www.weatherderivs.com 2 Call/Put Hedging Diversification or Static hedging (portfolio oriented) PCA Markowitz SD Dynamic hedging (Index hedging) www.weatherderivs.com 3 Dynamic Hedging 1. Temperature Simulation process used
2. Swap hedging and cap effects
3. Greeks neutral hedging www.weatherderivs.com 4 1. Temperature Simulation process used www.weatherderivs.com 5 Temperature simulation GARCH ARFIMA FBM
ARFIMA-FIGARCH Bootstrapp Long Memory Homoskedasticity Short Memory Heteroskedasticity Heteroskedasticity & Long Memory Part 1 Temperature Simulation process used www.weatherderivs.com 6 ARFIMA-FIGARCH model i i i i i y m S T o + + = Seasonality Trend ARFIMA-FIGARCH Part 1 Temperature Simulation process used Seasonal volatility www.weatherderivs.com 7 ARFIMA-FIGARCH definition ( )( ) ( ) ( ) t t d L y L L c u | = 0 1 Where, as in the ARMA model, is the unconditional mean of y t while the autoregressive operator and the moving average operator are polynomials of order a and m, respectively, in the lag operator L, and the innovationsc t are white noises with the variance 2 . ( )
= = a j j j L L 1 1 | | We consider first the ARFIMA process: ( )
= + = m j j j L L 1 1 u u Part 1 Temperature Simulation process used www.weatherderivs.com 8 FIGARCH noise ( ) 1 O = t t t Var h c Part 1 Temperature Simulation process used Given the conditional variance
We suppose that ( ) | | ( ) ( )( ) 2 2 1 ] 1 [ 1 t d t t L L L h L c c | e | + = Cf Baillie, Bollerslev and Mikkelsen 96 or Chung 03 for full specification Long term memory www.weatherderivs.com 9 Distributions of London winter HDD Histo Sim Densities 2,400 2,200 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0 Histo Sim Average 1700.79 1704.54 St Dev 128.52 119.26 Skewness 0.42 -0.01 Kurtosis 3.63 3.13 Minimum 1474.39 1375.13 Maximum 2118.64 2118.92 With similar detrending methods
The slight differences come mainly from the year 1963 Part 1 Temperature Simulation process used www.weatherderivs.com 10 2. Swap hedging and cap effects www.weatherderivs.com 11 Swap Hedging Long HDD Call and oopt call HDD Swap Long HDD Put and oopt put HDD Swap Dynamic values Part 2 Swap hedging and cap effects www.weatherderivs.com 12 Deltas of a capped call Delta of Capped Calls cap 200 gfedcb cap 400 gfedcb cap 800 gfedcb Mean 2 100 2 000 1 900 1 800 1 700 1 600 1 500 1 400 1 300 Delta 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Vol 140 130 120 110 100 90 Part 2 Swap hedging and cap effects www.weatherderivs.com 13 Deltas of capped swaps Delta of Capped Swaps Delta Swap cap 200 gfedcb Delta of Swap cap 400 gfedcb Delta of Swap cap 800 gfedcb Strike 2 000 1 900 1 800 1 700 1 600 1 500 1 400 1 300 Delta 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Vol 140 130 120 110 100 90 Part 2 Swap hedging and cap effects www.weatherderivs.com 14 Call optimal delta hedge oopt call = o call / o swap Delta of Capped Call & Swap call cap 200 gfedcb swap cap 200 gfedcb Mean 2 100 2 000 1 900 1 800 1 700 1 600 1 500 1 400 1 300 Delta 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 NOT = 1 Prices of Capped Call & Swap swap cap 200 gfedcb call cap 200 gfedcb Mean 2 100 2 000 1 900 1 800 1 700 1 600 1 500 1 400 1 300 F a i r
V a l u e s 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 -150 Part 2 Swap hedging and cap effects www.weatherderivs.com 15 Put optimal delta hedge oopt put = o put / o swap NOT = 1 Delta of Capped Put & Swap swap cap 200 gfedcb put cap 200 gfedcb Mean 2 100 2 000 1 900 1 800 1 700 1 600 1 500 1 400 1 300 Delta 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 Prices of Capped Put & Swap swap cap 200 gfedcb put cap 200 gfedcb Mean 2 100 2 000 1 900 1 800 1 700 1 600 1 500 1 400 1 300 F a i r
V a l u e s 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 -150 Part 2 Swap hedging and cap effects www.weatherderivs.com 16
3. Greeks neutral hedging www.weatherderivs.com 17 Traded swap levels THE DATA USED IS MOST CERTAINLY INCOMPLETE
We would like to thank Spectron Group plc for providing the weather market swap data Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging www.weatherderivs.com 18 Historical swap levels LONDON HDD December London HDD December 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 05-Nov-02 10-Nov-02 15-Nov-02 20-Nov-02 25-Nov-02 30-Nov-02 05-Dec-02 10-Dec-02 15-Dec-02 Date H D D Mean Max Min Current Index Weather Index Cone - LONDON HDD December 2002 28/12/2002 21/12/2002 14/12/2002 07/12/2002 500 480 460 440 420 400 380 360 340 320 300 280 260 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Forward ~ 380 Before the period started: swap level below Then swap level above like the partial index Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging www.weatherderivs.com 19 Historical swap levels LONDON HDD January London HDD January 250 300 350 400 450 500 30-Dec-02 04-Jan-03 09-Jan-03 14-Jan-03 19-Jan-03 24-Jan-03 Date H D D Mean Max Min Current Index Weather Index Cone - LONDON HDD January 2003 31 29 27 25 23 21 19 17 15 13 11 09 07 05 03 01 580 560 540 520 500 480 460 440 420 400 380 360 340 320 300 280 260 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Forward ~ 400 Before the period started: swap level below Then swap level has 2 peaks and does not follow the partial index evolution which is well above the mean Part 3 Delta Vega Neutral Hedging www.weatherderivs.com 20 Historical swap levels LONDON HDD February Mean Max Min Current Index Weather Index Cone - LONDON HDD February 2003 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 08 06 04 02 500 480 460 440 420 400 380 360 340 320 300 280 260 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 London HDD February 250 270 290 310 330 350 370 390 04-Jan- 03 09-Jan- 03 14-Jan- 03 19-Jan- 03 24-Jan- 03 29-Jan- 03 03-Feb- 03 08-Feb- 03 13-Feb- 03 18-Feb- 03 23-Feb- 03 Date H D D Forward ~ 350 Before the start of the period, the swap level is well below the forward Then swap level converges toward with forward Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging www.weatherderivs.com 21 Historical swap levels LONDON HDD March Mean Max Min Current Index Weather Index Cone - LONDON HDD March 2003 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 08 06 04 02 440 420 400 380 360 340 320 300 280 260 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 London HDD March 282 284 286 288 290 292 294 296 298 300 302 30-Dec- 02 09-Jan- 03 19-Jan- 03 29-Jan- 03 08-Feb- 03 18-Feb- 03 28-Feb- 03 10-Mar- 03 20-Mar- 03 30-Mar- 03 Date H D D Forward ~ 340 Before the period started: swap level below the forward Then swap level converges toward final swap level Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging www.weatherderivs.com 22 Swap level Behaviour OF COURSE IT DEPENDS ON THE MODEL USED TO ESTIMATE THE FORWARD REFERENCE The swap seems to start to trade below its forward before the start of the period and remains quite constant prior the start of the period (or 10 days before) The swap level converges quickly to its final value (10 days in advance) There can be very erratic levels
Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging www.weatherderivs.com 23 Consequences on Option Hedging Before the start of the period when the swap level is below the forward (if it really is!) then the swap has a strong theta, a non zero gamma (if capped) and a delta away from 1 (if capped) The delta of the traded swap convergences towards 1 slowly 10 days before the end of the period, the delta is close to 1, the theta is close to zero, the gamma is close to zero The vega of the option will be close to zero 10 days before the end of the period Erratic swap levels must not be taken into account Before the start of the period, assuming the swap level is quite constant, it is easier to sell the option volatility than during the period During the period, the theta of the option will not offset the theta of the swap, nor will the gamma of the option offset the gamma of the swap
Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging www.weatherderivs.com 24 No neutral hedging Due to the cap on the swap and swap illiquidity the resulting position is likely to be non Delta neutral, non Gamma neutral, non Theta neutral and non Vega neutral If the swaps are kept (impossible to roll the swaps), the Gamma and Theta issues are likely to grow Solutions: Minimise function of Greeks Minimise function of payoffs (e.g. SD) Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging www.weatherderivs.com 25 Market Assumptions Bid/Ask spread of Swap is 1% of standard deviation (London Nov-Mar Stdev 100 => spread = 1 HDD). No market bias: (Bid + Ask) / 2 = Model Forward Option Bid/Ask spread is 20 % of StDev.
Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging www.weatherderivs.com 26 Trajectory example Forward trajectory - London HDD December 02 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 2 5 / 1 1 / 2 0 0 2 3 0 / 1 1 / 2 0 0 2 0 5 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 1 0 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 1 5 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 2 0 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 2 5 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 3 0 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 0 4 / 0 1 / 2 0 0 3 date H D D 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 S t D e v 1 2 3 4 1: decrease in vol (15%) implies a higher gamma and theta => rehedge
2: increase in vol => less sensitive to gamma and theta but forward down by 25% of vol => rehedge
3: forward down, vol still high and will go down quickly (near the end of the period) => rehedge
4: sharp decrease in vol and forward => rehedge Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging www.weatherderivs.com 27 Simulation results summary The smaller the caps on the swap the higher the frequency of adjustment must be and the higher is the hedging cost (transaction/market/back office cost). Alternately we can keep the swap to hedge extreme unidirectional events. For out of the money options, if the caps of the option are identical to the caps of the swap, then the hedging adjustment frequency is reduced (delta, gamma are close). The combination of swap illiquidity with caps creates a substantial bias in Greeks Hedging. The higher the caps the more efficient is the hedge. Optimising a portfolio using SD, Markowitz or PCA criterias is still a favoured solution for hedging but is inappropriate for option volatility traders. Part 3 Greeks Neutral Hedging www.weatherderivs.com 28 Conclusion With the success of CME contracts, other exchanges and new players may enter into the weather market. This may increase liquidity which will make dynamic hedging of portfolios more practical. New speculators such as volatility traders may be attracted. This may give the opportunity to offer more complex hedging tools that the primary market needs with lower risk premia. www.weatherderivs.com 29 References J.C. Augros, M. Moreno, Book Les drivs financiers et dassurance, Ed Economica, 2002. R. Baillie, T. Bollerslev, H.O. Mikkelsen, Fractionally integrated generalized autoregressive condition heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 1996, vol 74, pp 3-30. F.J. Breidt, N. Crato, P. de Lima, The detection and estimation of long memory in stochastic volatility, Journal of econometrics, 1998, vol 83, pp325-348 D.C. Brody, J. Syroka, M. Zervos, Dynamical pricing of weather derivatives, Quantitative Finance volume 2 (2002) pp 189-198, Institute of physics publishing R. Caballero, Stochastic modelling of daily temperature time series for use in weather derivative pricing, Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 2003. Ching-Fan Chung, Estimating the FIGARCH Model, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, 2003. M. Moreno, "Riding the Temp", published in FOW - special supplement for Weather Derivatives M. Moreno, O. Roustant, Temperature simulation process, Book La Rassurance, Ed Economica, Marsh 2003. Spectron Ltd for swap levels