Professional Documents
Culture Documents
12.1
12.2
12.3
Distributive Justice
The
productivity principle asserts that each person ought to receive the monetary equivalent of what they have produced individually from our human resources (labour) and our nonhuman resources (property).
12.4
Product Exhaustion
If
any measure of productivity is to serve as a distributional principle, it must fulfill the product exhaustion criterion. The product exhaustion criterion states that if owners of all resources receive what their resources produce, then the individual shares of the total product pie must sum to 1.
12.5
2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Product Exhaustion
Consider
a firm in long-run equilibrium using 2 inputs to producing y* of output. The value of the firms output (py*), is the sum of the firms input payments (w1z1*) + (w2z2*). If, at the firm level, the product is just used up, the two must be equal. Therefore: py*=w1z1*+w2z2*
12.6
2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Product Exhaustion
Re-writing
gives: p=(w1z1*+w2z2*)/y=LAC(y*)
This
equality follows from the price being equal to minimum average cost in longrun perfectly competitive equilibrium. The product-exhaustion criteria is therefore satisfied in a competitive equilibrium.
12.7
2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
redistribution principle is at odds with the productivity principle. Redistributionists find significant economic inequalities unacceptable. They argue that wealth and income in the real world should be redistributed from rich to poor.
12.8
Redistribution of Income
Regardless
of why income distribution takes place, some methods are better than others. Many of the schemes inevitable result in a conflict between equity and efficiency. The challenge is to design economic institutions that achieve the desired distribution and minimize the resulting inefficiencies.
12.9
2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
real question regarding minimum wage legislations is, do they help the working poor? Does it achieve the desired redistribution of income? Are workers in the industry better-off? Whose income falls to make up for the rise in minimum wage income? Is inefficiency an invariable side effect?
12.10
2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
12.11
a competitive market, inefficiency is a necessary by-product of an effective minimum wage law. As labour services are no longer put to there most productive uses, either unemployment or underemployment will signal that inefficiency.
12.12
12.13
12.14
2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
12.15
12.16
2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
12.17
2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
12.18
12.19
2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
12.20
12.21
2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
1.
2.
Two sources of inefficiency arise in this model: There is unemployment equal to u in quadrant I of Figure 12.6. The allocation of workers who are employed is inefficient because the wage floor exceeds the equilibrium wage.
2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
12.22
12.23
the lump-sum mechanism is efficient, it is not practical. There is no systematic way of choosing a target indifference curve or identifying individual preferences and budgets to pinpoint recipients. As a result, maintenance policies are formulated in terms of income rather than utility (income-maintenance).
12.24
2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Income-Maintenance Programs
Income-maintenance
programs have the objective of raising the income of anyone below a targeted level of income, up to that level. In practical income-maintenance schemes, the amount of the income transfer is conditional upon the amount of the recipients earned income.
12.25
2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
12.26
12.27