You are on page 1of 74

Candidate

Selection

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Under-Balanced
Fluids
•Air (N2,
Gas)
•Mist
•Gaseated
•Foam
•Oil
•Water
•Mud
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Subjects Covered

• Candidate Selection
• Flow Drilling
• Aerated
• Foam
• Air/Gas/N2
• Completions

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Reasons for UB Drilling
1. Limit lost circulation
2. Improve drilling rate
3. Avoid differential
sticking
4. Protect reservoir

Other benefits are not reasons.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Results

Improve the rate of


return on investment.

(Broadened Scope)

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Candidate Selection
Historical Perspective

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Cable Tools

• The first
underbalanced
drillers.
• No skin damage.
• Great production.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


UB History

• 1938 - California Gas Drilling.


• 1948 - Aerated, Big Lake
Texas.
• 1960 - AEC Foam, Nuclear
Holes.
• 1965 - Aerated U.S.
• 1968 - Chevron Foam,
California.
• 1986 - Aerated Canada.
• 192? - Russia, Where? What?
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Underbalanced Drilling Areas
2000

Lost Circulation. Drilling Rate


Reservoir Protection
Geothermal

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Number of Underbalanced Wells
in Canada
1500
1600
Total Number of Wells

1400

1200

1000

800
525
600
330
400 230
120
200 30

0
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
Year
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
New Subject
Underbalance Fluids
Summary

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Drilling Fluid Densities
1.2
10.8
0
1.0 75
10.4
78 11.
1
4 83

Salt Water
Saturated
8.3 .4
62 12

s
Gel a
.

y & Water
90 6

d
6

Mu
6.9 Wa

nd W
52 ter
2.0

ted
Oi

eigh
t
oo

ater

Native Cla
cF

0.5

-W ted
in W

r
ate
ubi

Fo

CL ra
am Ae

Ca Satu

Po
er C

Beg
wi rate
4

und
th d M
ds P
23

Ba
ck ud

s per
Poun

Pr Weighted Mud
es
.4 Stable Foam su

Gallon
re (Barite)
2
15

Mist
Air
.02
.3

0.002 Types
Types of
Types ofDrilling
of Drilling
DrillingFluids
Fluids and
and Their
Fluids Relative
TheirTheir
and Relative Densities
Densities
Relative
2.3
Densities
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Categories of UB Drilling

• Air and gas


drilling.
Mist drilling.

• Foam drilling.
• Gaseated drilling.
• Flow drilling.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Gas Drilling

• First commercial UB
drilling was with
gas in the U.S.
(1940’s)

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Gas Drilling
Common Drilling Gases

• Air.
• Natural gas.
• Nitrogen.
• Engine exhaust
(Nitrogen).
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Gas Drilling,
Producing 3MM SCF/day

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Western Air Drilling, 1954

First Widespread use came with


development of portable air
compressors.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Advantages of Gas
Drilling

• Increase drilling rate.


• No lost circulation*
• No differential sticking.
• Minimal reservoir
damage.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Problems with Gas
Drilling
• Water.
• Washouts, especially in
coal.
• Corrosion.
• Downhole fires with air.
• Crooked hole.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Air/Mist Drilling
• Water & detergent is added
to air (or gas) when the
hole becomes damp or
when it is too washed out to
lift the cuttings.
• Water added is normally
between 5 bbl/hr to 10
bbl/hr (0.8 m3/hr to 1.5
m3/hr). Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Categories of UB Drilling

• Air and gas


drilling.
• Foam drilling.
• Gaseated
drilling.
• Flow drilling.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Foam Drilling

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


FOAM
Has the greatest
potential
of
any of the “Light”
fluids.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Advantages of Foam
Drilling
• Great lifting capacity.
• Controllable BHP.
• Increase drilling rate.
• No lost circulation*
• No differential sticking.
• Minimal reservoir
damage.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Problems with Foam
Drilling
• Complex mixture-Hard
to get a proper mixture
and maintain it
properly.
• Disposal/Storage.
• Cost.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Categories of UB Drilling

• Air and gas


drilling.
• Foam drilling.
• Gaseated drilling.
• Flow drilling.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Gaseated Drilling

• Gaseated or aerated
drilling uses a mixture of
fluid and gas.
• Gas may generally be any
gas.
• Fluid may be from oil to
water to drilling mud.
• No binding agent is used
(foamer).
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Gaseated Separator

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Advantages
of Gaseated Drilling

• Increase drilling rate.


• No lost circulation*
• No differential sticking.
• Minimal reservoir
damage.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Problems
with Gaseated Drilling

• Surging (causing
overpressures or
caving).
• Corrosion (not with
nitrogen).
• Hole caving.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Categories of UB Drilling

• Air and gas


drilling.
• Foam drilling.
• Gaseated drilling.
• Flow drilling.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Flow Drilling

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Flow Drilling

Conventional Mud Used in an


Underbalanced Condition

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Advantages of Flow
Drilling
• Uses regular mud
system.
• Least expensive way of
UB drilling.
• No lost returns.
• No differential sticking.
• Improved ROP.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Problems with Flow
Drilling
• Limited ability to reduce
annular pressure below
“normal” reservoir
pressures.
• Drilling with a constant
well flow or potential of
well flow.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
All Good Ideas

• All have problems.


• Nothing works all the
time.
• UB does not improve
production all of the time.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Candidate Selection

COMMENTS!!
Underbalanced Drilling
Benefits

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Underbalanced Drilling

• New processes involve


risk.
• Budget enough money.
• Don’t promise too much.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Have at Least One
Good Economic
Reason
or
Technical Reason

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Remember the Learning
Curve !!!!

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


UB Drilling
Applications

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


UB Drilling Applications
• Drilling.
• Lost returns.
• Drilling rate.
• Differential pressure
sticking.
• Limited water.
• Reservoir protection.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Lost Returns

• Reduce the mud


density.
• Don’t add junk.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Lost Circulation
Candidates
• Permeability > 1,000 md.
• Large fractures (>100
micron opening).
• Vugular porosity.
• Overbalanced > 1,000 psi
with conventional fluids.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Increased Drilling Rate
Effect of Differential
70 Pressure
7-7/8 TRICONE BIT
30,000 lbs. WOB
60
60 RPM
DRILLING RATE (ft/hr)

50

40
AUSTIN CHALK
p
30
b
MANCOS SHALE
20

10
COLTON SANDSTONE p
p
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000

DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE (psi)


Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Drilling Rate-UB
Effect of Differential
Pressure
Perfect
DRILLING RATE (ft/hr)

Cleaning

p
b
Bit
Flounder

p
p

-500 0 +500 +1000

DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE (psi)


Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Hard Rock & Crooked
Hole

• Air Hammer.
• Pendulum.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Differential Pressure
Sticking
DRILL PIPE
PH

FILTER CAKE

,K
Pf

PH > Pf

DRILL COLLAR

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Limited Water
Desert & Semi-Arid Regions
Algeria
South Yemen
Libya
SW United States

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


UB Drilling Applications
(2)

• Formation damage
avoidance.
 Skin damage.
 Fluid-fluid sensitivity.

 Fluid-formation sensitivity.

 Depleted zones.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Formation Damage

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Depleted Zones

• Slow drilling rate.


• Lost returns.
• Differential pressure
sticking.
• Reservoir damage.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Skin Damage

Reservoir Filter Cake


Core
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Skin Damage Due to
Filter Cake and Mud Solids
10 micron
Effective pore throat
External 10u 1-3 micron
Filtrate Seal solids

10 micron pore
Internal throat
Pluggin 1 micron &
g smaller solids

Ineffective 10 micron pore


External throat
Seal for 10 micron
Small solids & some
Fines & smaller solids
Filtrate
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Skin Damage
Avoidance Techniques

•UB Drilling
•Non-Invasive Mud Cake
•Ultra Clean Drill-in Fluid

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Fluid
Sensitivity
1. Fluid-Formation Reaction (Shale Instability)
Instability

2.

Fluid-Fluid Reaction
(Emulsions)
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Mechanism for Formation
Blocking
(Bennion, 1995)

Non
Wetting
Phase
Fines
Wetting
Phase
Case 1
Non-Wetting Non
phase in Wetting
motion- Phase
minimal fines
migration
Case 2
Wetting phase
in motion -
potential for fines Non
migration Wettin
g

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Formation
Damage - Fractured Formations
Fracture Plugging

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Mechanism for Formation
Blocking
(Bennion, 1995)
Fractured Formations
100 micron fracture
10 micron solids
High losses,
minimal damage

100 micron fracture


Sealed Fracture, depth 10-100 micron solids
of invasion dependent
on solids size
distribution and
overbalanced

100 micron fracture


Poor Seal, potential 10-500 micron solids
continued leak-off of
filtrate and small solids

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


UB Drilling in Fractured
Reservoirs

No Invasion of
“Top” Fractures
While Underbalanced

Produced Fluid
1 Drilling Fluid 2

Fluid Gravity
Balance Displacement
or Micro
Fracture

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Potential Formation Damage
Mechanism in Different Sand Reservoir
Types

Incompatibility

Incompatibility

Overbalanced
Effect of High
Adsorption

Biological
Migration
Trapping
Invasion

Chemical

Damage
Fluid-Fluid

Rock-Fluid

Solids

Phase

Fines
Damage
Mechanism
Homogenous
Sand-Clean
Homogenous
Sand-Dirty
Laminated
Sand-Clean
Laminated
Sand-Dirty
Unconsolidated
Sand
Fractured Sand
Perm-Matrix

Probable Possible
Unlikely Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Potential Formation Damage
Mechanism in Different Sand Reservoir
Types

Incompatibility

Incompatibility

Overbalanced
Effect of High
Adsorption
Fluid-Fluid

Rock-Fluid

Migration

Biological
Trapping
Invasion

Chemical

Damage
Solids

Phase

Fines
Damage
Mechanism

Fractured Sand
Low Perm Matrix
Homogenous
Carbonate
Fractured Carbonate
Impermeable Matrix
Fractured Carbonate
Permeable Matrix
Vugular
Carbonate

Probable Possible
Unlikely
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Candidate Selection

Underbalanced Drilling
Limitations

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


UB Limits
• UB is not an
enhancement technique.
• Mud column pressure is
not a seal against:
 Well kick.
 Broken or fractured
formation.
 Weak formations.

 Heaving shale.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Underbalanced
Problem
ROTATING BOPs
COMPRESSOR / N2
SOLID/LIQUID/GAS
COST
SEPARATION

CORROSION

HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS

VIBRATIONS
CUTTINGS LIFTING

FLUID INFLUX

FIRE/ UNDERBALANCED
EXPLOSION COMPLETION
HIGH TORQUE/ S
DRAG
BOREHOLE
STABILITY
MWD TRANSMISSION
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
If a reservoir will
not produce
without fracturing
it is probably a
poor UB prospect.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Warning

A poor prospect can


prove failure. You must
gamble with a well that
can succeed.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


The “Absolute” Rule for
UB Operations
…IT’S NOT WHAT YOU KNOW
THAT HURTS YOU.
…IT’S WHAT YOU KNOW THAT’S
NOT TRUE!

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


The No-Go Screen
If the following occurs within the
open hole section:

DON’T DRILL UNDERBALANCED

1. Geopressured shales
2. Steeply dipping fractured
formations
3. Thick broken coals
4. What about sands? - not
sandstone
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering
Primary Cause of Well
Bore Collapse

• NATURAL CAUSES
Fractured or Faulted Zones
High Pore Pressure
(Geopressure)
Weak, Low Strength Rocks
High in Situ Stresses

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Primary Causes of Well
Bore Collapse

 INDUCED
PROBLEMS
 Pressure Surges

 Wetted Shales

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


Compressive Failure
Models
Naturally fractured rock
Compressive
Yielding and
collapse
Friable Sandstone
Formation Breakdown
and Lost Circulation
Brittle Shales
Induced hydraulic
Salt fracture
Convergence
Wellbore
Swelling Shales Pressure

Natural or
Induced fractures

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


WELLSTAB - MEI Wellbore Stability Model
Mechanical/Chemical Stability Design
Multi-Depth Analysis
Microsoft Office Report

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering


END

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

You might also like