Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ZOO 4903 Fall 2006, MW 10:30-11:45 Sutton Hall, Room 312 Jonathan Wren
Systems Biology
Lecture overview
What weve talked about so far
Pathways & network motifs Simulating evolution in-silico Cellular simulations
Overview
The ultimate goal of biology & bioinformatics is to tie it all together and understand the system In the meantime, forced to live in the real world, we focus on tying a few things together
http://www.systemsbiology.org/
Proteomics
Modelling Tools
9
65-69
70-74
75-79
80-84
85-89
90-94
95-99
Period
BIOSSIM (1968) ESSYN (1976) SCAMP (1983) SCOP (1986) METAMOD (1986) SIMFIT (1990) METAMODEL (1991) METASIM (1992) KINSIM (1993) GEPASI (1994) METALGEN (1994 ?) MIST (1995) METABOLIKA (1997 ?) METAFLUX (1997) SIMFLUX (1997) MNA (1998) CELLMOD (1998) FLUXMAP (1999) METATOOL (1999) VCELL (1999)
Pi Calculus
Petri Nets
Differential Eqs
Boolean Networks
Cellular Automata
Atomic Scale 0.1 - 1.0 nm Coordinate data Dynamic data 0.1 - 10 ns Molecular dynamics
Tissue Scale 0.01m - 1.0 m Metabolic input Metabolic output 1 s 1 hr Process flow
Ecosystem scale 1 km 1000 km Environmental impact Nutrient flow 1 yr 1000 yrs Network Dynamics
System Models
Building computational models of systems seems more and more like a viable project.
Such a project would bring a much clearer understanding of how systems are controlled and ultimately it should bring unprecedented predictive power.
Xo
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
X1
What happens to the steady state? Xo and X1 fixed, all reactions reversible, assume stable steady state.
Xo
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
X1
Xo
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
X1
http://bms-mudshark.brookes.ac.uk/frances/fabweb5.htm
29 species
http://bms-mudshark.brookes.ac.uk/frances/fabweb5.htm
29 species
27 components
As more data is integrated and systems linked together, this becomes easier
Example of inference
(a) An interaction network of SnzSno proteins of S. cerevisiae. The nodes represent proteins and the lines represent yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) interactions. The red nodes represent proteins that correspond to genes in one transcriptome cluster, whereas the green nodes represent proteins that correspond to genes belonging to a different cluster. The existence of two stable complexes can be hypothesized based on the integrated data. (b) The genes NTH1 and YLR270W have similar expression profiles (upper panel). Red indicates upregulation and green indicates downregulation. mRNA expressions of both genes are upregulated during heat shock and other forms of stress. Deletions of NTH1 and YLR270W each confer similar heat-shock sensitive phenotypes (lower panel).
Problems?
How is static data interpreted since its a dynamic system?
How do we deal with low-resolution quality?
So where do we start?
Quantitative analysis of components and dynamics of complex biological systems
Static (Tier 1)
Deterministic (Tier 2)
Stochastic (Tier 3)
Response
New protein may remain in cell after initial response, shifting the rate of reaction the next time the cell is exposed to a chemical
Chemical concentration
So where do we start?
Quantitatively account for these properties
Different levels of modeling
Static (Tier 1)
Three tiers
Static interactions Deterministic Stochastic
Deterministic (Tier 2)
Stochastic (Tier 3)
Principle 1: Modularity
Module
Interacting nodes w/ common function Constrained pleiotropy Feedback loops, oscillators, amplifiers
Principle 3: Robustness
Robustness
Insensitivity to parameter variation
Tier 2: Deterministic
What is the average case behavior?
Tier 3: Stochastic
What is the variance of the system?
Stochastic
Stochastic update equations
Molecule numbers as random variables functions of time
Y = # molecules at time t
Protein-DNA
Gene regulation
Metabolic pathways
Respiration cAMP
typical interactome
Global features
starting point for Tier 2 & 3
first time-varying yeast interactome (Bork 2005)
Graph Theory
scale free small world
Three levels
ODE system ODE compartment system PDE data limited
cell compartments
Output
time series plots (ODE) condition on parameter values Brandman 2005
Exact adaptation
change in concentration of chemical stimulant rapid change in bacterial tumbling frequency then adapts back precisely to its prestimulus value!!
Random walk
Experimental Design
Is exact adaptation robust to substantial variations in biochemical parameters? Systematically varied concentrations of chemotaxis-network proteins and measured resulting behavior
Adaption time
Adaptation precision = ratio of steady-state tumbling frequency of unstimulated to stimulated cells Summary of results Tumbling frequency 0.3 0.06 (20-fold) Adaption time 3 1 (3-fold) Adaption precision 1.04 0.07
Fast kinetics
reaction time negligible
Slow kinetics
relative to movement time
Translational bursting
Low mRNA copy number
N = average molecular abundance (coefficient of variation) = /N Decrease in abundance results ina 1/N scaling of the noise (=1/N)
Recap
Three tiers
Interactomes Deterministic Stochastic Static (Tier 1)
Stochastic (Tier 3)
Important
parameter estimation feedback based estimation methods
Sachs 2005
Software
Tier 1: Interactomes
Graphviz, Bioconductor, Cytoscape
Tier 2: Deterministic
Matlab (SBtoolbox), Mathematica (PathwayLab)
Tier 3: Stochastic
R, Stochsim
Software
High-performance algorithms to solve systems of PDEs
Virtual Cell
Summary
Systems Biology can be done by breaking down each system into modules Many problems remain unsolved in exactly how to do this, but independent efforts are being developed in most areas that may one day merge together