PRESENTATION

ON
EXCHANGE RATE
DETERMINATION THEORIES
PRESENTED BY
HE MA NT SACHA N
M0729
SEC- A
Introduction to Purchasing Power
Parity (PPP)
 Purchasing power parity (PPP) is a theory of exchange rate
determination and a way to compare the average costs of goods
and services between countries. The theory assumes that the
actions of importers and exporters, motivated by cross country
price differences, induces changes in the spot exchange rate. In
another vein, PPP suggests that transactions on a country's current
account, affect the value of the exchange rate on the foreign
exchange market. This contrast with the interest rate parity theory
which assumes that the actions of investors, whose transactions
are recorded on the capital account, induces changes in the
exchange rate.
 PPP theory is based on an extension and variation of the "law of
one price" as applied to the aggregate economy. To explain the
theory it is best, first, to review the idea behind the law of one price.
The Law of One Price (LoOP)
 The law of one price says that identical goods should sell for the
same price in two separate markets when there are no
transportation costs and no differential taxes applied in the two
markets. Consider the following information about movie video
tapes sold in the US and Mexican markets.
 The idea between the law of one price is that identical goods
selling in an integrated market, where there are no
transportation costs or differential taxes or subsidies, should
sell at identical prices. If different prices prevailed then there
would be profit-making opportunities by buying the good in
the low price market and reselling it in the high price market.
If entrepreneurs acted in this way, then the prices would
converge to equality.
The purchasing power parity theory is really just the law of one price
applied in the aggregate, but, with a slight twist added. If it makes
sense from the law of one price that identical goods should sell for
identical prices in different markets, then the law ought to hold for
all identical goods sold in both markets.
Conceptually this theory is sound. But this theory takes only the
movement of goods, not that of capital. Above all this theory
ignores the fact that a currency may be an instrument of payment
by other counties. In this situation, the exchange rate may evolve in
a manner that has nothing to do with the price levels of the country.
The PPP theory can be considered as an idle theory to determine
exchange rates in specific situations, such as high inflation or
monetary disturbances.
In such situations, the response of individuals to changes in value of
real and monetary assets can be expected to be strong and the
exchange rate prediction by PPP theory may turn out to be realistic.
Interest rate parity
 The interest rate parity is the basic identity that relates
interest rates and exchange rates. The identity is theoretical, and
usually follows from assumptions imposed in economics models.
There is evidence that supports as well as rejects interest rate
parity.

 Interest rate parity is an arbitrage condition which says that the

returns from borrowing in one currency, exchanging that currency
for another currency and investing in interest-bearing instruments
of the second currency, while simultaneously purchasing futures
contracts to convert the currency back at the end of the investment
period, should be equal to the returns from purchasing and holding
similar interest-bearing instruments of the first currency. If the
returns are different, investors could theoretically arbitrage and
make risk-free returns.
 According to interest rate parity the difference between the (risk free) interest
rates paid on two currencies should be equal to the differences between the spot
and forward rates.
 If interest rate parity is violated, then an arbitrage opportunity exists. The simplest
example of this is what would happen if the forward rate was the same as the spot
rate but the interest rates were different, then investors would:
 borrow in the currency with the lower rate
 convert the cash at spot rates
 enter into a forward contract to convert the cash plus the expected interest at the
same rate
 invest the money at the higher rate
 convert back through the forward contract
 repay the principal and the interest, knowing the latter will be less than the interest
received.
 Therefore, we can expect interest rate parity to apply. However, there is evidence
of forward rate bias.
Covered interest rate parity
 Assuming the arbitrage opportunity described above does not exist, then
the relationship for US dollars and pounds sterling is:
 (1 + r£)/(1+r$) = (£/$f) / (£/$s)

 where r£ is the sterling interest rate (till the date of the forward),
r$ is the dollar interest rate,
£/$f is the forward sterling to dollar rate,
£/$s is the spot sterling to dollar rate
 Unless interest rates are very high or the period considered is long, this is
a very good approximation:
 r£ = r$ + f
 where f is the forward premium: (£/$f) / (£/$s) -1
 The above relationship is derived from assuming that
covered interest arbitrage opportunities should not last, and is therefore
called covered interest rate parity.
Uncovered interest rate parity
 Assuming uncovered interest arbitrage leads us to a slightly
different relationship:
 r = r2 + E[ΔS]
 where E[ΔS] is the expected change is exchange rates.
 This is called uncovered interest rate parity.
 As the forward rate will be the market expectation of the
change in rates, this is equivalent to covered interest rate
parity - unless one is speculating on market expectations
being wrong.
 The evidence on uncovered interest rate parity is mixed, but
this paper finds evidence that it applies in the long term, although t
.
FISHER EFFECT
The FE theory suggests that foreign currencies with relatively high
interest rates will depreciate because the high nominal interest
rates reflect expected inflation. The nominal interest rate would
also incorporate the default risk of an investment .
FE uses interest rate rather than inflation rate differentials to explain
why exchange rate change over time, but it is closely related to the
PPP theory because interest rate are often highly correlated with
inflation rate. According to the Fisher Effect, nominal risk-free
interest rate contains a real rate of return and anticipated inflation.
If investors of all countries require the same real return, interest
rate differentials between countries may be the result of
differentials in expected inflation.