You are on page 1of 88

The Theory of Constraints

Fundamental Exam Review


TOC Thinking Processes Segment

James R. Holt, Ph.D., PE


Professor jholt@wsu.edu http://www.engrmgt.wsu.edu/ Engineering & Technology Washington State University-2010 1 Management

TOCICO Segmented Fundamentals Exam


Fundamentals Certificate Multiple Choice Exam (Identify, Exploit, Subordinate, Elevate, Go to Step 1)

Fundamentals Certificate of

TOC Philosophy

Fundamentals Certificate of TOC Thinking

Fundamentals
Certificate of

Fundamentals
Certificate of

Processes Inherent Potential Inherent Simplicity Inherent Win-Win Five Focusing Steps Three Questions Conflict Cloud Negative Branch Ambitious Target

TOC Applications

TOC Finance & Measures T, I, OE PQ Type Problem

DBR Project Management Replenishment

Washington State University-2010

Topics in TOC Thinking Process



Cause and Effect Evaporating Cloud Surfacing Assumptions Invalidating Assumptions Negative Branch Reservation Overcoming Obstacles (PRT) Categories of Legitimate Reservation Layers of Resistance

Washington State University-2010

TOC Thinking Process Elements


Two types of Logic (in Natural Language)
Sufficiency Logic If , Then . In order to , There must be .Necessary Logic

Logical Causality Tools used to Answer the three questions:


What to Change? What to Change to? How to Cause the Change?

TOC is a Systemic Thinking Process.


There are a set of rules to guide and check validity. Could be called Visual Thinking.
Washington State University-2010 4

Everyone Can Think


Goal:
Lower the Ball yet keep it attached.

Minimize: Y subject to: (X-1)^2+(Y-8)^2<=24 (X-3)^2+(Y-8)^2<=14 (X-5)^2+(Y-8)^2<=2 (X-7)^2+(Y-8)^2<=22 (X-9)^2+(Y-8)^2<=26

Y-> X->

Washington State University-2010

The Real World

My View of my World

Washington State University-2010

Thinking Time
We all think! Its what we do! Our minds are like CPUs. They keep on running

and running and running We feel uncomfortable if we dont have thoughts in our head. Thats why junk TV still survives. We feel uncomfortable if we start thinking the wrong thoughts Thats why there are magazines in Doctors offices!
Washington State University-2010 7

Thinking Experiment
Get out a pencil and paper. Wait for the starting signal. Then, Work really hard at not thinking for One
Minute!

GO!
Washington State University-2010 8

QUICK!
Write down every thought you had in the last
minute! Jot down a word to catch the thought you had Capture as many as possible.

Washington State University-2010

How Many Thoughts did you have in 1 Minute?


In the production world, we would call recurring thoughts RE-WORK! How many of those thoughts have you had before? 40%, 60%, 80%?

Probable #

12

15

18

Number of thoughts
10

Washington State University-2010

Improving our Mental Throughput


We need to increase our mental effectiveness We need to tie together the stray pieces so we
dont have to deal with individual thoughts We need to get the whole picture, solve it, and move on.

Washington State University-2010

11

What is this?

Washington State University-2010

12

Jonathans Family

Washington State University-2010

13

Thinking Process Tools


The Basic Set of Thinking Process Tools Include:
Current Reality Tree Evaporating Cloud All of these tools Future Reality Tree Negative Branch Reservation are Scrutinized by the Pre-Requisite Tree Categories of Transition Tree Legitimate Derivatives Tools: Reservation. Three Cloud Approach Chronic Conflict Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam Layers of Resistance
Washington State University-2010 14

For Fun!
In order to understand the function and power of
the Thinking Process Tools

Lets examine a Thinking Process Example.


One that is fairly well known by most people One that is not well solved by most people

Marital Strife

Washington State University-2010

15

First the Approach: The Thinking Process


What to Change?
UDEs

UDEs
UDEs UDEs UDEs UDEs
Arrows are Logical Connections are Tail Head: If , Then .

Find the cause of the UnDesirable Effects - UDEs.

UDEs UDEs

Change (Remove) the Core Problem.

Core Problem

Washington State University-2010

16

Find Whats Blocking the Solution


What to Change To? Necessary Condition Prerequisite
Arrows are Logical Connections are Head Tail: In Order to , Must have .

Goal

Injection that invalidates the assumption

Necessary Condition

Prerequisite

Assumptions that explain the necessary Thinking Process elements included connection.
in the Fundamentals Exam
Washington State University-2010 17

Achieving the Solution

How to Cause the Change?

DE DE DE DE DE
Key Action

DE

DE
Key Action

Key Action

DE

Washington State University-2010

18

Marital Strife UnDesirable Effects


Lack of Affection Infidelity Unequal Workload Little Support Lack of Trust

One Carries Excessive Load Frequent Disagreements

Lack of Compassion

Difference of Opinion
19

Washington State University-2010

Story - Trust
1. My spouse doesnt come home when I expect him (her). This is happening more and more. The stories seem to be weaker and weaker. I want to trust my spouse. But I dont want to be hurt.

My spouse feels free from my bondage


I feel good about my marriage I dont get hurt
Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam

I trust my spouse at all times

I dont trust my spouse


20

Washington State University-2010

Story - Support
2. My spouse is deeply involved in ______. He/she expects me to support him/her by taking care of __________ while he/she is gone. I dont mind doing it, but it leaves me little time for my own hobbies.

We use our time well

My spouse can do his/her own thing

Give lots of support

I have time for myself


Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam
Washington State University-2010

Give little support

21

Story-Workload
3. My spouse is in a stressful job and at a critical point in his/her career. It seems like this critical point is getting longer and longer. In the mean time, I have to do my job and hold down the domestic duties too!

I survive my Job We both Achieve My spouse gets ahead

We balance our domestic workload

Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam

We have unequal workload


22

Washington State University-2010

Generic Conflict (a consolidated Evaporating Cloud)


1. Spouse freedom 2. Spouse does own thing 3. Spouse gets ahead 1. Feel Good 2. Use Time Effective 3. Achieve 1. Trust 2. Support 3. Unequal work

Happy Marriage

My Spouse is Happy

My spouse does what he/she wants

I am Happy
1. Im not hurt 2. Time for me 3. I Survive Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam

My spouse doesnt get what he/she wants


1. Lack of Trust 2. Lack of Support 3. Balanced work
23

Washington State University-2010

Core Conflict Core Problem


I am often slighted

What to Change?

We have different goals


There is pressure to give my spouse does what he/she wants The things my spouse wants are important to our marriage Our wants are different My Spouse needs to be happy

Often, my spouse takes second place There is pressure not to give what he/she wants I have real needs

I need to be happy

I not happy unless my spouse is happy

We want a Happy Marriage

My personal feelings are important


24

Washington State University-2010

The Current Reality Tree Results of the Core Conflict


Infidelity Lack of Affection Loss of trust

Lack of Compassion Lack of support Time Excessive burdens continues Unequal workload Things need to be done Different people have different levels of importance Different Opinions We have different goals
Washington State University-2010 25

Frequent arguments

A Potential Future Desirale Effects (DEs)


We have a close We have complete confidence relationship We share the workload

We share our burdens


We rarely disagree on important matters We really understand each other

Committed to each other

We support each other

Caring Relationship

Washington State University-2010

26

Starting Injection
My spouse and I share common goals, objectives and direction in the important aspects of our lives.

Washington State University-2010

27

Start of the Future


We are working towards our common goals/direction

Spouse is working to our common goals

My spouse works towards spouses goals

We have common goals, objectives and direction in the important aspects My Spouse of our lives. needs to I need to be Happy be Happy

Im working to our common goals

I work toward my goals

I not happy unless my spouse is happy

We want a Happy Marriage


Washington State University-2010

My personal feelings are important


28

More Actions Needed


We have complete confidence We share our burdens We rarely disagree We share the workload We really understand each other

We have a close relationship

We support each other


We have a Caring Relationship

We are working towards our common goals/direction


Washington State University-2010 29

A Possible Nice Future Reality Tree


What to Change to?
We have complete confidence in each other We share a common set of moral virtues

We have a close relationship We share our burdens We rarely disagree We have good communication We share the workload We really understand each other

We support each other Caring Relationship We realize we need each other to reach our common goals

We make it a point to communicate (good & bad)

We are working towards our common goals/direction


Washington State University-2010

30

Negative Branch Reservation


The Good Side The Bad Side

My spouses goals are achieved.

Most of my spouses goals are our common goals Im working to our common goals

I cant achieve my goals Im not working on my goals

My spouse works towards spouses goals

My goals take a lot I am very of time We have common goals, objectives and direction in the busy important aspects of our lives.
31

Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam


Washington State University-2010

Negative Branch Reservation


The Good Side The Bad Side

I feel good about I cant achieve Most of my my progress my goals spouses goals are our common goals IIm work on our goals Im working to not working AND my goals our common on my goals goals My goals My spouse take a lot works am very We have common goals, IIwork on of time towards objectives and direction in the busy things I spouses I finally important aspects of our lives. value goals prioritize Thinking Process elements included my life
in the Fundamentals Exam
Washington State University-2010 32

My spouses goals are achieved.

OK, Injections, But HOW? How to Cause the Change?


We realize we need each other to reach our common goals We make it a point to communicate (good & bad)

Create the PreRequisite Tree (Ambitious Target Tree). Practice on this Injection
We share a common set of moral virtues

My spouse works towards spouses goals

We have common goals, objectives and direction in the important aspects of our lives.

I work toward my goals I finally prioritize my life


33

Washington State University-2010

We share a common set of moral virtues


Obstacles Preventing
Its a gray world out there. (I cant tell right from wrong)

Intermediate Objectives

We dont want to change.


Values change according to the circumstances. We have different backgrounds. Our desires differ. We both enjoy some moral indiscretions.
Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam 34

Washington State University-2010

We share a common set of moral virtues


Obstacles Preventing
Its a gray world (cant tell right from wrong) We dont want to change Values change according to the circumstances We have different backgrounds Our desires differ We both enjoy some moral indiscretions

Intermediate Objectives
We agree on common virtues

We are willing to work on this


We agree on a common virtues We really know each other We share a set of common goals We live our set of virtues in all cases

Washington State University-2010

Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam 35

Sequencing the solution (Structure of the PRT)


Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam

We share a common set of moral virtues

We enjoy our indiscretions

Its hard to tell right from wrong

We live our set of virtues in all cases Our desires differ

We agree on a common virtues We are different

We share a set of common goals We dont know each other

We really know each other

We really communicate We dont We dont want to talk much admit error We subordinate We recognize our ourselves to each other own frailties Washington State University-2010

36

Putting the Intermediate Objectives Into Place

The PreRequisite Tree exposed the Intermediate


Objectives (Milestones) needed for How to Cause the Change? But, How to We actually Get there? How will, We Really Communicate? For this, the Transition Tree gives the Step-by-Step Approach to getting there.
We really communicate We dont We dont want to talk much admit error We subordinate We recognize our ourselves to each other own frailties
Washington State University-2010 37

Working Upwards on a Transition Tree


Spouses can be a significant help and support for dealing with problems We recognize (more and more of) our own frailties <feed back loop from up above> We, each, admit (confidentially) to some of our problems that we wish to eliminate

We generally know about each others mistakes that we try to hide

We want to improve

There are (and should be) few secrets between spouses


We dont talk much We really communicate

We, each of us, try to hide our mistakes Mistakes are inevitable We are mortal

We recognize our own frailties

other Washington State University-2010

We want others to We subordinate ourselves to each respect us

We dont want to admit error

People rarely respect people who make a lot of mistakes


38

Working Upwards on a We subordinate Transition Tree ourselves (more and


more) to each other We need cooperation (give and and take) from both sides Real love comes from sacrificing self for the benefit of others. It is easier to love when loved. We want to improve

<feed back loop from up above> We, each, accept we will do more things for each other than we are currently doing

We are willing to do some things that show love to our spouse


We dont talk much We We really communicate

We need to resolve some problems on both sides

Mistakes are inevitable

Loved each other We recognize our in the past own frailties

Our marriage has some strife caused by each of us. We dont We desire to want love each other to admit error even more than we do now We both have made some We subordinate mistakes ourselves to each other
Washington State University-2010 39

Working Upwards on a Transition Tree


We are very patient and listen without judgment. Neither of us dominates the discussion (for too long) We really communicate (more and more) <feed back loop from up above> We subordinate ourselves (more and more) to each other

We talk frequently about our successes together

We talk frequently about our challenges

We need to talk more

We each mention three good things that are happening in our lives
We dont want to admit error

We dedicate time to spend with each other


We each mention three problems that we want to improve. We both have topics of interest to each other
40

We dont talk much

We really communicate

We want our We recognize own frailties to improve

We recognize We subordinate more and more) of our We dont talkourselves much to each other own frailties

Washington State University-2010

Working Upwards on a Transition Tree


We really communicate (more and more)

We each mention three good things that are happening in our lives

We each mention three problems that we want to improve.

We, each, admit (confidentially) to some of our problems that we wish to eliminate

We are very patient and listen without judgment.

We dont talk much We recognize our own frailties

We really communicate

We dont want to admit error


We subordinate ourselves to each other Washington State University-2010

We dedicate time to spend with each other

41

The Strategic/Tactic Plan for Marriage


S. Marital Bliss T. Love Each Other S. Get Along T. Accept Each Other S. Focus on the Other T. Have Common Goals Communication Forgiveness S. Trust Each Other T. Share Moral Code Fidelity S. Spouse Loves Me

T. Take Actions to cause Spouse to love me

Shared Responsibility
Washington State University-2010

Work at Marriage
42

The Evaporating Cloud

B. My Need
A. The Goal

D. What I Want

C. Others Need

D. What the Others Want

Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam


Washington State University-2010

43

Creating the Evaporating Cloud


1. What is it that I Want (that Im having trouble getting)?

D. What I Want

Washington State University-2010

44

Creating the Evaporating Cloud


1. What is it that I Want (that Im having trouble getting)?

D. What I Want

D. What the Others Want


2. What is it that the Others Want (that I dont want them to have)?
Washington State University-2010 45

Creating the Evaporating Cloud


3. Why do I want what I want? What Need am I trying to fulfill? 1. What is it that I Want (that Im having trouble getting)?

B. My Need

D. What I Want

D. What the Others Want


2. What is it that the Others Want (that I dont want them to have)?
Washington State University-2010 46

Creating the Evaporating Cloud


3. Why do I want what I want? What Need am I trying to fulfill? 1. What is it that I Want (that Im having trouble getting)?

B. My Need

D. What I Want

C. Others Need
4. Why do the Others want what they want? What Need do they have?

D. What the Others Want


2. What is it that the Others Want (that I dont want them to have)?
47

Washington State University-2010

Creating the Evaporating Cloud


3. Why do I want what I want? What Need am I trying to fulfill? 5. What Goal do we mutually share? Why are we still arguing? 1. What is it that I Want (that Im having trouble getting)?

B. My Need

D. What I Want

A. The Goal

Reading the Cloud: In order to <point> I must have <tail>.

C. Others Need

D. What the Others Want


2. What is it that the Others Want (that I dont want them to have)?
48

4. Why do the Others want what they want? What Need do they have?

Washington State University-2010

Communicating the Evaporating Cloud


4. Point out that you also have a significant Need. 1. Start the Mutual Goal. It is common ground. Both interested. 5. And you WANT to meet your Need as well.

B. My Need

D. What I Want

A. The Goal

Reading the Cloud: In order to <point> I must have <tail>.

C. Others Need

D. What the Others Want


3. Acknowledge the Other side Wants to act on meeting their Need. 49

2. Recognize you understand the Others Need must be meet to reach the Goal.

Washington State University-2010

Lets Do Some Examples

B. Why I Want It

D. What I Want (to do)

A. The Goal C. Why the Other Side Wants What They Want

D. What the Other Side Wants

Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

50

Lets Do Some Examples


STUDENT EXAMPLE

A. Get the Customer order

B. Make the offer attractive to the customer

D. Supplier makes the mold

C. Insure the quality of the product

D. Customer makes the Mold

Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

51

Lets Do Some Examples


STUDENT EXAMPLE

Because: Money is the ONLY motivator B. Motivate better Performance

Because: Motivated employees deliver more profit

D. Pay High Salaries Because: This will create conflict with the team. Salaries are fixed. D. Dont pay High Salaries

A. Make more Profit C. Control Expenses

Because: Expenses subtract from profit

Because: Salaries are a significant part of Thinking Process elements included expenses
in the Fundamentals Exam
Washington State University-2010 52

Evaporating the Evaporating Cloud


Assumption: All machines must be keep busy all the time. Assumption: We are measured upon our Production Level

B. Produce a Lot

D. Increase the Work-InProcess Assumption:


We cant increase WIP and Decrease WIP at the same time.

A. Manage Production Effectively

Assumption: Our profits are not high. Customers demand on-time delivery.

C. Keep Costs and Delivery in Control

D. Decrease the Work-InProcess

Assumption: WIP is expensive. High WIP delays flow time.


Washington State University-2010 53

There is an Injection for Every Conflict

Arrow AB AC BD CD D/D

Assumption Productive Cost Effective Busy Machines Expensive WIP Cant do Both

Injection Deliver Max Capacity Price on Value Keep Constraint 100% Throughput Focus Buffer Constraint only

Chosen Injection: Focus on the Capacity Constrained Resource. Release work to the system at the rate of the Capacity Constrained Resource a Buffer Time in Advance (no sooner, no later). Use Buffer Management to improve the system.
Washington State University-2010 54

Sometimes TOC Solutions Are Counter Intuitive

DBR: To get more out, put less in. CCPM: To finish project sooner, delay the Start. CCPM: To be safer, remove the safety. Replenishment: To get your products quicker to
the customer, store them farther away. To Solve the Conflict, Ignore the conflict. To Make More Money, Sell at below Cost.
If you cant find an injection, then just do what is opposite of what everyone else is doing (and then do whatever it takes to make it work).
Washington State University-2010 55

Negative Branch Reservation Practice


Story Line.
Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam

I just had an exposure to the Negative Branch Reservation Tool of the TOC Thinking Process. I can remember parts of it (the Good Side, the Bad Side part sticks out). The class instructor now tells us to make a Negative Branch Reservations as an in class quiz. Assignment. Draw the Negative Branch Reservation and the results of the trimming Injection.
Washington State University-2010 56

Negative Branch Reservation


The Good Side The Bad Side

I draw a NBR Tree


Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

57

I Wont be alone

Negative Branch Reservation


The Good Side
Two idiots are better than one I learn better how to do the NBR My NBR tree may not look good I Could look The Bad Side bad.

We might Miss it.

We might learn from Each other

I will look good!

Get Help from Each other

I might be called to present

Practice

I draw a NBR Tree


Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam

Im not too good at the NBR

Washington State University-2010

58

PreRequisite Tree Practice


The AMBITIOUS TARGET:
To Learn the Evaporating Cloud, the Negative Branch Reservation and PRT (Ambitious Target) Tree in the next half hour.
What are the Obstacles? What are the Injections?

Washington State University-2010

59

Learn EC, NBR, PRT in 30 Mins


Obstacles Preventing
.

Intermediate Objectives
.

Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam

Washington State University-2010

60

Learn EC, NBR, PRT in 30 Mins


Obstacles Preventing We are preoccupied.
We are sleepy (after lunch) Too many calls Details unknown to us Not enough time No writing materials Not willing to accept learning Not motivated. Difficult, complex, hard
Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam

Intermediate Objectives Full Time Call Concentration


Coffee Switch off (no distractions)

We Know the Details


Plenty of time Write on White Board We paid for this class! I really want to do this With the right materials, this is easy!
Washington State University-2010 61

Thinking Process elements included in the Fundamentals Exam

Sequencing the solution (Structure of the PRT)


. .

I learn the EC, NBR, PRT in 30 Mins

. . . . . . . .
Washington State University-2010 62

. . .

Categories of Legitimate Reservation Used to Scrutinize All Logic Trees


First: Second:
Clarity Entity Existence Causality The Effect The Cause

Third

Cause Insufficiency Additional Cause Cause Reversal Predicted Effect Tautology

This simple set of rules, which compiles all the key elements necessary and sufficient for anyone to validate or invalidate logic, is one of Eliyhau M. Goldratts significant contribution to thinking. Washington State University-2010

63

Resistance to Change
Why dont People Change?
Resistance to change is a good thing. It prevents most un-needed changes. People resist because they dont understand the value of the change and / or see significant negative branches without a way to deal with them. There are six basic layers of resistance and six methods to overcome them.

Washington State University-2010

64

Layers of Resistance
Layer 1. Disagree on the problem

Solution: Agree on the problem (CRT) Layer 2. Disagree on the direction of the solution Solution: Agree on the direction of the solution (EC) Layer 3. Disagree that the solution solves the problem. Solution: Agree that the solution solves the problem (FRT) Layer 4. Yes, But, there are potential Negative consequences. Solution: Agree that the solution will not lead to any significant negative effects (NBR) Layer 5. Yes. But, there are obstacles to implementing the solution. Solution: Agree on the way to overcome any obstacles that might block or distort implementation of the solution (PRT) Layer 6. Unverbalized fears Solution: Overcome Unverbalized fears (TT)
Washington State University-2010 65

Categories of Legitimate Reservation: CLR Clarity


Expressing logic visually gives the opportunity for scrutiny often missed when voiced only.

This is a pretty little girls school

This is a small school for girls

A School only for Pretty Girls? Or, is it a Pretty School for young girls? Or, just a very Little School? Could it be a school for one particularly Pretty Girl (you missed the apostrophe)? Are there boys there too? Does the building look particularly nice? What is the enrollment?

Washington State University-2010

66

CLR Entity Existence


A brand new Lexus costs $15,000 Operating costs of the car are of little concern The exterior appearance of the car doesnt matter

There is free maintenance for 100,000 miles Entity Existence Reservation: Do these things really exist in your world?
Washington State University-2010 67

CLR Causality
The Effect I receive 20% interest Causality: Show me how the parts in the Effect (at the point of the arrow) come from the Cause (from the tail). I need pants like Joes I need a car I become a millionaire

I open a Savings Account


The Cause

I want to be different

My roommate has a car

I buy stock

There are problems with each one.


Washington State University-2010 68

CLR Cause Insufficiency


Insufficiency Reservation: You Need to do your Project well. I get excellent grades in Class Insufficiency Reservation: Your Group needs to complete a good Group Project too.

I turn-in good homework

My Project goes well

My Group Project goes well


69

Washington State University-2010

CLR (More on Insufficiency)


Is it sufficient?

Not without the Triangle!

Washington State University-2010

70

CLR Additional Cause


Additional Cause Reservation: I dont get good Gas Mileage

Additional Cause Reservation:

I drive too fast My Truck is large I carry heavy loads Ah-Ha! We see an area were improvement is possible.
71

Washington State University-2010

CLR Cause Reversal


My Garage is full of stuff.
My Garage is too small. My Garage is too small.

The Garage didnt create all the extra things.

My Garage is full of stuff

I cant get my car in the Garage.

Washington State University-2010

72

CLR Predicted Effect


We dont have enough money to pay our bills
Others with the same income would not be able to pay their bills

The Most Difficult CLR to use (you have to think).

Predicted Effect Reservation: If our income is too low, I would expect to see most people with the same income unable to pay their bills. And yet, I see lots of people with the same or less income paying their bills just fine.

Our Income is too low

We have too many bills


Many others with same or less income do pay their bills

We buy too many things we really dont need


Discovery Happens!
73

Washington State University-2010

CLR-Tautology Reservation
A Too Tight a Logical Loop Too Tight a Logic Loop

Most Frequent Logical Error!

10. There is a Chicken

20. There is an Egg

A Longer Logical Loop Resolves the Age Old Question

11. A Male and Female Chicken can produce a fertile Egg

14. There is a Male Chicken

16. There is a Female Chicken

OR

20. There is a fertile Egg


74

But, maybe there were two eggs first! Washington State University-2010

CLR Tautology
The Cause is the Excuse
The Beavers lost the game The Beavers are a lousy team. The Effect The Cause

Most Frequent Logical Error!

The Circular Logic of the Cause is accepted because of the Effect.

How do you know the Beavers are a lousy Team? Because, they lost the game didnt they! Whenever you hear, a BECAUSE, that is the same as the Effect you have a Tautology (bad logic).
Washington State University-2010 75

CLR Tautology
The Cause is Hard to Define
The Beavers lost the game

Most Frequent Logical Error!

The Circular Logic of the Tautology comes from a Cause which is abstract; difficult to determine, define or quantify. The Beavers are So, too often the Cause is not a lousy team. challenged. And, it seems the undefined Cause is accepted because of the Effect. To resolve the Tautology, the Cause needs to be something that can be determined and challenged; Not an Abstract Concept. In this case, the abstract word is lousy. What does that mean? We need another substantial meaning. When the BECAUSE is ABSTRACT, we need to dig further. 76
Washington State University-2010

CLR Tautology: Searching For An Alternate Connection


The Beavers lost the game The Beavers may are a not lousy be so team. bad.
The Beavers play a lousy game

Most Frequent Logical Error!

The Beavers are depressed by their mistakes

The Beavers face an easy team


The Beavers are perceived as a lousy team.

People feel bad when they make dumb mistakes

The Beavers dont execute well

The Beavers dont prepare well for games


Washington State University-2010

The Beavers are in a slump


They are not thinking clearly
77

How Do Tautologies Happen?


They are obstinate I push them harder They still dont do it I push them

Most Frequent Logical Error! They are obstinate I push them hard

I tell them what to do

Cause for Tautology is unanswered questions. They dont Do we every stop to do it think why they are not answered? Why dont people do what they are told? 78 Hum? Washington State University-2010

Cause for the Tautology Pre-Conceived Notion


Conclusions is the Tautology!
He wont help us He is a jerk

Most Frequent Logical Error!

In General, the most common error in Jumping to


They are Muslims He is Black They are Poor Sometimes a Tautology is a single statement. Shes a Woman Men!

Hes Indian

Hum? What is the underlying reason for these crude remarks?


Washington State University-2010

They are Part of Management!

79

Tautology is often a Knee Jerk


When we hear, BECAUSE (same as Effect) When the BECAUSE is ABSTRACT When the ABSTRACT is DEROGITORY
It is probably a Tautology Logic Problem Basic Assumptions of the Theory of Constraints:
All People Think All People are Good Emotion is evidence of passionate, logical thinking!
Washington State University-2010 80

Every action is logical (within the environment and in accordance with the individuals understanding of their ability to change the environment)

Practice Correcting a Knee Jerk


They are Part of Management!

=>

Management is Incompetent
I dont get what I need I am not the systems problem

Management Ignores me Management Doesnt Respond Management Doesnt Listen

Why Should they?


Im important I do a good job Management must be dealing with some very serious needs Im glad its not me!

Managements Role is to oversee systemic performance


81

Washington State University-2010

An Additional TOC Insight


Systems are Inherently Simple

System A E=MC2

System B In free markets, economic stability is controlled by the Interest Rate.


Washington State University-2010 82

Look for a Simple Solution!


I cant do my homework I dont know what the words mean I dont understand the problems I dont understand the book Its too complicated Lecture doesnt make sense I cant see the connections There are too many concepts
Washington State University-2010 83

The homework is too hard


Did you ask anyone for clarity? No.

Thinking Processes
The Goal: Improve Systems (Remove UDEs) The Measure: Number, Scope and Severity of Problems The Constraint: Core Conflict UDE UDE UDE UDE UDE There once was an old System UDE That lived in a shoe. UDE That had so many UDEs UDE UDE UDE It didnt know what to do UDE UDE UDE UDE
Washington State University-2010

UDE UDE UDE UDE UDE


84

Thinking Processes
The Analysis: The Paradigm Shift: Cause the Erroneous Assumption to Go Away (Fix Rules, Measures) Let the System Behave Correctly!

Washington State University-2010

85

Thinking Process Results


Problems Go AwayAre Replaced By Desirable Entities! Conflicts can be Resolved. Negative Branches should be Trimmed. Be James Bond -- A Few, Rightly Placed Injections can Make Dramatic Improvement! We can achieve Ambitious Targets What do we learn here to apply to Daily Lives?

Communication is Greatly Improved!


Buy-In Happens!
Washington State University-2010 86

Thinking Processes Lessons Learned


There are Answers -- Dont Despair Look for Cause-->Effect Relationships Think Clearly

Dont Accept Compromise (No Win-Lose or


Lose-Lose)
Learn to find Breakthrough Injections A Cloud-A-Day keeps the Conflict Away Enter a Complex World, Find the One Spot that Needs Fixing, Fix it. Then, Look for the Next Spot to Fix Washington State University-2010

Clarity, Causality, Insufficiency, Additional Cause, Predicted Effect, Cause Reversal

Become Justifiably Self-Confident

87

Next Topics
TOC Thinking Processes TOC Applications
Operations Project Management Replenishment TOC Finances and Measures

Some TOC Philosophy will be blended into these


additional topics.

Washington State University-2010

88

You might also like