Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Entrepreneur
is ethical and what is not often is not obvious. Situations regarding ethical issues are often ambiguous.
Entrepreneurial Ethics
Ethics: the guidelines or rules of conduct we aim to live by; a system or set of moral principles. Most business decisions involve some degree of ethical judgement. The ethical standards of a new venture founder or a business are judged by actions, not by pious statements of intent.
Unethical Behavior
Why do normally honest, intelligent, compassionate business founders and entrepreneurial managers act in unethical ways that are dishonest, wrongheaded, and often illegal?
Real ethical dilemmas are ambiguous, and many of us are likely to hike right through them, unaware that they exist. When, usually after the fact, someone makes an issue of one, we tend to resent his or her bringing it up. Often, when the full import of what we have done (or not done) hits us, we dig into a defensive position from which it is very difficult to emerge. In rare circumstances, we may contemplate what we have done From The Parable of the Sadhu
Rationalization #1
A belief that the activity is within reasonable ethical and legal limits - that is, that it is not really unethical or illegal.
Where is the line between profit maximization and unethical/illegal conduct? Founders/entrepreneurial managers sometimes leave the impression that there are things that they dont want to know about.
Rationalization #1
The difference between becoming a success and becoming a statistic lies in knowing where the ethical line is. Successful venture founders know that there is a difference between taking risks, and knowing which risks to take. Maximizing profits is a new ventures second priority, not its first. The first is ensuring its survival.
Rationalization #1
The smartest venture managers know that the best answer to the question, How far is too far? is dont try to find out !!!
Rationalization #2
A belief that the activity is in the individuals or ventures best interests that the individual would somehow be expected to undertake the activity.
All new ventures need to do whatever is expedient to survive. I have the right to do this, after all, I am the founder of this venture.
Rationalization #2
This ethical dilemma nearly always results from a limited, narrow-minded view of what those interests (individual or venture) are. The real interests of the venture (and its founders) are served by ethical, honest conduct in the first place. Venture managers need to be concerned with more than just results, they need to look hard at how these results are obtained.
Rationalization #3
A belief that the activity is safe because it will never be found out or publicized; the classic crime-and-punishment issue of discovery.
Why do venture managers/employees believe that they wont get caught? What is the role of investors, professional advisors, and boards of advisors in guiding a ventures ethical conduct?
Rationalization #3
Discovery - the process in which a plaintiffs attorneys can comb through a companys records to look for incriminating evidence. The most effective deterrent is to heighten the perceived probability of being caught in the first place. The point is to prevent misconduct, not just catch it.
Rationalization #3
As the main deterrent to unethical behavior or illegal conduct is the perceived probability of detection, venture managers should announce any misconduct and how the individuals were punished (within legal HR limits).
Rationalization #4
A belief that because the activity helps the venture, the venture (and its managers) will condone it, and even protect the person who engages in it.
How do founders/venture managers keep loyalty from going berserk? How does a venture founder harness the passion to succeed short of unethical/illegal behavior?
Rationalization #4
Venture founders have the right and the responsibility to exert a moral force within the business. Venture founders/managers are responsible for clearly delineating between passion and loyalty, and actions that are unethical and illegal. This has to be done well in advance, ideally as part of the founding principles of the venture.
Rationalization #4
As this line can become obscured in the heat of the moment, the ethical line needs to be drawn well short of where reasonable men and women could even begin to wonder about the ethical and legal consequences of their actions.
4 Rationalizations Summary
Believing that the activity is not really illegal or unethical. Believing it is in the individuals or new ventures best interest. Believing that the activity or behavior will never be found out. Believing that because it helps the venture, the company and its senior managers will condone it.
Promoter:
Entrepreneurial euphoria Impression management Pragmatic vs. moral considerations
Innovator:
New types of ethical problems Ethic of change
Relationships:
Conflicts of interest and roles Transactional ethics Guerilla tactics
Other dilemmas:
Finders-keepers ethic Conflict between personal values and business goals Unsavory industry practices