Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Keep in mind
80% of the proposal process is planning only 20% is writing
Logic Model
Typical parts of the proposal
Basic Principles
1. Your proposal should be
neat clean easy to read in a regular format free of typographical errors free of extravagant packaging
Basic Principles
2. Write in plain English
do not use jargon do not use bureaucratize define your terms have family and friends read the proposal
Basic Principles
3. Make it brief
follow all guidelines make it long enough, but not too long
Basic Principles
4. Be positive
dont beg! you are offering the funding source an opportunity to be part of an important, useful activity dont call attention to your mistakes
Basic Principles
5. Avoid unsupported assumptions such as:
funding source knows about applicant national scope of problem described, but no documentation of its existence in your community given causal relationships between events is presumed, but no evidence of cause and effect given
Basic Principles
6. Include a cover letter, if appropriate
signed by the chairperson of the board of directors or individual in high authority briefly describe the content of the proposal (do not use in place of a summary) may be used to suggest follow up on the proposal
May vary depending upon type of funding source (government vs private) Generally, some type of review board or panel
Logic Model
a tool or visual resource that may help you
lay out your program see your outcomes and determine if they are measurable with evaluation enhancement grants
may be required
No two proposals are going to be the same Generally, a difference between proposals for private funders and proposals for Federal agencies
Summary Introduction or organizational information Problem statement or needs assessment Project description objectives methods staffing/administration evaluation Future or other necessary funding Budget Conclusion
be at the beginning (but written last) be clear, concise, and interesting identify the applicant and the applicants credibility outline the reason for the grant request state the objectives describe activities to accomplish objectives show costs, funds committed, and amount requested be brief
when, how, and why organization was started statement of purpose, goals, and philosophy significant events in your history prior and current activities accomplishments and impacts size and characteristics of your clientele assistance asked of you by other organizations your funding sources/positive comments results of evaluation of your programs
The most critical part of your plan The reason behind the proposal Generally, should focus on the conditions you wish to change
clearly related to the purposes and goals of organization supported by evidence drawn from your experience
statistics testimony
are outcomes of your activities, not the activities themselves methods are how you are going to get there
if measurable -may be the criteria by which you judge the effectiveness of your program
should
be understandable rationale for chosen methods
may include
selection of staff staff training explanation selection of participants
May be integrated into methods section or you may choose to separate it into its own section
Why do it?
required by funding source doing your own reduces chances of them doing it forces you to really think about your program allows others to make decisions about the program motivation of clients reassures funding sources and potential sources can be a powerful tool
Few granting sources want to adopt you for all time Where will you find funding to continue the program?
equipment
cost of training for users maintenance insurance
Cover letter or face sheet (SF-424) Budget forms/line item budget (Budget Justification) Table of contents Abstract (similar to the summary)
(cont)
Narrative meeting the purposes of the authorizing statute extent of need for the project plan of operation quality of key personnel budget and cost effectiveness evaluation plan adequacy of resources Appendices Certifications
Directions are not followed Unfocused or Untargeted Proposal Recycled, Generic, Proposal Poor Planning and Lack of Detail Unclear or Overly Complex Proposal Unsupported Claims Poor Writing and Organization