Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RESEARCH PROBLEM
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING PROBLEMS SIGNIFICANCE DESCRIPTION AND STATEMENT PROBLEM ANALYSIS PROCEDURES EVALUATION OF A PROBLEM - PERSONAL AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS COMMON MISTAKES IN PROBLEM FORMULATION
4 1
IDENTIFICATION OF RESEARCH ISSUE/QUESTIONS
2
FOPRMULATION OF RESEARCH PROBLEMS
3
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
EXPLORATORY
CAUSAL
FIELD EXPERIMENTS
SECONDARY DATA
Research Issue
Research Question
Research Problem
MICRO LEVEL Issues in the Industry Specific Environment Issues in the Organizations Specific Environment
- Education level, quality - Lifestyle change, rate of social change, family values - Psychographic customer behaviour, preferences, attitude and perceptions - Demographic trends
- Law & Regulations Jurisdiction, Legislative, Administrative (Impact, Revision and Constituency)
- Lobbying/Legislative Influence Jurisdiction, Legislative, Administrative (Impact, Revision and Constituency)
MICRO LEVEL
1. INDUSTRY SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENT ISSUES
EG. SERVICE INDUSTRY BANKING, HOTEL MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AGRICULTURAL AND FISHING MINING
Long-term plans and policies that determine or change the character of an organization a. Policy Research Analysis of overall organizations situation with a view of formulating major policy proposals and establishing their priorities.
Measures: Critical elements of economic,
sociocultural political, technological and ecological changes having potential impact on the organization.
b. Evaluation Research
Formal, objective Measurement on the extent to which given action, activity or program has achieved its objectives.
2. MANAGERIAL LEVEL Those actions associated with ongoing management of the organization which are carried on within the limits of the objectives and policies defined at the strategic level.
a. Managerial Research Research related to a specific problem of limited scope in which management has the need of additional information on which to base a decision.
b. Action Research
Continuous gathering and analysis of research data and relying of the findings into the organization for the purpose of improving the organizations functions.
c.
Technical Research
Specific transactions involved in carrying out the tasks required to achieve a variety of objectives defined at the managerial level.
d.
Operational Research
A range of quantitative/analytical techniques designed to formulate and test decision rules which will permit management to optimize the relations between inputs and outputs of a given operational procedure.
- Question may be in the form of a hypotheses that certain relationships exist among variables, or it may be of an exploratory nature, essentially asking What is the relationship among variables. - It may begin in a closely formulated form, but must eventually be stated such that a testable hypothesis or model is generated.
The first question that is always asked is How Do I find a Research Problem There are no set rules for locating a research problem, but the 3 major sources are: 1. 2. 3. Deduction from theory Experience Related Literature
often far more essential than its solution. To raise new questions, new possibilities, or to regard old problems from a new angle, requires creative imagination and marks rela advances in knowledge.
Einstein and Infeld (1938)
Carrying out a research investigation requires careful planning. Central to a research investigation is a clear-cut statement of the research problem. A question well-stated is a question half-answered
1. The problem should be one whose solution will make a contribution to the body of organized knowledge in the field of interest. 2. The problem should be one that will lead to new problems and to further research 3. The problem must be one that is researchable 4. The problem must be suitable for the particular researcher 5. Select a problem that is specific, simple and clear.
1. State of basic difficulty or problem situation significance and importance of the problem area. 2. Careful analysis of known and suspected facts, and explanation of existing information and knowledge that may have some bearing on problem. 3. Soundness of the logic underlying selection of variables or factors to be studied and expression of their relationship to the problem area. 4. Systematic and orderly presentation of the interrelationships of relevant facts and concepts underlying the problem.
5.
Clear identification of the problem statement through use of appropriate heading or paragraph caption.
Succinct, precise, and unambiguous statement of the research problem (including the delineation of independent, dependent, and other variables), of the major questions to be resolved, or of the objectives to be investigated. Distinction (if any) between the problems or questions that are either factually oriented or value oriented.
6.
7.
Sufficient delimitation of the problem area - narrowing of the scope without becoming concerned with a trivial problem.
PROBLEM ANALYSIS PROCEDURES 1. Select a problem that engages your attention and begs for a solution
2. Accumulate the facts that might be related to the problem. 3. Settle by observation whether the facts are relevant
4. Trace any relationships between facts that might reveal the key to the difficulty. 5. Propose various explanations (hypotheses) for the cause of the difficulty.
6. Ascertain through observation and analysis whether they are relevant to the problem. 7. Trace the relationships between explanations that may give an insight into the problem solution. 8. Trace the relationships between facts and explanations. 9. Questions assumptions underlying the analysis of the problem.
EVALUATION OF A PROBLEM
PERSONAL CONSIDERATIONS
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Is the problem in line with my goal expectations and the expectations of others. Am I genuinely interested in this problem, but free from strong biases? Do I posses or can I acquire the necessary skills, abilities, and background knowledge to study this problem? Do I have access to the tools, equipment, laboratories, and subjects necessary to conduct the investigation? Do I have the time and money to complete it? Can I obtain the adequate data? Does the problem meet the scope, significance, and topical requirements of the institution or periodical to which I will submit my report? Can I obtain administrative support, guidance, and cooperation for the conduct of the study?
8.
SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Will the solution of this problem advance knowledge in the field appreciably? Will the findings be of practical value to educators, parents, social workers or others? What will be the breadth of the application of the findings in terms of range of individuals, years of applicability, and areas of coverage? Will the investigation duplicate the work that has been or is being done adequately by someone else? If this topic has been covered, does it need to be extended beyond its present limits? Is the topic sufficiently delimited to permit an exhaustive treatment yet sufficiently significant to warrant investigating it? Will the conclusions of the study be of doubtful value because the tools and techniques available to conduct the inquiry are not adequately refined and sufficiently reliable? Will the study lead to the development of other investigations?
8.
4. 5.
6.
Failure to base research on a sound theoretical or conceptual framework, which would tie together the divergent masses of research into a systematic and comparative scheme, providing feedback and evaluation for theory.
Failure to make explicit and clear the underlying assumptions within your research so that it can be evaluated in terms of these foundations. Failure to recognize the limitations in your approach, implied or explicit, that place restrictions on the conclusions and how they apply to other situations. Failure to anticipate alternative rival hypotheses that would also account for a given set of findings and which challenge the interpretations and conclusions reached by the investigator.
7.
8.
9.
1.4
RESEARCH PROBLEMS: Statement of the problem situations, basic difficulty/area of concern or felt needs, delineation of the research questions.
STATEMENT OF HYPOTHESES: Explication of relationships among variables or comparisons to be considered, direction of relationships. THEORETICAL UNDERPINNING: Background/foundations of the study/academic discipline(s) upon which the study/enquiry is built. STUDY FRAMEWORK: Rationale and theoretical framework, conceptual or substantive assumptions indicating relationships among variables, definition of terms, variables Operationalization. SUMMARY: Outline of the remainder of the research proposal.
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
ASSIGNMENT 1:
1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE RESEARCH TITLE 2. IDENTIFICATION OF THE RESEARCH ISSUE 3. IDENTIFICATION OF THE RESEARCH QUESTIONS