Action Plan for Rural Sanitation, 2011-2015

Draft prepared through UNICEF support to MoH A component of NTP3 Good basis to develop a national Action Plan, would benefit from some improvements

NTP3: Action Plan for Rural Sanitation 2011-2015: A Framework for Scaling Up
Some questions: Is the priority to get 17% with latrines to have hygienic latrines OR to get most of the 23% with no latrines to have latrines (including ensuring 15% are hygienic) OR a mix of these approaches? what is the baseline on access to information? what is the strategy for behaviour change once people have access to information? what strategy and monitoring framework will be used to look at related objectives, such as HWWS? assume there should be a link somewhere to peoples health (eg reduced incidence of diarrhoea or improving childrens growth)? Baseline (2010), (NTP3) 11,436,500 (77%) hh have latrines 8,905,988 (60%) hh have hygienic latrines 32,155 (80%) schools; 7,976 clinics (82%); 1,537 (47%) markets; 7,004 (70%) CPCs have latrines Targets, indicators (2015) 90% of rural hh have latrines (not stated in NTP3) 75% of rural hh use hygienic latrines (=NTP3) 75% of farming hh have hygienic livestock pens (NTP3 is 65%) 100% rural k-gartens, schools, clinics, markets and CPCs have access to hygienic latrines (=NTP3) 60% of communes collect and treat domestic waste (=NTP3) 80% of popn have access to information on RWSSH (=NTP3) 80% of rural poor have access to information on RWSSH (NTP3 is 90%) 90% of k-garten and schoolchildren participate in sanitation promotion (NTP3 is 100%) 80% of rural popn receive IEC on HWWS (=NTP3), 40% practice HWWS (not stated in NTP3) NTP3 also expects biogas at 30% of farming hh

NTP M&E System Proportion of hh having hygienic latrines (%) [indicator #6] Proportion of schools, clinics, public facilities (%) [indicators #3, 4, 5] Number of newly constructed (hygienic) latrines/y (No) [indicator #11]

Many Approaches (NTP3 does not specify, RSAP lists some) Demand generation (eg. CLTS) Supply strengthening (eg Sanitation Marketing) PHAST CHCs HWWS Subsidised credit

Pilot, small-scale NGO, research projects: What is the scale of the challenge? (No, %) What is the scale of the response? (No, %) What is the scale of inputs, activity? ($, staff, time) What is the scale of the progress? What goals, purpose, objectives, outcomes, impacts are proposed and planned and what methods of measurement are being used?

Draft Action Plan for Rural Sanitation

Improved and Approved Action Plan for Rural Sanitation

Structured, planned events on identified issues

Ad-hoc opportunistic events

Rural Sanitation Working Group, Quarterly meetings only 4 per year!

Task team / core group of RSWG works on specific issues

Research, pilot and NGO projects; global and regional lessons

Action Plan for Rural Sanitation, 2011-2015

Need to plan some events on specific issues to deliver outputs Need to take advantage of ad-hoc events and identify what we can get out of them Need to use the RSWG quarterly meetings (only 4 per year!) to get ideas and feedback Could designate Task Teams to work on specific issues that cannot be contracted out or done solely internally by MoH Need to draw on research, pilot and NGO projects as well as global lessons and regional experiences

Many Approaches (NTP3 does not specify, RSAP lists some) Demand generation (eg. CLTS) Supply strengthening (eg Sanitation Marketing) PHAST CHCs HWWS Subsidised credit

Pilot, small-scale NGO, research projects: What is the scale of the challenge? (No, %) What is the scale of the response? (No, %) What is the scale of inputs, activity? ($, staff, time) What is the scale of the progress? What goals, purpose, objectives, outcomes, impacts are proposed and planned and what methods of measurement are being used?