Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anca Metiu
ESSEC Business School
Overview
Strategy issues Three perspectives: strategic, political, cultural Organizational structures Motivation and relationships Group processes Management and leadership roles
key activities
value proposition
customer relationships
key partners
customer segments
revenue streams
images by JAM
http://alexosterwalder.com/ http://www.businessmodelgeneration.com/
Inputs
Informal Organization
Output
Strategy Task
Individual
Feedback
5 Forces Framework
For analyzing strategy Devised by prof. Michael Porter The 5 forces are:
Perspectives on organizations
Mediate between the manager (detective) and organizations
They determine what data you see (hear, feel) in the organization and how we interpret the data What questions you ask and where your attention lies What meanings you attach Over time you may begin to identify with a perspective No single perspective is adequate It is easy to get locked into a single perspective, but difficult then to deal with complexity
Three Perspectives
Strategic Design
Organizations are machines
An organization is a mechanical system crafted to achieve a defined goal. Parts must fit well together and match the demands of the environment.
Political
Organizations are contests
An organization is a social system encompassing diverse, and sometimes contradictory, interests and goals. Competition for resources is expected.
Cultural
Organizations are cultures
An organization is a symbolic system of meanings, artifacts, values, and routines. Informal norms and traditions exert a strong influence on behavior.
Strategic perspective
Organization Structures
Functional Division of Labor Coordination By Inputs Hierarchical supervision. Plans and procedures Divisional By Outputs Division General Manager & Corporate Staff Separation of Strategy & execution Matrix By Inputs and Outputs Dual reporting relationships
Decision Rights
Highly centralized
Shared
Considerable
Modest
Low
Politics
Inter-functional
Basis of Authority
Divisional
Weak
Hybrid/Matrix
Moderate
Strong
Weak/Moderate
Moderate
Weak/Moderate
Strong
Strong
Weak
Strong
Moderate
Strong
Very Strong
Moderate
Stable
Heterogeneous
Caution: Matrix structures look appealing because they avoid the glaring weaknesses of the other forms (shaded areas), but they are difficult to implement, requiring a lot of natural collaboration.
Formal structures clarify roles, relationships, and authority within the organization
Organize along the dimensions that are competitively most important But understand any solution has drawbacks
Motivation
Needs Hierarchy Theory (Maslow) Goal-setting Theory (Locke & Latham) Equity Theory
Five levels of needs; the order in which they demand to be satisfied is from: - Physiological needs to - Safety needs to - Social needs to - Esteem needs to - Self-actualization needs
Implications of Needs
Promote a healthy workforce Provide financial security Provide opportunities to socialize Recognize employees accomplishments
Goal-setting Theory
(Locke and Latham)
Intentions to work toward a goal are a major source of work motivation What type of goals?
Goal commitment (the internalized desire to reach the goal) Self-efficacy beliefs (you think you can do it)
Implications of goals
Assign specific goals (people perform at higher levels when asked to meet specific high-performance goals than when asked to do your best) Assign difficult but acceptable performance goals Provide feedback concerning goal attainment
Fairness Approaches
When people compare themselves to relevant others, they can experience fairness or lack of fairness Two types of concerns:
Distributive justice (the perceived fairness of the amount and allocation of rewards) Procedural justice (the perceived fairness of the process used to determine the distribution of rewards)
Examples
Wanting teamwork, but rewarding individuals Employee involvement and empowerment but controlling resources
Why?
Over-emphasis on objective simple, quantifiable measures Over-emphasis on highly visible behaviors Other values more important than efficiency
Future
Need more holistic measures of performance factors Learn what people value, dont assume
Skill variety the degree to which the job requires a variety of different activities Task identity the degree to which the job requires completion of a whole and identifiable piece of work Significance - the degree to which the job has a substantial impact on the lives or work of other people Autonomy the degree to which the job provides substantial freedom and discretion to the individual in scheduling the work and in determining the procedures to be used in carrying it out Feedback - the degree to which carrying out the job provides the person with clear and direct information about the effectiveness of her/his performance
A self-directed work team is a formally recognized group of employees who are responsible for the entire work progress of segment that delivers a product or service. Each team member learns a broad range of skills and switches job assignments frequently.
TEAMS
Clear leadership Respect for all roles Conflict and collaboration and cohesion but not necessarily compromise are good Recognize and work through differences with one goal in mind The informality of formal groups: other needs being met (friendship, having fun)
Real Teams outperform other like groups, and when led exceptionally well, outperform all performance expectations
Team
Reflects variety of perspectives Can combine skills, abilities, information and ideas Generates more alternatives Increases understanding Eases implementation Greater acceptance and support of the decision Solutions are better than individuals on average
Problem is clear and wellstructured Group acceptance is not necessary for implementation Less time Fewer resources Greater individual accountability
Less groupthink
Expert opinion is often better than teams
A Managers Job
(Mintzberg, 1996)
The Manager
Conceiving (a framework, a perspective for the job) Scheduling (how is the work going to be carried out)
Managing by information
Managing action
Leadership Defined
The process by which one individual influences other group members toward the attainment of defined group or organizational goals (Greenberg).
Managers
and
Leaders
Establish plans Manage execution Drive for results Show commitment Manage profitability Commit to quality Coach and develop others Recognize good performance
Provide direction Set priorities Create and communicate a vision Empower and motivate others Think strategically Leverage networks Lead courageously Champion change
Becoming a Leader
Know yourself: theories, values, style Authenticity be true to yourself Dont underestimate the ability to develop and improve your leadership skills through practice and experience Similarly, develop your latent charisma:
Make use of your emotional intelligence But, be mindful of risks of leadership abuse
"Never underestimate the power of a small group of committed people to change the world. In fact, it is the only thing that ever has."
(Margaret Mead)
Multumesc!
metiu@essec.edu