Professional Documents
Culture Documents
portfolio choice of
individual investor
Presented by:
Varun jindal (211161)
Durgendra singh (211172)
TNVM ravindra mohan (211146)
Introduction
The traditional bulwark of the equity
market place-the individual investor
has been an object of scrutiny only in
a very aggressive terms. The
individual investor has been a
significant
contributor
to
the
allocation and liquidity function of
capital market. Accordingly, it is imp
to understand his concerns. In this
direction we tried to find what are the
factors that influence his choice of
portfolio.
Methodology
Data was obtained by a questionnaire survey of a
representation cross section
of 200 individuals.
Representative cross section for sampling proposes was
taken only those household which are capable of
financial investment.
Variables employed:
Age
Income
Risk tolerance
Expected return
35
46
52
59
8
200
%
17.5
23
26
29.5
4
100
52
46
38
26
38
200
%
26
23
19
13
19
100
Risk tolerance
No. of respondents
more willingness
less willingness
risk factor hs no influence
can't say
10
69
72
49
200
5
34.5
36
24.5
100
52
45
57
46
200
%
26
22.5
28.5
23
100
25-35
10
14
9
4
6
43
35-45
16
15
11
12
11
65
45-55
16
12
11
6
18
63
>55
10
5
7
4
3
29
total
52
46
38
26
38
200
0-15%
20
15
7
2
8
52
15%-30% 30%-50%
15
10
13
14
12
15
3
10
2
8
45
57
>50%
7
4
4
11
20
46
52
46
38
26
38
200
Determinant of portfolio
choice
To identify the factors
influencing the
portfolio of individual
in investors a
multiple regression
was developed. The
expected return was
taken as a
dependent variable
and rest all the
variables was taken
as independent
variables.
X2
Income in '000(10,000)
25
25
25
45
45
45
30
30
30
50
50
50
35
35
35
55
55
55
X3
risk
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Y1
Expected return(%)
10
15
20
15
25
35
11
15
20
12
17
20
10
13
17
9
13
16
Regression analysis
Regression
Statistics
Multiple R
0.944086032
R Square
0.891298436
2.885849095
Observations
12
ANOVA
df
SS
MS
Significance F
Regression
Residual
Total
66.625
11 612.9166667
8.328125
Standard Error
t Stat
Intercept
2.013888889
5.137282735
0.392014416 0.705283891
X Variable 1
-0.322222222
0.111076383
-2.900906675 0.019864069
X Variable 2
0.408333333
0.083307288
4.901531968 0.001191462
X Variable 3
5.875
1.020301732
5.758100583 0.000425033
Lower 95%
Upper 95%
Intercept
-9.832706332
13.86048411
-9.832706332 13.86048411
X Variable 1
-0.578364822
-0.066079623
-0.578364822 -0.06607962
X Variable 2
0.216226384
0.600440283
0.216226384 0.600440283
X Variable 3
3.522179988
8.227820012
3.522179988 8.227820012
Lower 95.0%
P-value
Upper 95.0%
Regression residual
Observation
Predicted Y
Residuals
10.04166667
-0.041666667
15.91666667
-0.916666667
21.79166667
-1.791666667
18.20833333
-3.208333333
24.08333333
0.916666667
29.95833333
5.041666667
5.208333333
3.791666667
11.08333333
0.916666667
16.95833333
-1.958333333
10
13.375
-1.375
11
19.25
0.75
12
25.125
-2.125
Results
Dependent variable = Expected return
Multiple R = 0.944086032
Adjusted R2 = 0.85053535
Standard error = 2.885849095
F = 21.8653325 significant at 0.000328298
T STAT:
X1 = -2.900906675
X2 = 4.901531968
X3 = 5.758100583
References
L.fisher and J.Lorie Rates of returns on investments in common
sock. Journal of business,41, July 1968, Pp 291-316.
V.Rangarajan, Chennai investor is conservative, business line,
FEB23, 1997 p20.
V.Rangarajan, investment size based segmentation of individual
investor, management researcher, 3-3&4, jan-june, pp21-28.
Peter S.Yoo, age dependent portfolio selection, St. Louis : Federal
reserve bank of St. Louis, 1994.
L.C. Gupta, Indian share owner A survey , NEW Delhi, society for
capital market research and development, 1991.