The Long Road to a US

Missile Defense
Mike Booen
Vice President
Advanced Missile Defense/
Directed Energy Weapons

May 2009

Copyright © 2007 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved.

Customer Success Is Our Mission is a trademark of Raytheon Company.
Missile Defense is a System
Proposition (and deployed hardware!)
Sensor Interceptor/Kill Vehicle Command & Control

XBR EKV C3I

• Early Warning • Hit to Kill Vehicles • Real time system

• Acquisition • High Speed/Accuracy communication
• Tracking • Raytheon products • Multi-system
• Raytheon products ­ Patriot interoperability
­ STSS ­ GMD (EKV)
• Raytheon products
­ Patriot
­ Patriot ­ Aegis (SM-3)
­ THAAD BMC3
­ SBX ­ KEI
­ GMD (GFC)
­ UEWR
­ JNIC (MDWAR)
­ BMDS Radar
­ THAAD GBR
All Missiles, All Phases of Flight

Midcourse
SM-3, GBI

Ascent
NCADE, KEI

Terminal
Boost Arrow, PAC-3, THAAD,
DSWS (Stunner)
KEI,ABL, NCADE

Attack Ops
F-15, F-16, Mr Paveway

Boost/Ascent Midcourse/ Terminal

Upper Tier

Harder from Right to Left…..More Expensive………

Attack Ops: Where You’ld like to be……
The Essence of Missile Defense

When the warhead is in the air.......

your only alternative is missile defense
 All missiles, all phases of flight…
Boost/Ascent Midcourse Terminal

High Endo-Atmosphere Exo-Atmosphere

GMD SM-3

THAAD
Engagement Altitude

As Terminal Phase
evolved from an Air
Defense history, the
investment went to
mid course

Endo-Atmosphere
Cloud Break

NCADE Stunner PAC-3 SM-2 Blk IV

This continuum drives US

investment…Israel too!
 SM-3 Kinetic Warhead Configuration Evolution
SM- LEAP
Historical Evolution:
• Ground Launch Interceptor
Demo w/ Generic Target /
LEAP 2 FTV-3 FLT
• Ship Launch Interceptor
Flight Test - SM 2 Integration
/ FTV-3
SOLID HOVER

MARCH 1995
LEAP­2  WSMR

LIQUID HOVER MARCH 1994

JUNE 1992

JUNE 1991
 Israel Had a Similar Experience With Arrow!
US/IS MOA Arrow Start System US/Israel ADP MOA IAF
Experiment Development Deploymen
t

1987 88‘ 89‘ 90‘ 91‘ 92‘ 93‘ 94‘ 95‘ 96‘ 97‘ 98‘ 99‘ 2000

System
Studies
Arrow
Arrow Missile 1

Arrow
2
Tests

#1 #2
Green Pine
FCR
#1 #2
Citron Tree
FCS
System
Integration
Production

Legend: Failure Qualified Success No

Succes Test
s
 Raytheon Interceptor
Development History
1985-89 1990-1994 1995-1999 2000-2004 2005-2009

FM-2 (25 JAN 02)

HEDI KITE 1 (1990) SIT (2001)
DELTA 180 (1986) FTV-3 SM-3 Blk IA (2005)FM-7 (24 FEB 05)
(1995)

FTR-1A (2001) FM-3 (13 JUN 02)

ASAT/ RV Hit (2005)

DTB FTM-8
(1991) (17 NOV 05)
EKV C0 (2002)
LEAP II
LEAP Contract (1987) FTV-4 (1995) FM-4 (21 NOV 02)
(1992)

CE II (2005)

FTM-10 (22 JUN 06)

LEAP III (1993) FM-6 (11 DEC 03)

LEAP
Liquid SM-3 ALI
Hover (1999) EKV TB/CE (2004)
(1988) SM-3 Blk IB/II (2007)
EKV Intercepts at KMR
(2000-2001)
LEAP SDACS
(1992, 1994)
Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV)
• Kill Vehicle for the Ground Based
Interceptor (GBI) component of Ground-
based Midcourse Defense (GMD)

• Advanced multi-color electro-optical

seeker – provides discrimination and hit-
to-kill technology for complete
destruction of the threat warhead

• Over 8 successful hit-to-kill intercepts

(latest successful intercept test 8 Dec
2008)

• Over 35 EKV’s delivered to date

• Operational interceptors emplaced at Ft.
Greely, Alaska and Vandenberg AFB,
California

• Development over 2 decades, $ >2B

Standard Missile 3 (SM-3)
• Sea-based Ballistic Missile Defense
interceptor providing upper tier, regional,
exo-atmospheric defense

• Leverages Standard Missile family

• Kinetic Warhead utilizes Solid Divert and
Attitude Control System (SDACS)

• 15 successful hit-to-kill intercepts

• Over 60 SM-3’s delivered
• Raytheon is working to develop a
platform capability for SM-3 operations
that is compatible with other international
systems

• Development spans 25 years, well north

of a billion dollars
But what if Enemy Adapts?

Challenges for the Mid Course/Upper Tier:

You’re in Space, Known Countermeasures.....
The Long Road to Missile Defense
• Relative to Mid Course/Upper Tier
•Going to space (exo) complicates matters
•Countermeasures complicate matters
• It took a long time…..
• It took a lot of money…..
• Most systems evolved from decade old legacy systems
• Have to test in a fish bowl…..
• It isn’t really about the interceptor…..
• And the Enemy will adapt……
So you have the fancy MD capability

And the enemy goes cheap...

The Last Line of Defense

Public Release NAVSEA 0722

 Phalanx CIWS Evolution
Centurion LPWS
A Proven Family of CIWS Solutions Block 1B B/L 0&1 • Land-based
• Surface Mode Phalanx Weapon
• Block 0 - Anti Ship Missile Defense • IR / RF Fire System
• Block 1A - High G Maneuvering ASMD • Counter-Rockets,
Control
Artillery, and
• ELC &
• Block 1B - Increase Range & Add Optimized Gun
Mortars Capability
Littoral Surface & Air Barrels
• Enhanced
• Centurion - Land-based C-RAM capability ASCM
• SeaRAM - Replace Gun with RAM Capability

Block 0 Block 1 B/L 0 Block 1 B/L 1 Block 1 B/L 2 Block 1A

• ASMD • Smaller RCS • Shallow Dive • EMI • High Diving &
High G SeaRAM
• 3,000 SPM Detection Fire Control Improvement • 11 RAM
Maneuvering
• 0O - 5O El • 0O - 70O El • 4,500 SPM • Accuracy Targets Missiles
Search Search Improvement • CS Integration • 3x Gun
Ranges
• Helo &
Surface
Mode

79-87 87-88 88-89 90-95 95-97 97-98 99-09

Phalanx CIWS Has Been Continuously Improved

Public Release NAVSEA 0722

Land-based Phalanx in CRAM Role

• June ‘04 – US Army forces in Iraq (Operation Iraqi Freedom)

state requirement for a system to destroy rockets and mortar
rounds in flight
• July - Aug ‘04 – Army develops concept for a C-RAM system
and briefs to Department of the Army
• Sept ‘04 – Army approves concept and directs Proof-of- YPG Testing
2004
Principle test conducted at Yuma Proving Grounds
• Nov - Dec ’04 – C-RAM Proof of Principle test conducted at
Yuma Proving Grounds
• Jan ‘05 – Department of Defense directs conduct of more
Deployed
stressing tests System

• April ’05 – Army completes test of C-RAM Intercept (Centurion

2005

LPWS) and receives approval to field

• May ’05 - Present – Deployment and continuous test /
validation of C-RAM improvements

“Through ingenious use and integration . . . C-RAM Initial Capabilities went

from Concept to Initial Fielding in just 12 months”
US Army C-RAM Program Office
Public Release NAVSEA 0722
C-RAM (Counter-Rockets, Artillery, and
Mortars)
Land-based Phalanx Functions

COMMAND & CONTROL LPWS provides localized Command

7 / INTEGRATE & Control and integrates into larger
C-RAM networks

Only combat-proven intercept

solution
4 INTERCEPT
5 RESPOND
Contributes
to point-of-
Attacks reduced once origin
1 SHAPE their futility is determinati
recognized on
Typically detects
2 SENSE threat soon
after launch

6 PROTECT / DENY
3 WARN
Key warning
sensor in larger C-
RAM networks

Public Release NAVSEA 0722

Centurion LPWS
(Lethality and Fall of Shot)

M-940 High Explosive Incendiary

Traced Self-Destruct (HEIT-SD)
Ammunition
Increased Capability Against
Rocket And Mortar Threats
Built-in Detonation Delay Allows Penetration Of Target
Self-destruct Eliminates Fall Of Shot Hazards

Public Release NAVSEA 0722

 Land-based Phalanx
Theater Performance
• Over 110 kills and 1,500 localized warnings of incoming
attacks in Theater (US Count Only)
• Operational in 3 FOBs (Forward Operating Bases) In
• Successfully engaged a variety of targets in Test & Theater Combat
• Various sizes of mortars and rockets Since
2005

Lives Saved, Critical Assets / Infrastructure Protected

Public Release NAVSEA 0722
Laser Phalanx – No Longer
PowerPoint

Laser CIWS
The Long Road to Missile Defense
• No one realizes the need to deal with all missiles, all
phases of flight better than Israel
• It will take a long time…..
• It will take a lot of money…..
• Many legacy systems can offer near term help.....
• The enemy will change behavior
• And the Enemy will adapt……and we must also!
 Customer
Success
Is Our Mission