or
• Re-assessment of payment terms sharing productivity gains
• Increased M&A activities causing • Increase in service offering – new services such as KPO, Legal Process
• Integration challenges Outsourcing, etc.
• Redundancy even in core/ front-line resources
• Employee / privacy laws being made increasingly stringent
• Focused on reducing number of suppliers vs. adding new
• Decrease in transaction volumes impacting margins • Increase in overall outsourcing by clients especially in the BFSI space
• Potential credit risk and risk of recovery of payments • Expectation of more integrated offerings from providers
• Customers define all the process requirements and specific performance metrics to a great detail
• Retain ability to create new service levels to address uncovered areas or new business requirements
• Include complex performance based service credits to protect business performance
• Seek account team continuity and impose workforce turnover limitations to retain knowledge base and quality of service
• Try to own all IP – customer developed, vendor developer or co-developed. Seek transfer of software ownership rights upon development, rather than delivery or payment –
protect software WIP
• Include obligations on the supplier to provide and maintain a plan for dealing with the termination of the contract, and the transition from one vendor to another
• Seek provisions relating to step-in to allow for the customer, or a third party on behalf of the customer, to take over the services for a period of time or terminate services in
case of a disruption to or deterioration of the services
• Right to multiple audits to detect and correct supplier performance, supplier financial stability or even maintain favorable terms
• Customers want
– To ensure complete control over operations
– Transfer all the risk to the supplier
– Have multiple remedies to resort to in the event of a default
• In short seek total protection!
• Suppliers would like to have
– Longer term contracts with high barriers to exit
– Minimal performance risks
– No performance improvement obligations
– Annual inflation linked price increases
The adversarial relationship begins!
• Interdependent
– Both need each other to grow and prosper
– Not a zero sum game - Success is mutual and failure is collective
– Needs aligned goals
• Scope, scale and nature of service evolve over the relationship
– This cannot be predicted upfront and contracts should have the flexibility to allow this evolution
• Allocate risks and responsibilities to allow both parties to perform, especially when things go wrong