Managerial Accounting

Weygandt, Kieso, & Kimmel

Prepared by Karleen Nordquist.. The College of St. Benedict... and St. Johns University...
with contributions by Dr. Jessica J. Frazier.. and Philip Li... Eastern Kentucky University.

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Chapter 12

Financial Statement Analysis

Chapter 12
Financial Statement Analysis
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 Understand the concept of earning power and indicate how irregular items are presented. 2 Discuss the need for comparative analysis and identify the tools of financial statement analysis. 3 Explain and apply horizontal analysis. 4 Explain and apply vertical analysis. 5 Identify and compute ratios and describe their purpose and use in analyzing a firms liquidity, solvency, and profitability. 6 Discuss the limitations of financial statement analysis.

Preview of Chapter 12
Earning Power and Irregular Items

FINANACIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS

Discontinued Operations Extraordinary Items Changes in Accounting Principle Comprehensive Income

Comparative Analysis
Horizontal Analysis Vertical Analysis

Preview of Chapter 12
Ratio Analysis
Liquidity Ratios Solvency Ratios Profitability Ratios

FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS

Limitations of Financial Analysis

Estimates Cost Alternative Accounting Methods Atypical Data Diversification

Study Objective 1

Understand the concept of earning power and indicate how irregular items are presented.

Earning Power and Irregular Items

Ultimately, the value of a company is a function of its
future cash flows. When analysts use this years net income to estimate future cash flows, they must make sure this years net income does not include irregular revenues, expenses, gains, or losses. Net income adjusted for irregular items is referred to as earning power. Earning power is the most likely level of income to be obtained in the future (to the extent this years income is a good predictor of future income.

Earning Power and Irregular Items

As an aid in the determination of earning power,
irregular items are identified on the income statement. Three types of irregular items are reported: discontinued operations, extraordinary items, and changes in accounting principle. All of these items are reported net of income taxes.

Discontinued Operations
Discontinued operations refers to the disposal of a
significant segment of a business, such as the elimination of a major class of customers or an entire activity. When the disposal of a significant segment occurs, the income statement should report both income from continuing operations and income (or loss) from discontinued operations. The income (loss) from discontinued operations consists of the income (loss) from operations and the gain (loss) on disposal of the segment.

Discontinued Operations
To illustrate, assume that Rozek Inc. has revenues of
$2.5 million and expenses of $1.7 million from continuing operations in 1999. The company therefore has income before income taxes of $800,000. During 1999 the company discontinued and sold its unprofitable chemical division. The loss in 1999 from chemical operations (net of $60,000 taxes) was $140,000, and the loss on disposal of the chemical division (net of $30,000 taxes) was $70,000.

Discontinued Operations
Assuming a 30% tax rate on income before taxes,
the income statement presentation would be as follows:
Rozek Inc. Partial Income Statement For the Year Ended December 31, 1999 Income before income taxes Income tax expense Income from continuing operations Discontinued operations Loss from operations of chemical division, net of $60,000 income tax savings $140,000 Loss from disposal of chemical division, net of $30,000 income tax savings 70,000 Net income $800,000 240,000 560,000

210,000 $350,000

Illustration 12-1

Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary items are events and transactions that meet
two conditions: They are unusual in nature. They are infrequent in occurrence. Extraordinary items are reported net of taxes in a separate section of the income statement immediately below discontinued operations. If a transaction or event meets one, but not both, of the criteria for an extraordinary item, it should be reported as a separate line item in the upper portion of the income statement, usually in the other revenues and gains or other expenses and losses section at its gross amount.

Classification of Extraordinary and Ordinary Items

Extraordinary Items
Effects of major casualties
(acts of God), if rare in the area. Expropriation (takeover of property by a foreign government. Effects of a newly enacted law or regulation, such as a condemnation action.
Condemned
Illustration 12-2

Ordinary Items
Effects of major
casualties (acts of God), frequent in the area. Write-down of inventories or write-off of receivables. Losses attributable to labor strikes. Gains or losses form sales of PP&E.

Extraordinary Items
Assume that in 1999 a revolutionary foreign government
expropriated property held as an investment by Rozek Inc.

If the loss is
$70,000 before applicable income taxes of $21,000, the income statement presentation will show a deduction of $49,000.

Rozek Inc. Partial Income Statement For the Year Ended December 31, 1999 Income before income taxes Income tax expense Income from continuing operations Discontinued operations Loss from operations of chemical division, net of $60,000 income tax savings $140,000 Loss from disposal of chemical division, net of $30,000 income tax savings 70,000 Income before extraordinary item Extraordinary item Expropriation of investment, net of $21,000 income tax savings Net income

$800,000 240,000 560,000

210,000 350,000

49,000 $301,000

Illustration 12-3

Changes in Accounting Principle

For ease of comparison, financial statements are
expected to be prepared on a basis consistent with that used for the preceding period. When a choice of principles is available, the principal initially chosen should be applied consistently from period to period. A change in accounting principle occurs when the principle used in the current year is different from the one used in the preceding year.

Changes in Accounting Principle

A change is permitted, when

management can show that the new principle is

preferable to the old principle, and the effects of the change are clearly disclosed in the income statement. Two examples are a change in depreciation methods (such as declining-balance to straight-line) and a change in inventory costing methods (such as FIFO to average cost). Sometimes a change in accounting principle is mandated by FASB.

Changes in Accounting Principle

A change in accounting principle affects reporting
in two ways: The new principle should be used in reporting the results of operations of the current year. The cumulative effect of the change on all prior-year income statements should be disclosed net of applicable taxes in a special section immediately preceding Net Income.

Changes in Accounting Principle

Assume at the beginning of 1999, Rozek Inc. changes
from the straight-line method to the declining-balance method for equipment purchased on January 1, 1996. The cumulative effect on prior-year income statements (statements for 1996-1998) is to increase depreciation expense and decrease income before income taxes by $24,000. If there is a 30% tax rate, the net-of-tax effect of the change is $16,800 ($24,000 x 70%). The income statement is presented on the next slide.

Changes in Accounting Principle

Rozek Inc. Partial Income Statement For the Year Ended December 31, 1999 Income before income taxes $800,000 Income tax expense 240,000 Income from continuing operations 560,000 Discontinued operations Loss from operations of chemical division, net of $60,000 income tax savings $140,000 Loss from disposal of chemical division, net of $30,000 income tax savings 70,000 210,000 Income before extraordinary item 350,000 Extraordinary item Expropriation of investment, net of $21,000 income tax savings 49,000 Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle Effect on prior years of change in depreciation method, net of $7,200 income tax savings 16,800 Net income $284,200 Illustration 12-4

Comprehensive Income
Although most revenues, expenses, gains, and losses
recognized during the period are included in net income, specific exceptions to this practice have developed. Certain items, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, now bypass income and are reported directly in stockholders equity.

(Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities

are excluded from net income because disclosing them separately reduces the volatility of net income due to fluctuations in fair value, yet informs the financial statement user of the gain or loss that would be incurred if the securities were sold at fair value.)

Comprehensive Income
Analysts have expressed concern that the number
of items bypassing the income statement has increased significantly, which has reduced the usefulness of the income statement. To address this concern, the FASB now requires that, in addition to reporting net income, a company must also report comprehensive income.

Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes all changes in
stockholders' equity during a period except those resulting from investments by stockholders and distributions to stockholders. A number of alternative formats for reporting comprehensive income are allowed. These formats are discussed in advanced accounting classes.

Study Objective 2

Discuss the need for comparative analysis and identify the tools of financial statement analysis.

Comparative Analysis
Every item reported in a financial statement has
significance: Its inclusion indicates that the item exists at a given time and in a certain quantity. For example, if Iomega Corporation reports $243.8 million on its balance sheet as cash, it is known that Iomega did have cash and its quantity was $243.8 million. But whether that represents an increase over prior years, or whether it is adequate for the companys needs cannot be determined from that amount alone. The amount must be compared with other financial data to perceive its significance.

Comparative Analysis
Three types of comparisons increase the decision usefulness of financial information: Intracompany basis: Comparisons within a company are often useful to detect changes in financial relationships and significant trends. Industry averages: Comparisons with industry averages provide information about a companys relative position with the industry. Intercompany basis: Comparisons with other companies provide insight into a companys competitive position.

Comparative Analysis
Three basic tools are used in financial statement analysis to highlight the significance of financial statement data: Horizontal analysis Vertical analysis Ratio analysis

Study Objective 3

Explain and apply horizontal analysis.

Horizontal Analysis
Horizontal analysis (also known as trend
analysis) is a technique for evaluating a series of financial statement data over a period of time. The purpose of horizontal analysis is to determine whether an increase or decrease has taken place. The increase or decrease can be expressed as either an amount, or a percentage of a base-year amount.

Horizontal Analysis
To illustrate horizontal analysis, the most recent net sales
figures (in millions) of Kellogg Company are shown below:
1997 $6,830.1 1996 $6,676.6 1995 $7,003.7 1994 $6,562.0 1993 $6,295.4

If 1993 is assumed to be the base year, percentage

increases/decreases from this base-period amount can be computed using the formula shown below. Illustration 12-5
Change since base period

Current-year amount Base-year amount Base-year amount

For example, net sales for Kellogg increased by almost 8.5%

[($6,830.1 - $6,295.4)/$6,295.4] from 1993 to 1997. Net sales horizontal analysis for all 5 years is shown on the next slide.

Horizontal Analysis
Kellogg Company Net Sales (in millions) Base Period 1993 1997 $6,830.1 108.5% 1996 $6,676.6 106.1% 1995 $7,003.7 111.3% 1994 $6,562.0 104.2% 1993 $6,295.4 100%

Illustration 12-6

To further illustrate horizontal analysis, Kelloggs 2year condensed balance sheets and income statements for 1996 and 1997 with dollar and percentage changes are shown on the following two slides.

Kellogg Company, Inc. Condensed Balance Sheets (in millions) December 31

Assets Current assets Plant assets (net) Other assets Total assets 1997 $1,467.7 2,773.3 636.6 $4,877.6 1996 $1,528.6 2,932.9 588.5 $5,050.0 Increase/Decrease during 1997 Amount Percent $ (60.9) (4.0)% (159.6) (5.4) 48.1 8.2 $ (172.4) (3.4)

Liabilities and Stockholders Equity Current liabilities $1,657.3 $2,199.0 $ (541.7) Long-term liabilities 2,222.8 1,568.6 654.2 Total liabilities 3,880.1 3,767.6 112.5 Stockholders Equity Common stock 196.3 201.8 (5.5) Retained earnings and other 958.5 3,984.0 (3,025.5) Treasury stock (cost) (157.3) (2,903.4) 2,746.1 Total stockholders equity 997.5 1,282.4 (284.9) Total liabilities and stockholders equity $4,877.6 $5,050.0 $ (172.4)

(24.6) 41.7 3.0

(2.7) (76.0) (94.6) (22.2) (3.4)%

Illustration 12-7

Kellogg Company, Inc. Condensed Income Statements (in millions) December 31

1997 $6,830.1 3,270.1 3,560.0 2,366.8 184.1 1,009.1 108.3 3.7 904.5 340.5 564.0 (18.0) 546.0 Increase/Decrease during 1997 1996 Amount Percent $6,676.6 $153.5 2.3% 3,122.9 147.2 4.7 3,553.7 6.3 0.2 2,458.7 (91.9) (3.7) 136.1 48.0 35.3 958.9 50.2 5.2 65.6 42.7 65.1 (33.4) (37.1) 859.9 328.9 531.0 $ 531.0 44.6 11.6 33.0 (18.0) $ 15.0 5.2 3.5 6.2 2.8%

Net sales Cost of goods sold Gross profit Selling & administrative expense Nonrecurring charges Income from operations Interest expense Other income(expense), net Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change Income taxes Income before cumulative effect of accounting change Cumulative effect of accounting change (net) Net income $

Illustration 12-8

Horizontal Analysis: Balance Sheet

The comparative balance sheets show that a number of changes occurred in Kelloggs financial position from 1996 to 1997. In the assets section, current assets decreased $60.9 million, or 4.0% ($60.9 $1,528.6), plant assets (net) decreased $159.6, or 5.4%, and other assets increased 8.2%. In the liabilities section, current liabilities decreased $541.7, or 24.6%, while long-term liabilities increased $654.2, or 41.7%. In the stockholders equity section, retained earnings decreased $3,025.5, or 75.9%. The decrease in retained earnings and treasury stock is due to a retirement of a significant number of shares of treasury stock.

Horizontal Analysis: Income Statement

Horizontal analysis of the income statements shows these changes: Net sales increased $153.5, or 2.3% ($153.5 $6.676.6). Cost of goods sold increased $147.2, or 4.7%. Selling and administrative expenses decreased $91.9, or 3.7%. Overall, gross profit increased $6.2 million, or less than 1%, and net income increased 2.8%. The increase in net income can be primarily attributed to the decrease in selling and administrative expenses.

Horizontal Analysis: Complications

The measurement of changes from period to period in percentages is relatively straightforward and quite useful. However, complications can arise in performing the computations. If an item has no value in a base year or preceding year, no percentage change can be computed. Also, if a negative amount appears in the base or preceding period, and a positive amount exists the following year, or vice versa, no percentage change can be computed. For example, no percentage change could be calculated for the cumulative effect in Kelloggs income statement.

Study Objective 4

Describe and apply vertical analysis.

Vertical Analysis
Vertical analysis is a technique for evaluating
financial statement data that expresses each item in a financial statement as a percent of a base amount. Total assets is always the base amount in vertical analysis of a balance sheet. Net sales is always the base amount in vertical analysis of an income statement.

Vertical Analysis
Vertical analysis shows the relative size of each
category on the financial statements.

To further illustrate vertical analysis, Kelloggs 2year condensed balance sheets and income statements for 1996 and 1997 with vertical analysis percentages are shown on the following two slides.

Kellogg Company, Inc. Condensed Balance Sheets (in millions) December 31

Assets Current assets Plant assets (net) Other assets Total assets

1997 Amount Percent $1,467.7 30.1% 2,773.3 56.9 636.6 13.0 $4,877.6 100.0%

1996 Amount Percent $1,528.6 30.3% 2,932.9 58.0 588.5 11.7 $5,050.0 100.0%

Liabilities and Stockholders Equity Current liabilities $1,657.3 Long-term liabilities 2,222.8 Total liabilities 3,880.1 Stockholders Equity Common stock 196.3 Retained earnings and other 958.5 Treasury stock (cost) (157.3) Total stockholders equity 997.5 Total liabilities and stockholders equity $4,877.6

34.0% 45.6 79.6 4.0 19.6 (3.2) 20.4 100.0%

$2,199.0 1,568.6 3,767.6 201.8 3,984.0 (2,903.4) 1,282.4 $5,050.0

43.5% 31.3 74.6 4.0 78.9 (57.5) 25.4 100.0%

Illustration 12-9

Kellogg Company, Inc. Condensed Income Statements (in millions) December 31

1997 Amount Percent $6,830.1 100.0% 3,270.1 47.9 3,560.0 52.1 2,366.8 34.6 184.1 2.7 1,009.1 14.8 108.3 1.6 3.7 .1
904.5 340.5 564.0 (18.0) 546.0 13.3 5.0 8.3 (.3) 8.0%

Net sales Cost of goods sold Gross profit Selling & administrative expense Nonrecurring charges Income from operations Interest expense Other income(expense), net Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change Income taxes Income before cumulative effect of accounting change Cumulative effect of accounting change (net) Net income $

1996 Amount Percent $6,676.6 100.0% 3,122.9 46.8 3,553.7 53.2 2,458.7 36.8 136.1 2.0 958.9 14.4 65.6 1.0 (33.4) (.5)
859.9 328.9 531.0 $ 531.0 12.9 4.9 8.0 8.0%

Illustration 12-10

Vertical Analysis: Balance Sheet

Note the following changes in Kelloggs financial position. Current assets decreased slightly from 30.3% to 30.1% of total assets from 1996 to 1997. Plant assets (net) decreased from 58.0% to 56.9% of total assets. Current liabilities went down from 43.5% to 34.0%, while long-term liabilities went up from 31.1% to 45.6% of total liabilities and stockholders equity. Significantly, during the same year, stockholders equity decreased from 25.4% to 20.4%. Thus, the company shifted toward a heavier reliance on debt financing, both by using more long-term debt and by reducing the amount of outstanding equity.

Vertical Analysis: Income Statement

Vertical analysis of the income statements reveals: Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales increased 1.1% (from 46.8% to 47.9%) while selling and administrative expenses decreased 2.2% (from 36.8% to 34.6%). Even with these changes, net income as a percent of net sales remained the same, yet net income actually increased $15 million.

Vertical Analysis
As shown from the preceding example, vertical
analysis shows the relative size of each category on the financial statements. Vertical analysis also enables the comparison of companies of different sizes. This benefit of vertical analysis is evident from its alternative name: common-size analysis. As an example, see the following vertical analysis comparing Kelloggs income statement with that of General Mills, Inc., one of Kelloggs competitors.

Condensed Income Statements For the Year Ended December 31, 1997 (in millions)
Kellogg Company Amount Percent $6,830.1 100.0% 3,270.1 47.9 3,560.0 52.1 2,366.8 34.6 184.1 2.7 1,009.1 14.8 108.3 1.6 3.7 .1
904.5 340.5 564.0 (18.0) 546.0 13.3 5.0 8.3 (.3) 8.0%

Net sales Cost of goods sold Gross profit Selling & administrative expense Nonrecurring charges Income from operations Interest expense Other income(expense), net Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change Income taxes Income before cumulative effect of accounting change Cumulative effect of accounting change (net) Net income $

General Mills, Inc. Amount Percent $5,609.3 100.0% 2,328.4 41.5 3,280.9 58.5 2,422.0 43.2 48.4 .9 810.5 14.4 100.5 1.8 (6.3) (.1)
703.7 258.3 445.4 $ 445.4 12.5 4.6 7.9 7.9%

Illustration 12-10

Vertical Analysis: Intercompany

Although Kelloggs net sales are $1,220.8 million (22%) greater than the net sales of General Mills, vertical analysis eliminates this difference and the companies can be compared to each other. Kelloggs gross profit is 52.1% as a percentage of net sales, versus 58.5% for General Mills. This is due to Kelloggs cost of goods sold being 6.4% higher (47.9% to 41.5%) than General Mills. Yet net income as a percent of sales is very close (8% for Kellogg and 7.9% for General Mills). Kellogg achieves this in spite of its lower gross profit percentage because its selling and administrative expenses are 8.6% lower than General Mills.

Study Objective 5

Identify and compute ratios and describe their purpose and use in analyzing a firms liquidity, solvency, and profitability.

Ratio Analysis
As a tool of analysis, ratios can provide clues
about underlying conditions that may not be apparent from an inspection of the individual components of a particular ratio. A single ratio by itself is not very meaningful. Accordingly, the following ratio comparisons should be made. Intracompany comparisons, Intercompany comparisons, and Industry averages comparisons.

Ratio Analysis
For analysis of the primary financial statements, ratios can be classified into three types: Liquidity ratios: measures of the short-term ability of the enterprise to pay its maturing obligations and to meet unexpected needs for cash Solvency ratios: measures of the ability of the enterprise to survive over a long period of time Profitability ratios: measures of the income or operating success of an enterprise for a given period of time

Liquidity Ratios
Once again, liquidity ratios measure the
short-term ability of the enterprise to pay its maturing obligations and to meet unexpected needs for cash. Short-term creditors such as bankers and suppliers are particularly interested in assessing liquidity.

Liquidity Ratios
The measures that can be used to determine the enterprise's short-term debt paying ability are: the current ratio, the acid-test ratio, the current cash debt coverage ratio, the receivables turnover ratio, the average collection period, the inventory turnover ratio, and the average days in inventory.

Current Ratio
The current ratio expresses the relationship of
current assets to current liabilities and is computed by the following formula:

Current Ratio

Current Assets Current Liabilities

Current Ratio
The current ratio is widely used for evaluating a
company's liquidity and short-term debt-paying ability. The current ratio does not take into account the composition of the current assets. A satisfactory current ratio does not disclose that portion of the current assets that may be tied up in slow-moving inventory. This weakness is addressed by the next ratio.

Acid-test Ratio
The acid-test ratio or quick ratio is a measure of
a company's immediate short-term liquidity.

Acid-Test or Quick Ratio

Marketable Net Cash + Securities +Receivables Current Liabilities

Acid-test Ratio
The acid-test ratio is an important complement to
the current ratio. The ratio does not include inventory or prepaid expenses. Cash, marketable securities, and receivables are highly liquid compared with inventory and prepaid expenses. Inventory may not be readily salable, and the prepaid expenses may not be transferable to others.

Current Cash Debt Coverage Ratio

A disadvantage of the current and acid-test ratios is that they
use year-end balances of current assets and liabilities. These year-end balances may not be representative of the companys position during most of the year. The current cash debt coverage ratio partially corrects for this problem.
Current Cash Debt Coverage Ratio

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities Average Current Liabilities

Because it uses net cash provided by operating activities rather

than a balance at one point in time, it may provide a better representation of liquidity.

Receivables Turnover Ratio

The ratio used to measure the liquidity of the
receivables is the receivables turnover ratio, which measures the number of times, on average, receivables are collected during the period.
Receivables Turnover Ratio

Net credit sales Average net receivables

Average Collection Period

A popular variant of the receivables turnover ratio
converts it into an average collection period in days.
Average Collection Period

365 days Receivables turnover ratio

Analysts frequently use the average collection

period to assess the effectiveness of a companys credit and collection policies. The general rule is that the collection period should not greatly exceed the credit term period.

Inventory Turnover Ratio

The inventory turnover ratio measures the
number of times on average the inventory is sold during the period. Its purpose is to measure the liquidity of the inventory. Unless seasonal factors are significant, average inventory can be computed from the beginning and ending balances.
Inventory Turnover Ratio

Cost of goods sold Average inventory

Inventory Turnover Ratio

Generally, the faster the inventory turnover, the
less cash is tied up in inventory and the less the chance of inventory becoming obsolete. Of course, a downside of high inventory turnover is that the company can run out of inventory when it is needed.

Average Days in Inventory

A variant of the inventory turnover ratio is the
average days in inventory, which measures the average number of days it takes to sell inventory.
Average Days in Inventory

365 days Inventory turnover ratio

Inventory turnovers vary considerably among

industries. Within a company there may be significant differences in inventory turnover among different types of products.

Solvency Ratios
Once again, solvency ratios measure
the ability of the enterprise to survive over a long period of time. Long-term creditors and stockholders are interested in a company's long-run solvency, particularly its ability to pay interest as it comes due and to repay the face value of the debt at maturity.

Solvency Ratios
The following ratios provide information about a companys debt-paying ability: debt to total assets ratio times interest earned ratio cash debt coverage ratio The following ratio provides information about the companys solvency and its ability to pay additional dividends or invest in new projects. free cash flow

Debt to Total Assets Ratio

The debt to total assets ratio measures the
percentage of the total assets provided by creditors.
Debt to Total Assets Ratio

Total debt Total assets

Debt to Total Assets Ratio

The debt to total assets ratio indicates the degree
of leveraging; it provides some indication of the companys ability to withstand losses without impairing the interests of its creditors. The higher the percentage of debt to total assets, the greater the risk that the company may be unable to meet its maturing obligations. The lower the ratio, the more equity buffer is available to creditors if the company becomes insolvent.

Times Interest Earned Ratio

The times interest earned ratio (also called
interest coverage) indicates the companys ability to meet interest payments as they come due.
Times Interest Earned Ratio

Income before interest expense and income taxes Interest expense

Note that this ratio uses income before interest

expense and income taxes because this amount represents what is available to cover interest.

Cash Debt Coverage Ratio

The ratio of net cash provided by operating
activities to average total liabilities, called the cash debt coverage ratio, is a cash-basis measure of solvency.
Cash Debt Coverage Ratio

Net cash provided by operating activities Average total liabilities

This ratio indicates a companys ability to repay

its liabilities from cash generated from operating activities without having to liquidate the assets used in operations.

Free Cash Flow

One indication of a companys solvency, as well
as of its ability to pay dividends or expand operations, is the amount of excess cash it generated after investing to maintain its current productive capacity and paying dividends. This measure is referred to as free cash flow.
Free Cash Flow

Net cash provided by operating activities

Capital expenditures

Dividends paid

This ratio was introduced in Chapter 11.

Profitability Ratios
Once again, profitability ratios measure the
income or operating success of a company for a given period. A companys income, or the lack of it, affects its ability to obtain debt and equity financing, its liquidity position, and its ability to grow. As a consequence, creditors and investors alike are interested in evaluating profitability. Profitability is frequently used as the ultimate test of managements operating effectiveness.

Profitability Ratios
In addition to the measures shown on the next slide (in order to illustrate the relationships among them), some profitability measures include: cash return on sales ratio, earnings per share, price-earnings ratio, and payout ratio.

Relationships Among Profitability Measures

Gross profit rate Profit margin ratio Return on assets ratio Asset turnover ratio Operating expenses to sales ratio

Return on common stockholders equity

Leverage (debt to total asset ratio)

Illustration 12-23

Return on Common Stockholders Equity Ratio

A widely used measure of profitability from the
common stockholders viewpoint is the return on common stockholders equity ratio (ROE). This ratio shows how many dollars of net income were earned for each dollar invested by the owners.
Return on Common Stockholders Equity

Income available to common stockholders Average common stockholders equity

Income available to common stockholders is net

income minus any preferred stock dividends.

Return on Assets Ratio

The return on common stockholders equity
ratio is affected by two factors: the return on assets ratio (ROA) and the degree of leverage. The return on assets ratio measures the overall profitability of assets in terms of the rate earned on each dollar invested in assets.
Return on Assets Ratio

Net income Average total assets

Return on Assets Ratio

Leveraging or trading on the equity at a gain
means that the company has borrowed money by issuing bonds or notes at a lower rate of interest than it is able to earn by using the borrowed money. Leverage is simply trying to use money supplied by nonowners to increase the return to owners. Leverage is a two-way street, however. A company can earn less than it pays on its borrowed funds, i.e., trade on the equity at a loss.

Profit Margin Ratio

The return on assets ratio is affected by two factors, the first
of which is the profit margin ratio. The profit margin ratio, or rate of return on sales, is a measure of the percentage of each dollar of sales that results in income.

Profit Margin Ratio

Net income Net sales

High-volume (high inventory turnover) enterprises such as

grocery stores generally experience low profit margins, whereas low-volume enterprises such as jewelry stores have high profit margins.

Asset Turnover Ratio

The other factor that affects the return on assets
ratio is the asset turnover ratio. This ratio measures how efficiently a company uses it assets to generate sales.
Asset Turnover Ratio

Net sales Average total assets

Asset turnover ratios also vary considerably

among industries.

Gross Profit Rate

Two factors strongly influence the profit margin
ratio. One is the gross profit rate. This rate indicates a companys ability to maintain an adequate selling price above its costs.
Gross Profit Rate

Gross profit Net sales

As an industry becomes more competitive, this rate

declines. Gross profit rates should be closely monitored over time.

Operating Expenses to Sales Ratio

The operating expenses to sales ratio is the other
factor that directly affects the profit margin ratio. Management can influence a companys profitability by maintaining adequate prices, cutting expenses, or both. This ratio measures the costs incurred to support each dollar of sales.
Operating Expenses to Sales Ratio

Operating expenses Net sales

Cash Return on Sales Ratio

The profit margin ratio discussed earlier is an accrual-based
ratio using net income as a numerator. The cash-basis counterpart to that ratio is the cash return on sales ratio, which uses net cash provided by operating activities as the numerator. The difference between these two ratios should be explainable as differences between accrual accounting and cash-basis accounting, such as differences in the timing of revenue and expense recognition.
Cash Return on Sales Ratio

Net cash provided by operating activities Net sales

Earnings per Share (EPS)

Stockholders usually think in terms of the number
of shares they own or plan to own. Expressing net income earned on a per share basis provides a useful perspective for determining profitability. Earnings per share is a measure of the net income earned on each share of common stock.
Earnings per Share

Income available to commons shareholders Average number of outstanding common shares

Earnings per Share (EPS)

Notice when the term net income per share or
earnings per share is used it refers to the amount of net income applicable to each share of common stock. Therefore, if there are preferred dividends declared for the period, they must be deducted from net income to arrive at income available to the common stockholders. Intercompany and industry comparisons are not normally meaningful for EPS because of the wide variations in the number of shares outstanding among companies.

Price-earnings Ratio
The price-earnings ratio (P-E ratio) is an oftquoted statistic that measure the ratio of the market price of each share of common stock to the EPS. The P-E ratio is a reflection of investors assessments of a companys future earnings.
Priceearnings Ratio

Stock price Earnings per share

Payout Ratio
The payout ratio measures the percentage of
earnings distributed in the form of cash dividends.
Payout Ratio

Cash dividends Net income

Companies that have high growth rates are

characterized by low payout ratios because they reinvest most of the net income in the business. Management has some control over the amount of dividends paid each year, and companies are generally reluctant to reduce a dividend below the amount paid in a previous year.

Ratio Analysis
In terms of the types of financial information
available and the ratios used by various industries, what this textbook has covered is just the tip of the iceberg compared to the vast databases and types of ratio analysis that are available. The availability is not a problem. The real trick is to be discriminating enough to perform relevant analysis and select pertinent comparative data.

Study Objective 6

Discuss the limitations of financial statement analysis.

Limitations of Financial Analysis

Horizontal, vertical, and ratio analysis are
frequently used in making significant business decisions. One should be aware of some of the limitations of these tools and of the financial statements on which they are based.
Caution

Estimates
Financial statements contain numerous estimates. Estimates are used, for example, in determining
the allowance for uncollectible receivables, periodic depreciation, the costs of warranties, and contingent losses. To the extent that these estimates are inaccurate, the financial ratios and percentages are also inaccurate.

Cost
Traditional financial statements are based on
historical cost and are not adjusted for price level changes. Comparisons of unadjusted financial data from different periods may be rendered invalid by significant inflation or deflation. Some assets such as property, plant, and equipment might be many years old. The cost at which they are shown on the balance sheet might be significantly lower than current market value.

Alternative Accounting Methods

Variations among companies in the application of
GAAP may hamper comparability. For example, one company may use the FIFO method of inventory costing, while another company in the same industry may use LIFO. If the inventory is significant for both companies, it is unlikely that their current ratios are comparable.
Caution

Alternative Accounting Methods

In addition to differences in inventory costing
methods, differences also exist in reporting such items as depreciation, depletion, and amortization. Although these differences in accounting methods might be detectable from reading the notes to the financial statements, adjusting the financial data to compensate for the different methods is difficult, if not impossible, in some cases.
Caution

Atypical Data
Fiscal year-end data may not be typical of a
company's financial condition during the year. Firms frequently establish a fiscal year-end that coincides with the low point in their operating activity or inventory level. Therefore, certain account balances may not be representative of the balances in the accounts during the year. Caution

Diversification
Diversification in American industry also limits the
usefulness of financial analysis. Many firms are so diverse they cannot be classified by industry. When companies have significant operations in different lines of business, they are required to report additional disclosures in a segmental data note to their financial statements. Many analysts say the segmental information is the most important data in the financial statements because without it, comparison of diversified companies is very difficult.

Copyright
Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that named in Section 117 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the express written permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. Request for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his/her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The Publisher assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages, caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information contained herein.

Chapter 12
Financial Statement Analysis