Professional Documents
Culture Documents
When it comes to manipulating the earnings figure, companies do not have to cook the books. The Accounting Standards set by professional bodies provide enough room for what is called creative accounting.
Its not cheating, mind you. Accounting rules, the world over, have many grey areas and hence, companies enjoy some freedom or flexibility in deciding what constitutes revenues and expenses. Such flexibility is certainly welcome considering different business situations and commercial consideration, but companies often take advantage of this flexibility to keep their income statement in good shape. The Accounting Standards offer too many variable methods or choices in accounting for identical transactions. Moreover, nonadherence to standards, norms and rules does not attract that strict a penalty in most countries across the globe India being no exception.
An assortment of techniques is used to doctor the financials. Although an exhaustive list can never be provided for the same, it may be commented that the important among those are as under:
Changing the basis of accounting Altering the timing expenditure [sometimes even revenues] Doctoring the cost estimates Accounting for capital and revenue transactions
However, if the method of accounting is undergoing a change as compared to the immediately preceding previous year, the same needs to be disclosed, explained and quantified in the financial statements. It may be noted that such disclosures are warranted only in the year of change and not in the subsequent years. Therefore, such clauses get buried in the past financial statements and are conveniently forgotten.
The Accounting Standard No 2 [AS 2] on Valuation of Inventories provides different options for inventory valuation, namely, cost may be computed either under the FIFO or Weighted Average method and companies are allowed to shift from a method which incorporates fixed production overheads to a method which excludes it while valuing inventories. These flexibilities in the Accounting Standard provides enough room for Indian companies to tamper with the inventory figure, which has a direct bearing on operating profit, net profit and the balance sheet reflection of the financial position as well.
Depreciation Policy In India, the applicable depreciation rates are those given in the Companies Act in respect of single, double and triple shift working of companies. It may be noted that only minimum wages are mentioned in such regulations and hence, higher rates are not precluded.
Another method of earnings manipulation involves altering the timing of the expenditure and sometimes even revenues as illustrated in the following examples.
In the Indian Income Tax Act, there is a provision which states that if a new fixed asset is used for less than six months in a financial year [even one or two days], full six months depreciation may be claimed on that asset. Thus, fixed assets could be capitalized a little sooner than later in order to gain from tax credits.
Issue of Materials In so many manufacturing companies based in India, a standard practice followed is that whenever raw materials or consumables are issued from main stores to the shop floor, the same is treated as consumption irrespective of the fact whether it has been actually consumed or not. Thus, companies may expedite the issue of materials since such issues would naturally be deducted from the current income line.
Management estimates what portions of their receivables are irrecoverable or what portion of their inventory is obsolete. They tend to maximize write offs in good years and minimize such write offs in bad years. When things go well, there is a tendency on the part of the management to try and provide more than what would normally be required. These extras which reduce the profits, are kept in a corporate barrel. In bad years, the management can draw from the barrel for writing back the extras to supplement and boost reported earnings.
Another area of concern is valuation of work in process inventories. The valuation of such items largely depend on the state of completion of the same, which is also estimated by the company management. Management and Statutory Auditors may sometimes form different judgments on the level of cost estimates but can generally reach on agreement based on the range of acceptable estimates.
The fourth method of bottom line manipulation is through fiddling with segregation of costs into capital expenditure, revenue expenditure and deferred revenue expenses [which are amortized in the books of accounts]. Obviously, any misclassification of revenue expenses into capital expenses or deferred revenue amounts to carry forward of revenue expenditure which in turn would boost the earnings figure. A reverse treatment would deflate the reported earnings as well.
Strengthening Statutory Audit Stressing on cost Audit The Directors Statement Responsibility
Both in the UK and the US, company management are required to indicate the directors responsibilities in their report of the Board of Directors. The Companies Amendment Bill [India] introduces a similar concept known as the Directors Responsibility Statement. Nowadays, such disclosure is an integral component of annual reports of Indian companies.
In the preparation of the annual accounts, the applicable accounting standards have been adhered to. We have selected such accounting policies and applied them consistently and made judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent so as to give a true and fair view of the state of affairs and profits of the company.
We have taken sufficient care for the maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act and for safeguarding the assets of the company. Adequate care has also been taken in preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities.
The financial statement have been prepared on historical cost and on going concern basis.
fine
print,