Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Motivation: Scenario I
Imagine traveling on a highway with traffic jam miles ahead
Data delivery latency is high High deployment cost for data collection
Can we do better?
2
Data collection and distribution in a local environment Low information delivery latency Cheap deployment and communication
Probable solutions
Vehicles are equipped with sensing, computing and wireless devices Vehicles talk to road-side infrastructure (V2I) and other vehicles (V2V) Has all the desirable properties
3
Outline
Vehicular Networks and Applications Research overview Mobility models and simulators(introduction) Data dissemination approaches and tradeoffs
Vehicular Networks
High bandwidth & Low cost device Coverage is less compared to a cellular base station
Low latency communication with vehicles Gateway to the Internet and extend connectivity Distributing time-critical data (e.g. accident notifications, traffic jam) near the affected area is efficient
5
Safety: Emergency brake light, Collision warning etc Comfort: Toll services, Parking space locator etc Commercial: Map updates, Video download, Services etc
Combination of V2V + V2I communications They face the worst case scenarios in real world
State-of-the-art
Data Dissemination
Openxc
Eclipse
Features:
I-Jetty
pure Java-based HTTP server and Java Servlet container developed as a free and open source project
FEATURES:
Simplicity Embeddability Pluggability
Proposed system
Data Dissemination
Vehicular networks need to handle large amounts of data (emergency messages, videos etc) How do we efficiently disseminate this information? Characteristics High mobility Dynamic topology Receivers are a priori unknown Large scale High density Low penetration ratio Challenges Maintaining routing tables is difficult
V2V dissemination
Flooding
16
Infostation pushes out the data to everyone Applications: Traffic alerts, Weather alerts
Why is this useful?
Drawback
Drawback
Flooding
Basic Idea
Broadcast generated and received data to neighbors Usually everyone participates in dissemination
Advantages
Key Challenges
Simple forwarding
Flooding in general
20
Take Away
V2I/I2V Dissemination Push Pull V2V Dissemination Flooding Pros Suitable for popular data Suitable for un-popular/ user-specific data Pros Can reliably & quickly distribute data Cons Not suitable for un-popular data Cross traffic incurs heavy interference, collisions Cons Not scalable for dense networks
21
System requirements
HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS: RAM-2GB SYSTEM TYPE:32-BIT OPERATING SYSTEM PROCESSOR:INTEL CORE DUO 2 SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS: WINDOWS VISTA ANDROID SDK I-JETTY OMNET++
conclusion
As it is an experimental model and some simulations are required so hence this will be help full for interaction of two cars so that they can access the data easily by using an android mobile phones.
24
References
[Nadeem06] Comparative study of data dissemination models for vanets, Mobiquitous. [Wu04a] MDDV: A Mobility-Centric Data Dissemination Algorithm for Vehicular Networks, VANET. [Korkamaz04] Urban multi-hop broadcast protocol for inter-vehicle communication systems, VANET. [Sun00] GPS-Based Message Broadcasting for Inter-Vehicle Communication, ICCPP. [Zong01] Ad Hoc Relay Wireless Networks over Moving Vehicles on Highways, Mobihoc. [Wu04b] Analytical Models for Information Propagation in Vehicle-to-Vehicle Networks, VTC. [Linda00a] Disseminating Messages among Highly Mobile Hosts based on InterVehicle Communication, IV. [Sormani06] Towards Lightweight Information Dissemination in Inter-Vehicular Networks, VANET [Zhao06] VADD-Vehicle-Assisted Data Delivery in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, INFOCOM. [Caliskan06] Decentralized Discovery of Free Parking Spaces, VANET [Basu04] Wireless Ad Hoc Discovery of Parking Meters, WAMES. [Zhao07] Data Pouring and Buffering on The Road: A New Data Dissemination Paradigm for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, Transactions on VT
25