Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agenda
1. Definition
2. Shareholder Activists
3. Subjects of Shareholder Activism 4. Methods of Shareholder Activism
Definition
Shareholder activism refers to shareholders who claim their power as company owners in order to influence corporations behaviour
http://www.ecgi.org/activism/
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Individual investors
Corporate gadflies Other individual investors
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Determinants
When does the potential for shareholder optimism arise?
Managers make decisions in their own interests
Dissatisfaction of shareholders
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Agency Theory
Potential conflict of interests: Managers acting in their interests even at the expense of shareholders Asymmetry of knowledge Example: Executive compensation and privileges at the costs of shareholders Main concern of shareholders: to increase their value to achieve maximum investment returns According to the theory rational shareholder will become active only if the
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Exit Voice
Sell shares
Active Shareholder
Loyalty
Definition
Shareholder activists
No activities
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
http://proxymonitor.org/forms/pmr_02.aspx
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
gain legitimacy as business actors Types of activists: Pension funds, Social investment Funds Where: e.g. Energy sector- environmental issues
Meyer and Rowan (1977); DiMaggio and Powell (1983)
11
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Types of activists: Proxy advisory firms, even media organization could be added who report on the company
Carleton (1998) Norden, L. L. and Strand, T. (August 2011) Copland, James R., Feyman, Y. and OKeefe, M. (2012)
12
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Methods
File proxy proposals and vote at Annual General Meeting Engage in private negotiations with management
Sikavica K, Hillman A.
13
Definition
Shareholder
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Shareholder Proposals
14
Definition
Shareholder
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Shareholder Proposals
Shareholder proposals formal communication channel between shareholders and management document recommendation
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Definition
Shareholder
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Companies with active and engaged shareholders are more likely to be successful Active shareholders can improve corporate performance by better monitoring
Disruptive, opportunistic, misguided action by active shareholders who lack the skills and the experience and follow their own benefits and agenda Take the money and run
Karpoff, J. (2001)
17
Definition
Shareholder
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
18
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
and values
Definition
Shareholder activists
Gillan and Starks (1998) and (2000), Smith, Michael P. (1996), Karpoff, J. (2001)
21
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Case Study
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
What happend?
After the takeover plan became known, TCI increased their shareholdings step by step As TCI became owner of 5% of the share capital, it called for an extraordinary general meeting and for the election of new supervisory board
TCI started a huge riot against the takover deal and called other shareholder for its boycott
TCI, Atticus, Lone Pine and others accumulated a stake in the company of up to 30% They demanded to stop the takeover as it would not create shareholder value for the investors of Deutsche Brse Instead they called for the share buy-back program and the paying of a special dividend
The CEO and the president of the supervisory board had to leave the company Deutsche Brse initiated a large special dividend and share buyback program
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
24
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Case assessment
The case of Frankfurter Brse and LSE was the first significant
phenomenon of shareholder activism in Germany Important symbolic meaning for the power of shareholder Still very controversial due to . very aggressive strategy of activists
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Conclusion
Shareholder Activism remains a controversial topic High costs, requirements and regulations limit the chances to become an active shareholder Only large shareholder will obtain return that offsets the associated costs Shareholder proposals often fail due to their non-binding character Empirical evidence show a small impact of activism on the performance of the companies Information asymmetry may lead to lack of understanding and thereby to harmful activism Shareholder often dont have the needed knowledge or experience The most activists follow their own interest, and not the interest of the company 27 (short-term horizon)
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
Conclusion
HOWEVER, Shareholder activism helps to raise the awareness for critical topics Shareholder activism can be a useful control instrument
Definition
Shareholder activists
Motivation
Methods
Effects
Case study
Conclusion
29
References
Books:
1. Huszar, Markus L.; (2007); Rebellion der Kapitalanleger: Der Investorenaktivismus in Theorie und praktischer Anwendung; Hamburg, Diplomica Verlag GmbH 2. Thomsen, S. & Conyon, M.; (2012); Corporate Governance: Mechanisms and Systems ; London : McGraw Hill.
Internet sources: 1. http://www.academia.edu/1426552/Changing_the_world_through_shareholder_activis m 2. http://www.ecgi.org/ 3. http://www.goingpublic.de/transparenz-fordert-aktionarsaktivismus/ 4. http://theshareholderactivist.com/tools-for-shareholder-activists/what-is-a-shareholderactivist-2 5. http://www.osler.com/newsresources/Details.aspx?id=3650 6. http://www.ehow.co.uk/about_6729036_agency-theory-corporate-governance.html
30
Papers: 1. Strand, T. (2012) The Owners and the Power:Insights from Annual General Meetings; PhD Thesis. Centre for Corporate Governance, Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School. 2. Yale, R.R.; Less is More: Making Shareholder Activism a Valuable Mechanism of Corporate Governance; CeRP Working Paper Series N 12/01; Law School and National Bureau of Economic Research 3. Smith, Michael P. (1996) Shareholder Activism by Institutional Investors: Evidence from CalPERS; The Journal of Finance, Vol. 51, No. 1 , pp. 227-252. 4. Gillan, Stuart L. & Starks, Laura T. (2000) "Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: the role of institutional investors; Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 57, pp. 275-305 5. Karpoff, Jonathan M. (10/09/ 2001) The Impact of Shareholder Activism on Target Companies: A Survey of Empirical Findings; For presentation at the Corporate Governance and Praxis: International Seminar 6. Van der Elst, C. (July 2011) Revisiting Shareholder Activism at AGMs: Voting Determinants of Large and Small Shareholders; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) Finance Working Paper No. 311/2011 and Tilburg Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 019/2011 7. Levit, D.and Malenko, N. (October 2011) Nonbinding Voting for Shareholder Proposals ; Journal of Finance, October 2011; Rock Center for Corporate Governance Working Paper No. 37. 8. Gillan, Stuart L. and Starks, Laura T. (1998) A Survey of Shareholder Activism: Motivation and Empirical Evidence 9. Hendry, J., Sanderson,P., Barker, R., Roberts, J. (December 2004) Respoonsible ownership, shareholder value and the new shareholder activism; ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge Working Paper No. 297, 10. Copland, James R., Feyman, Y. and OKeefe, M. (2012) PROXY MONITOR. A Report on Corporate Governance and Shareholder Activism; Centre for legal policy at the Manhattan Institute 11. Renneboog, L., Szilagyi, Peter G. (March 2010) Shareholder Activism through the Proxy Process; ECGI Finance Working Paper N. 275/2010 12. Yafeh, Y. and Hamdani, A. (October 10, 2011). Institutional Investors as Minority Shareholders 13. Van der Elst, C. (March 7, 2012) Shareholder Rights and Shareholder Activism: The Role of the General Meeting of Shareholders; ECGI - Law Working Paper No. 188/2012. 14. Norden, Lars L. and Strand, Therese (August 2011) Shareholder Activism among Portfolio Managers: Rational Decisions or 15 Minutes of Fame? , Journal of Management & Governance; Volume 15, Issue 3, pp. 375-391 31 15.Sikavica, K., Hillman, A. (2008) Towards a Behavioral Theory of Corporate Ownership and Shareholder Activism; Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings
References