You are on page 1of 118

Chapter 5

Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior

Topics to be Discussed
Describing Risk

Preferences Toward Risk


Reducing Risk

The Demand for Risky Assets

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

Introduction
Choice with certainty is reasonably straightforward How do we make choices when certain variables such as income and prices are uncertain (making choices with risk)?

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

Describing Risk
To measure risk we must know:

1. All of the possible outcomes


2. The probability or likelihood that each outcome will occur

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

Describing Risk
Interpreting Probability
1. Objective Interpretation

Based on the observed frequency of past events Based on perception that an outcome will occur

2. Subjective Interpretation

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

Interpreting Probability
Subjective Probability
Different information or different abilities to process the same information can influence the subjective probability Based on judgment or experience

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

Describing Risk
With an interpretation of probability, must determine 2 measures to help describe and compare risky choices
1. Expected value 2. Variability

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

Describing Risk
Expected Value
The weighted average of the payoffs or values resulting from all possible outcomes
Expected

value measures the central tendency; the payoff or value expected on average

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

Expected Value An Example


Investment in offshore drilling exploration: Two outcomes are possible
Success the stock price increases from $30 to $40/share Failure the stock price falls from $30 to $20/share

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

Expected Value An Example


Objective Probability
100 explorations, 25 successes and 75 failures Probability (Pr) of success = 1/4 and the probability of failure = 3/4

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

10

Expected Value An Example


EV Pr(success )(value of success) Pr(failure )(value of failure)
EV 1 4 ($40/share ) 3 4 ($20/share )

EV $25/share
2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 11

Expected Value
In general, for n possible outcomes:
Possible outcomes having payoffs X1, X2, , Xn Probabilities of each outcome is given by Pr1, Pr2, , Prn

E(X) Pr1 X 1 Pr 2 X 2 ... Pr n X n

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

12

Describing Risk
Variability
The extent to which possible outcomes of an uncertain event may differ How much variation exists in the possible choice

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

13

Variability An Example
Suppose you are choosing between two part-time sales jobs that have the same expected income ($1,500) The first job is based entirely on commission The second is a salaried position

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

14

Variability An Example
There are two equally likely outcomes in the first job: $2,000 for a good sales job and $1,000 for a modestly successful one The second pays $1,510 most of the time (.99 probability), but you will earn $510 if the company goes out of business (.01 probability)

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

15

Variability An Example
Outcome 1 Prob. Job 1: Commission Job 2: Fixed Salary .5 .99 Income 2000 1510 Outcome 2 Prob. .5 .01 Income 1000 510

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

16

Variability An Example
Income from Possible Sales Job Job 1 Expected Income

E(X 1 ) .5($2000) .5($1000) $1500


Job 2 Expected Income

E(X 2 ) .99($1510) .01($510) $1500


2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 17

Variability
While the expected values are the same, the variability is not Greater variability from expected values signals greater risk Variability comes from deviations in payoffs
Difference between expected payoff and actual payoff

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

18

Variability An Example
Deviations from Expected Income ($)
Outcome Deviation Outcome Deviation 1 2

Job 1 Job 2

$2000 1510

$500 10

$1000 510

-$500 -900

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

19

Variability
Average deviations are always zero so we must adjust for negative numbers We can measure variability with standard deviation
The square root of the average of the squares of the deviations of the payoffs associated with each outcome from their expected value

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

20

Variability
Standard deviation is a measure of risk
Measures how variable your payoff will be More variability means more risk Individuals generally prefer less variability less risk

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

21

Variability
The standard deviation is written:

Pr1X1 E ( X ) Pr2 X 2 E ( X )
2

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

22

Standard Deviation Example 1


Deviations from Expected Income ($)
Outcome Deviation Outcome Deviation 1 2

Job 1 Job 2

$2000 1510

$500 10

$1000 510

-$500 -900

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

23

Standard Deviation Example 1


Standard deviations of the two jobs are:

Pr1X1 E ( X )2 Pr2 X 2 E ( X )2
1 0.5($250 ,000 ) 0.5($250 ,000 ) 1 250 ,000 500
2 0.99 ($ 100 ) 0.01($980 ,100 ) 2 9,900 99 .50
2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 24

Standard Deviation Example 1


Job 1 has a larger standard deviation and therefore it is the riskier alternative The standard deviation also can be used when there are many outcomes instead of only two

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

25

Standard Deviation Example 2


Job 1 is a job in which the income ranges from $1000 to $2000 in increments of $100 that are all equally likely Job 2 is a job in which the income ranges from $1300 to $1700 in increments of $100 that, also, are all equally likely

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

26

Outcome Probabilities - Two Jobs


Probability
Job 1 has greater spread: greater standard deviation and greater risk than Job 2.

0.2

Job 2

0.1

Job 1

$1000
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

$1500
Chapter 5

$2000

Income
27

Decision Making Example 1


What if the outcome probabilities of two jobs have unequal probability of outcomes?
Job 1: greater spread and standard deviation Peaked distribution: extreme payoffs are less likely that those in the middle of the distribution You will choose job 2 again

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

28

Unequal Probability Outcomes


Probability
The distribution of payoffs associated with Job 1 has a greater spread and standard deviation than those with Job 2.

0.2

Job 2
0.1

Job 1

$1000
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

$1500
Chapter 5

$2000

Income
29

Decision Making Example 2


Suppose we add $100 to each payoff in Job 1 which makes the expected payoff = $1600
Job 1: expected income $1,600 and a standard deviation of $500 Job 2: expected income of $1,500 and a standard deviation of $99.50

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

30

Decision Making Example 2


Which job should be chosen?
Depends on the individual Some may be willing to take risk with higher expected income Some will prefer less risk even with lower expected income

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

31

Risk and Crime Deterrence


Attitudes toward risk affect willingness to break the law Suppose a city wants to deter people from double parking Monetary fines may be better than jail time

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

32

Risk and Crime Deterrence


Costs of apprehending criminals are not zero, therefore
Fines must be higher than the costs to society Probability of apprehension is actually less than one

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

33

Risk and Crime Deterrence Example


Assumptions:
1. Double-parking saves a person $5 in terms of time spent searching for a parking space 2. The driver is risk neutral 3. Cost of apprehension is zero

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

34

Risk and Crime Deterrence Example


A fine greater than $5.00 would deter the driver from double parking
Benefit of double parking ($5) is less than the cost ($6.00) equals a net benefit that is negative If the value of double parking is greater than $5.00, then the person would still break the law

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

35

Risk and Crime Deterrence Example


The same deterrence effect is obtained by either
A $50 fine with a 0.1 probability of being caught resulting in an expected penalty of $5 or A $500 fine with a 0.01 probability of being caught resulting in an expected penalty of $5

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

36

Risk and Crime Deterrence Example


Enforcement costs are reduced with high fine and low probability Most effective if drivers dont like to take risks

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

37

Preferences Toward Risk


Can expand evaluation of risky alternative by considering utility that is obtained by risk
A consumer gets utility from income Payoff measured in terms of utility

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

38

Preferences Toward Risk Example


A person is earning $15,000 and receiving 13.5 units of utility from the job She is considering a new, but risky job
0.50 chance of $30,000 0.50 chance of $10,000

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

39

Preferences Toward Risk Example


Utility at $30,000 is 18 Utility at $10,000 is 10 Must compare utility from the risky job with current utility of 13.5 To evaluate the new job, we must calculate the expected utility of the risky job

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

40

Preferences Toward Risk


The expected utility of the risky option is the sum of the utilities associated with all her possible incomes weighted by the probability that each income will occur E(u) = (Prob. of Utility 1) *(Utility 1) + (Prob. of Utility 2)*(Utility 2)

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

41

Preferences Toward Risk Example


The expected is:
E(u) = (1/2)u($10,000) + (1/2)u($30,000) = 0.5(10) + 0.5(18) = 14 E(u) of new job is 14, which is greater than the current utility of 13.5 and therefore preferred

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

42

Preferences Toward Risk


People differ in their preference toward risk People can be risk averse, risk neutral, or risk loving

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

43

Preferences Toward Risk


Risk Averse
A person who prefers a certain given income to a risky income with the same expected value The person has a diminishing marginal utility of income Most common attitude towards risk
Ex:

Market for insurance

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

44

Risk Averse - Example


A person can have a $20,000 job with 100% probability and receive a utility level of 16 The person could have a job with a 0.5 chance of earning $30,000 and a 0.5 chance of earning $10,000

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

45

Risk Averse Example


Expected Income of Risky Job
E(I) = (0.5)($30,000) + (0.5)($10,000) E(I) = $20,000

Expected Utility of Risky Job


E(u) = (0.5)(10) + (0.5)(18) E(u) = 14

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

46

Risk Averse Example


Expected income from both jobs is the same risk averse may choose current job Expected utility is greater for certain job
Would keep certain job

Risk averse persons losses (decreased utility) are more important than risky gains
2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 47

Risk Averse
Can see risk averse choices graphically Risky job has expected income = $20,000 with expected utility = 14
Point F

Certain job has expected income = $20,000 with utility = 16


Point D

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

48

Risk Averse Utility Function


Utility

E
D C F
The consumer is risk averse because she would prefer a certain income of $20,000 to an uncertain expected income = $20,000

18
16 14

A 10

0
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

10

16 20
Chapter 5

30

Income ($1,000)
49

Preferences Toward Risk


A person is said to be risk neutral if they show no preference between a certain income, and an uncertain income with the same expected value Constant marginal utility of income

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

50

Risk Neutral
Expected value for risky option is the same as utility for certain outcome
E(I) = (0.5)($10,000) + (0.5)($30,000) = $20,000 E(u) = (0.5)(6) + (0.5)(18) = 12

This is the same as the certain income of $20,000 with utility of 12


2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 51

Risk Neutral
Utility 18
E

12

The consumer is risk neutral and is indifferent between certain events and uncertain events with the same expected income.

0
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

10

20
Chapter 5

30

Income ($1,000)
52

Preferences Toward Risk


A person is said to be risk loving if they show a preference toward an uncertain income over a certain income with the same expected value
Examples: Gambling, some criminal activities

Increasing marginal utility of income

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

53

Risk Loving
Expected value for risky option point F
E(I) = (0.5)($10,000) + (0.5)($30,000) = $20,000 E(u) = (0.5)(3) + (0.5)(18) = 10.5

Certain income is $20,000 with utility of 8 point C Risky alternative is preferred

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

54

Risk Loving
Utility 18 E
The consumer is risk loving because she would prefer the gamble to a certain income.

10.5
8 A 3 0
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

F C

10

20
Chapter 5

30

Income ($1,000)
55

Preferences Toward Risk


The risk premium is the maximum amount of money that a risk-averse person would pay to avoid taking a risk The risk premium depends on the risky alternatives the person faces

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

56

Risk Premium Example


From the previous example
A person has a .5 probability of earning $30,000 and a .5 probability of earning $10,000 The expected income is $20,000 with expected utility of 14

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

57

Risk Premium Example


Point F shows the risky scenario the utility of 14 can also be obtained with certain income of $16,000 This person would be willing to pay up to $4000 (20 16) to avoid the risk of uncertain income Can show this graphically by drawing a straight line between the two points line CF
2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 58

Risk Premium Example


Utility Risk Premium
Here, the risk premium is $4,000 because a certain income of $16,000 gives the person the same expected utility as the uncertain income with expected value of $20,000.

G
20 18
14

E
C

A
10

0
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

10

16

20
Chapter 5

30

40

Income ($1,000)
59

Risk Aversion and Income


Variability in potential payoffs increases the risk premium Example:
A job has a .5 probability of paying $40,000 (utility of 20) and a .5 chance of paying 0 (utility of 0).

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

60

Risk Aversion and Income


Example (cont.):
The expected income is still $20,000, but the expected utility falls to 10
E(u)

= (0.5)u($0) + (0.5)u($40,000) = 0 + .5(20) = 10

The certain income of $20,000 has utility of 16 If person must take new job, their utility will fall by 6

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

61

Risk Aversion and Income


Example (cont.):
They can get 10 units of utility by taking a certain job paying $10,000 The risk premium, therefore, is $10,000 (i.e. they would be willing to give up $10,000 of the $20,000 and have the same E(u) as the risky job

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

62

Risk Aversion and Income


The greater the variability, the more the person would be willing to pay to avoid the risk, and the larger the risk premium

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

63

Risk Aversion and Indifference Curves


Can describe a persons risk aversion using indifference curves that relate expected income to variability of income (standard deviation) Since risk is undesirable, greater risk requires greater expected income to make the person equally well off Indifference curves are therefore upward sloping
2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 64

Risk Aversion and Indifference Curves


Expected Income

U3 U2 U1

Highly Risk Averse: An increase in standard deviation requires a large increase in income to maintain satisfaction.

Standard Deviation of Income


2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 65

Risk Aversion and Indifference Curves


Expected Income Slightly Risk Averse: A large increase in standard deviation requires only a small increase in income to maintain satisfaction.

U3
U2 U1

Standard Deviation of Income


2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 66

Reducing Risk
Consumers are generally risk averse and therefore want to reduce risk Three ways consumers attempt to reduce risk are:
1. Diversification 2. Insurance 3. Obtaining more information

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

67

Reducing Risk
Diversification
Reducing risk by allocating resources to a variety of activities whose outcomes are not closely related

Example:
Suppose a firm has a choice of selling air conditioners, heaters, or both The probability of it being hot or cold is 0.5 How does a firm decide what to sell?
2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 68

Income from Sales of Appliances


Hot Weather Air conditioner sales Heater sales

Cold Weather
$12,000

$30,000

12,000

30,000

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

69

Diversification Example
If the firm sells only heaters or air conditioners their income will be either $12,000 or $30,000 Their expected income would be:
1/2($12,000) + 1/2($30,000) = $21,000

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

70

Diversification Example
If the firm divides their time evenly between appliances, their air conditioning and heating sales would be half their original values If it were hot, their expected income would be $15,000 from air conditioners and $6,000 from heaters, or $21,000 If it were cold, their expected income would be $6,000 from air conditioners and $15,000 from heaters, or $21,000

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

71

Diversification Example
With diversification, expected income is $21,000 with no risk Better off diversifying to minimize risk Firms can reduce risk by diversifying among a variety of activities that are not closely related

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

72

Reducing Risk The Stock Market


If invest all money in one stock, then take on a lot of risk
If that stock loses value, you lose all your investment value

Can spread risk out by investing in many different stocks or investments


Ex: Mutual funds

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

73

Reducing Risk Insurance


Risk averse are willing to pay to avoid risk If the cost of insurance equals the expected loss, risk averse people will buy enough insurance to recover fully from a potential financial loss

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

74

The Decision to Insure

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

75

Reducing Risk Insurance


For the risk averse consumer, guarantee of same income regardless of outcome has higher utility than facing the probability of risk Expected utility with insurance is higher than without

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

76

The Law of Large Numbers


Insurance companies know that although single events are random and largely unpredictable, the average outcome of many similar events can be predicted When insurance companies sell many policies, they face relatively little risk

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

77

Reducing Risk Actuarially Fair


Insurance companies can be sure total premiums paid will equal total money paid out Companies set the premiums so money received will be enough to pay expected losses

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

78

Reducing Risk Actuarially Fair


Some events with very little probability of occurrence such as floods and earthquakes are no longer insured privately
Cannot calculate true expected values and expected losses Governments have had to create insurance for these types of events
Ex:

National Flood Insurance Program

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

79

The Value of Information


Risk often exists because we dont know all the information surrounding a decision Because of this, information is valuable and people are willing to pay for it

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

80

The Value of Information


The value of complete information
The difference between the expected value of a choice with complete information and the expected value when information is incomplete

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

81

The Value of Information Example


Per capita milk consumption has fallen over the years The milk producers engaged in market research to develop new sales strategies to encourage the consumption of milk

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

82

The Value of Information Example


Findings
Milk demand is seasonal with the greatest demand in the spring Price elasticity of demand is negative and small Income elasticity is positive and large

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

83

The Value of Information Example


Milk advertising increases sales most in the spring Allocating advertising based on this information in New York increased profits by 9% or $14 million The cost of the information was relatively low, while the value was substantial (increased profits)
2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 84

Demand for Risky Assets


Most individuals are risk averse and yet choose to invest money in assets that carry some risk
Why do they do this? How do they decide how much risk to bear?

Must examine the demand for risky assets

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

85

The Demand for Risky Assets


Assets
Something that provides a flow of money or services to its owner
Ex:

homes, savings accounts, rental property, shares of stock

The flow of money or services can be explicit (dividends) or implicit (capital gain)

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

86

The Demand for Risky Assets


Capital Gain
An increase in the value of an asset

Capital loss
A decrease in the value of an asset

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

87

Risky and Riskless Assets


Risky Asset
Provides an uncertain flow of money or services to its owner Examples
Apartment

rent, capital gains, corporate bonds, stock prices Dont know with certainty what will happen to the value of a stock

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

88

Risky and Riskless Assets


Riskless Asset
Provides a flow of money or services that is known with certainty Examples
Short-term

government bonds, short-term certificates of deposit

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

89

The Demand for Risky Assets


People hold assets because of the monetary flows provided To compare assets, one must consider the monetary flow relative to the assets price (value) Return on an asset
The total monetary flow of an asset, including capital gains or losses, as a fraction of its price

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

90

The Demand for Risky Assets


Individuals hope to have an asset that has returns larger than the rate of inflation
Want to have greater purchasing power

Real Return of an Asset (inflation adjusted)


The simple (or nominal) return less the rate of inflation

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

91

The Demand for Risky Assets


Since returns are not known with certainty, investors often make decisions based on expected returns Expected Return
Return that an asset should earn on average In the end, the actual return could be higher or lower than the expected return

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

92

Investments Risk and Return (1926-1999)

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

93

The Demand for Risky Assets


The higher the return, the greater the risk Investors will choose lower return investments in order to reduce risk A risk-averse investor must balance risk relative to return
Must study the trade-off between return and risk

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

94

Trade-offs: Risk and Returns Example


An investor is choosing between T-Bills and stocks:
1. T-bills riskless 2. Stocks risky

Investor can choose only T-bills, only stocks, or some combination of both

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

95

Trade-offs: Risk and Returns Example


Rf = risk-free return on T-bill
Expected return equals actual return on a riskless asset

Rm = the expected return on stocks rm = the actual returns on stock Assume Rm > Rf or no risk averse investor would buy the stocks

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

96

Trade-offs: Risk and Returns Example


How do we determine the allocation of funds between the two choices?
b = fraction of funds placed in stocks (1-b) = fraction of funds placed in T-bills

Expected return on portfolio is weighted average of expected return on the two assets

RP bRm (1 b) R f
2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 97

Trade-offs: Risk and Returns Example


Assume, Rm = 12%, Rf = 4%, and b = 1/2

RP bRm (1 b) R f RP (1 / 2)(12%) (1 1 / 2)(4%) RP 8%


2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 98

Trade-offs: Risk and Returns Example


How risky is the portfolio?
As stated before, one measure of risk is standard deviation Standard deviation of the risky asset, m Standard deviation of risky portfolio, p Can show that:

p b m
2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 99

Trade-offs: Risk and Returns Example


We still need to figure out the allocation between the investment choices A type of budget line can be constructed describing the trade-off between risk and expected return

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

100

Trade-offs: Risk and Returns Example

R p bRm (1 b) R f Rp R f ( Rm R f )

Expected return on the portfolio, rp increases as the standard deviation, p of that return increases
2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 101

Trade-offs: Risk and Returns Example


The slope of the line is called the price of risk
Tells how much extra risk an investor must incur to enjoy a higher expected return

Slope (Rm Rf )/ m

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

102

Choosing Between Risk and Return


If all funds are invested in T-bills (b=0), expected return is Rf If all funds are invested in stocks (b=1), expected return is Rm but with standard deviation of m Funds may be invested between the assets with expected return between Rf and Rm, with standard deviation between m and 0
2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 103

Choosing Between Risk and Return


We can draw indifference curves showing combinations of risk and return that leave an investor equally satisfied Comparing the payoffs and risk between the two investment choices and the preferences of the investor, the optimal portfolio choice can be determined Investor wants to maximize utility within the affordable options
2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 104

Choosing Between Risk and Return


Expected Return,Rp
U2 is the optimal choice since it gives the highest return for a given risk and is still affordable

U3 U2 U1 Rm R* Rf

Budget Line

2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5

Standard Deviation of Return, p


105

Choosing Between Risk and Return


Different investors have different attitudes toward risk If we consider a very risk averse investor (A)
Portfolio will contain mostly T-bills and less in stock, with return slightly larger than Rf

If we consider a riskier investor (B)


Portfolio will contain mostly stock and less T-bills, with a higher return Rb but with higher standard deviation

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

106

The Choices of Two Different Investors


Expected Return,Rp

UB

UA

Budget line
Given the same budget line, investor A chooses low return/low risk, while investor B chooses high return/high risk.

Rm
RB

RA R
f

A
2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

B
Chapter 5

Standard Deviation of Return, p


107

Investing in the Stock Market


In 1990s many people began investing in the stock market for the first time
Percent of US families who had directly or indirectly invested in the stock market
1989

= 32% 1998 = 49%

Percent with share of wealth in stock market


1989

= 26% 1998 = 54%

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

108

Investing in the Stock Market


Why were stock market investments increasing during the 90s?
Ease of online trading Significant increase in stock prices during late 90s Employers shifting to self-directed retirement plans Publicity for do it yourself investing

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

109

Behavioral Economics
Sometimes individuals behavior contradicts basic assumptions of consumer choice
More information about human behavior might lead to better understanding This is the objective of behavioral economics
Improving

understanding of consumer choice by incorporating more realistic and detailed assumptions regarding human behavior

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

110

Behavioral Economics
There are a number of examples of consumer choice contradictions
You take at trip and stop at a restaurant that you will most likely never stop at again. You still think it fair to leave a 15% tip rewarding the good service. You choose to buy a lottery ticket even though the expected value is less than the price of the ticket

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

111

Behavioral Economics
Reference Points
Economists assume that consumers place a unique value on the goods/services purchased Psychologists have found that perceived value can depend on circumstances
You

are able to buy a ticket to the sold out Cher concert for the published price of $125. You find out you can sell the ticket for $500 but you choose not to, even though you would never have paid more than $250 for the ticket.

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

112

Behavioral Economics
Reference Points (cont.)
The point from which an individual makes a consumption decision From the example, owning the Cher ticket is the reference point
Individuals

dislike losing things they own They value items more when they own them than when they do not Losses are valued more than gains Utility loss from selling the ticket is greater than original utility gain from purchasing it
2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 113

Behavioral Economics
Experimental Economics
Students were divided into two groups Group one was given a mug with a market value of $5.00 Group two received nothing Students with mugs were asked how much they would take to sell the mug back
Lowest

price for mugs, on average, was $7.00

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

114

Behavioral Economics
Experimental Economics (cont.)
Group without mugs was asked minimum amount of cash they would except in lieu of the mug
On

average willing to accept $3.50 instead of getting the mug

Group one had reference point of owning the mug Group two had reference point of no mug

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

115

Behavioral Economics
Fairness
Individuals often make choices because they think they are fair and appropriate
Charitable

giving, tipping in restaurants

Some consumers will go out of their way to punish a store they think is unfair in their pricing Manager might offer higher than market wages to make for happier working environment or more productive worker

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

116

Behavioral Economics
The Laws of Probability
Individuals dont always evaluate uncertain events according to the laws of probability Individuals also dont always maximize expected utility Law of small numbers
Overstate

probability of an event when faced with little information Ex: overstate likelihood they will win the lottery

2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

117

Behavioral Economics
Theory up to now has explained much but not all of consumer choice Although not all of consumer decisions can be explained by the theory up to this point, it helps us understand much of it Behavioral economics is a developing field to help explain and elaborate on situations not well explained by the basic consumer model
2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 118

You might also like