3G Media Gateway Software for GSM Transcoder

Author: Supervisor: Instructor:

Mikko Mkinen Professor Raimo Kantola Lic.Sc. (Tech) Jyri Suvanen

2006 NOKIA

mikko.o.makinen@nokia.com

1.12.2006

Contents of the presentation

Objectives of the thesis

Speech transcoding in mobile networks

Role of TRAU (Transcoder and Rate Adaptation Unit) and MGW (Media Gateway) in GSM and 3G networks Digital Signal Processing (DSP) Hardware and Software (HW/SW)

Comparing TRAU and MGW software

Applying MGW software for TRAU environment Performance of the new software Conclusions

2006 NOKIA

mikko.o.makinen@nokia.com

1.12.2006

Objectives of the thesis

Problem: Two separate network elements (TRAU and MGW) are handling basically the same task i.e. transcoding speech. However, their development has been relatively independent in Nokia up to this date. Methods: Study the roles of the TRAU and the MGW unit in current and future network architectures Comparison of the MGW and the TRAU software Apply the MGW software in the TRAU hardware environment and implement needed software parts Feasibility & performance study of the new software Thesis was carried out in Nokia Networks Signal Processing System unit

2006 NOKIA

mikko.o.makinen@nokia.com

1.12.2006

Speech transcoding in mobile networks

Radio frequencies are scarce and expensive resource Speech encoding saves radio channels remarkably Traditional PCM (64kbit/s) versus HR (5.6kbit/s), FR (13kbit/s), EFR(12.2kbit/s) and AMR-NR(4.75-12.2kbit/s) Exploitation of the statistical characteristics of the human speech Short term correlation linear prediction Long term correlation fundamental period of voiced sounds Hybrid coders combination of waveform coders and vocoders Compatible interconnections towards other wireless and wireline networks usually implemented with PCM

2006 NOKIA

mikko.o.makinen@nokia.com

1.12.2006

Role of TRAU and MGW (1/3)

MS Mobile Station BTS Base Transceiver Station BSC Base Station Controller TRAU Transcoding and Rate Adaptation Unit MSC Mobile Switching Station GMSC Gateway MSC VLR Visitor Location Register HLR Home Location Register AuC Authentication Centre

EIR Equipment Identity Register

PSTN Public Switched Telephone Network PLMN Public Land Mobile Network

TRAU is a part of the GSM access network Handling FR/HR/EFR/AMR-NB to PCM conversion Most of its new markets in developing countries (plus capacity updates in developed countries)
5 mikko.o.makinen@nokia.com 1.12.2006

2006 NOKIA

Role of TRAU and MGW (2/3)

RAN Radio Access Network GERAN GSM/EDGE RAN UTRAN UMTS Terrestrial RAN CS Circuit Switched PS Packet Switched RNC Radio Network Controller

SGSN Serving GPRS Support Node

GGSN Gateway GPRS Support Node MGW Media Gateway

MGW is a part of the 3G core network (Release4) MGW handles only user plane traffic Placed behind TRAU if co-operated with the GSM/EDGE access network Handling data type conversion (IP/ATM/PCM) in addition to the media format conversion Under active product development (new features + capacity updates)
2006 NOKIA 6 mikko.o.makinen@nokia.com 1.12.2006

Role of TRAU and MGW (3/3)

Problem: Duplicate transcoders in 3G core/ GSM access network situation Expensive for the operator and multiple lossy transcodings decrease the speech quality Solution 1: Avoid tandem transcoding with end-to-end codec negotiation Tandem Free Operation (TFO) pack encoded bits inside 64kbit/s PCM stream, no bandwidth savings Transcoder Free Operation (TrFO) send encoded bits directly over an IP/ATM network, saves also bandwidth compared to 64kbit/s PCM Does not solve the problem of duplicate hardware units Solution 2: Remove separate TRAU-unit, implement Ater-interface in MGW Cost efficient Dynamic allocation of 2G/3G transcoding capabilities Unfortunately Ater-interface is proprietary and thus this solution works only in limited situations (access and core network from the same manufacturer)
7 mikko.o.makinen@nokia.com 1.12.2006

2006 NOKIA

DSP HW/SW (1/2)

Why to use specialized DSP hardware with processor specific Assembly code when commercial off-the shelf processors have higher clock rates, wider range of third party compilers/development tools/software/etc. and support for higher (more abstracted) programming languages (C/C++/Java..) that are easily ported for new hardware environments? DSP processors are superior in certain application fields (price competitive and computationally demanding functions) due to their special characteristics Separate multiply-accumulate unit (e.g. for vector products) Multiple memory fetches within single clock cycle Fixed point arithmetic Special instruction sets Minimal and power consumption effective design Skilled Assembly programmer can beat modern C-compilers anytime in small, algorithm intensive tasks Tenfold margin is not extraordinary
8 mikko.o.makinen@nokia.com 1.12.2006

2006 NOKIA

DSP HW/SW (2/2)

However, modern transcoding units have new requirements for DSP SW Size of the software has explode Dynamic functionality, lots of control oriented tasks Shorter time-to-market cycles Rapid hardware updates to increase capacity It is not possible to design each new hardware from scratch and reprogram the whole software for the new hardware Use of common and modular hardware units Separation of the hardware dependent software from others Separation of the control oriented and the algorithm intensive pieces of software Use of higher languages (mostly C) whenever its possible Use of Assembly only when really needed!
9 mikko.o.makinen@nokia.com 1.12.2006

2006 NOKIA

TRAU and MGW software comparison

The development of these units have been relatively independent due to their distinct functions and different historical background However, today the functionality set of TRAU is almost an inclusive subset of the corresponding MGW functionality set. Moreover, the MGW software offers several additional services such as the wideband AMR codec.

The whole TRAU software was originally written in Assembly although in later releases some C-code was added -> simple and effective but nowadays unmanageable, error prone and stretched to its limits Not too optimized anymore, as the current version is only translated version of the previous release (optimized for a different processor) The MGW software has a more modern layered architecture (operating system, drivers, platform, application) making it flexible, modular and portable Even more detailed separation in application part, making it possible to for example outsource the development of standard speech codecs

2006 NOKIA

10

mikko.o.makinen@nokia.com

1.12.2006

Applying MGW software for TRAU environment (1/2)

Two similar products but both have distinct markets and hardware environments, although both units use the same DSP currently (Texas Instruments TNETV3010) However, Nokia could enhance its software development and maintenance processes by reusing the more modern MGW software in TRAU unit. This is possible, as also the Assembly code is portable between units due to the same processors. Minimum target: same functionality and similar capacity Possible problems in external interfaces: MGW SW has no support for direct serial port traffic that TRAU uses for all user traffic Operation & Maintenance (O&M) interface technically very different MGWs dynamic resource control vs. TRAUs static speech coding channels
11 mikko.o.makinen@nokia.com 1.12.2006

2006 NOKIA

Applying MGW software for TRAU environment (2/2)

Only few new modules

However, lots of little changes and adjusting -> fiddly and time consuming project
Only basic call through functionality, O&M interface ignored at this stage

Simplified picture of the new Software

2006 NOKIA

12

mikko.o.makinen@nokia.com

1.12.2006

Performance of the new Software

Average MIPS consumption of an EFR speech coding channel
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Platform Serial Port Forwarder Others
Module

Clear performance advantage compared to the old TRAU SW

First channel (with fixed structures) Additional channel Old TRAU SW

Greatest difference in actual speech codecs (translated versus native code)

Possibility to even double the capacity!

MIPS

Speech codec

Total

2006 NOKIA

13

mikko.o.makinen@nokia.com

1.12.2006

Conclusions

Separate GSM transcoder unit have markets for years, although larger investments should be reconsidered thoroughly The MGW software has clear performance advantage -> more handled channels per unit or less needed DSP hardware capacity Only minor changes needed for the new software -> possible to develop in parallel with the main MGW software -> only one software to maintain More flexible software for new features or other updates. AMR-WB is a possible newcomer for GSM networks in the future. Final product decisions not made yet, but used approach seems to be very promising Further study: Implementation of the O&M interface if green light shown Future of the AMR-WB codec (in GSM networks)

2006 NOKIA

14

mikko.o.makinen@nokia.com

1.12.2006

Thank You!

Questions/Comments?

2006 NOKIA

15

mikko.o.makinen@nokia.com

1.12.2006