Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agenda
Review of Group Dynamics and Teams The Power of Leadership: The Milgram Experiments
Announcements
Basking in reflected glory Feelings about the self are influenced by group affiliation In-group favouritism Tendency to view your own group and its members positively and other groups and their members negatively Out-group homogeneity The tendency to perceive members of 4 other groups as very similar to each other
Conformity Surprisingly high Reduced by the presence of an ally Social loafing Slacking off when working with others Stereotype threat Individuals perform more poorly on a task when a relevant negative stereotype is salient
5
Agenda
Review of Group Dynamics and Teams The Power of Leadership: The Milgram Experiments
Procedure Study on memory and learning Other participant is a 47 year-old man Random drawing gives you the role of teacher, and the man is the learner
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.
The teacher helps the learner remember word pairs Blue Box Nice Day The teacher is required to administer a shock to the learner when he makes mistakes because the study is designed to explore the effects of punishment on learning Participants were free to leave anytime
Shock generator: 15-450 volts Labels range from Slight Shock to Danger: Severe Shock to XXX
10
11
120: Ugh! Hey, this really hurts. 150: Ugh!! Experimenter! Thats all. Get me out of here. I told you I had heart trouble. My hearts starting to bother me now. Get me out of here, please 210: Ugh!!! Experimenter! Get me out of here. Ive had enough. I wont be in the experiment any more. 270: (Agonized scream) Let me out of here! (x6) 285: (Agonized scream)
12
300: (Agonized scream) I absolutely refuse to answer any more. Get me out of here. You cant hold me here 315: (Intensely agonized scream) I told you I refuse to answer. Im no longer part of this experiment. 330: (Intense and prolonged agonized scream) Let me out of here (x2). My hearts bothering me (hysterically) Let me out of here (x2). You have no right to hold me here. Let me out (x6)! After 330: (Silence, refuses to answer word-pair questions)
13
14
15
Predictions
Experts thought only 1-3% of participants would keep going to the end (only psychopaths) Experts thought that they themselves would never obey
16
17
Results 62.5% of participants obeyed until the end Men and women obeyed to the same extent Similar results across cultures 100% of participants obeyed up to a 100 volt shock (i.e., Intense) Do not worry Modern Ethics Boards would never allow this sort of study to be conducted!
18
62.5% reached 450 volts in the initial study 20% reached 450 volts when the experimenter was replaced by another teacher 10% reached 450 volts when two other teachers refused to continue 2% reached 450 volts when they could choose the level of shock
21
Organizational lessons
To Avoid Being Influenced Be wary of people who insist on using titles Focus on substance above style
A V12 engine sounds nice but evidence and logic are preferable
22
Who becomes a leader? What do leaders do? Transactional leadership v. transformational leadership
24
25