Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agenda
Introduction Problem Definition
Oracle Project Costing Data and Accounting flow Existing Process for Projects Reconciliation
Case Study
Background Solution Benefits
Q&A
Disclaimer
This presentation contains general information only and is based on the experiences and research of Deloitte practitioners. Deloitte is not, by means of this presentation, rendering business, financial, investment, or other professional advice or services. This presentation is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte, its affiliates, and related entities shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this presentation.
Introduction
Problem Definition
The key issues company faces with the reconciliation of Oracle Project Costing with Oracle General Ledger are: Multiple reports are used for reconciliation with limited visibility of all type of costs in Oracle Project Costing. Non-availability of a standard report, which can provide visibility of the costs directly booked in General Ledger therefore losing the visibility of Project details. Non-availability of a standard report, which can provide the accounting information of the Project costs directly booked in Oracle Project Costing when comparing it with the costs booked in General Ledger. Non-availability of a standard report , which could convert details of all the Project costs in the accounting format for comparison and reconciliation purpose.
Purchasing
General Ledger
Inventory/OPM
Payables
Fixed Assets
Project Costing
General Ledger
Manual JE in GL
Steps for reconciliation Execute AUD: Project Subledger report. Execute Account Analysis report in General Ledger. Download both reports and reconcile each accounting combination.
Case Study
Background
Client is a leading biopharmaceutical company from the Life Sciences Industry. Client was using out-of-the-box solution to track costs using Oracle Project Costing.
o All cost centers related to R&D department uses Projects for tracking their 100% of the cost through Oracle Project Costing
Client was using Oracle Project Costing for tracking actual allocations from different cost centers (performed in GL) and depreciation of the fixed assets purchased for the departments.
11
Solution.Reporting Needs
Projects
Project Expenditure Type Expenditure Organization Location Amount Projects Source
General Ledger
Natural Account Cost Center Location Amount General Ledger Source
12
Solution.Reporting Needs
Created three layouts for providing reconciliation information: Layout1 Summary layout to provide executive level summary at the cost center level. Created following detailed layouts to provide:
o o Layout2 Detail information without Project Code for Accountants. Layout3 Detail information with Project Codes for Project Controllers and Project Accountants.
13
Solution.Layout1
Summary Layout (Layout1) has following key features:
The report output fulfills the requirement of presenting all related costs for the cost centers flowing to General Ledger from Project Costing. The report output has two sections: Projects and General Ledger. Each section provides summarized cost comparison between Project Costing and General Ledger at the cost center level. The summary layout is convenient for the users at the executive level.
14
Solution.Layout2
Detail Layout (Layout2) has following key features:
The report output fulfills the requirement of presenting all related costs for the cost centers with additional details (e.g. Source, Expenditure Type, etc.) The report output has two sections: Projects and General Ledger The report compares the Expenditure Type in Projects with Accounts in GL. The report compares the Expenditure Organization in Projects with Cost center in GL.
15
Solution.Layout3
Detail Layout (Layout3) has following key features:
The report output fulfills the requirement of presenting all related costs for the cost centers by Project Number. Project Number is shown in the report to further drilldown on Projects. The layout helps in identifying the reconciliation differences at the Project Code level.
16
Benefits
The custom reconciliation process helps to reduce time and effort during period close. This solution presents the information in user-friendly layout therefore allowing for easy navigation. Single source of truth review all costs and transactions related to Oracle Project Costing and compare to General Ledger without running multiple reports. The reports can run at Cost Center, Natural Account, and Source level which allows flexibility for data comparison. Compares the information at the accounts level with the Project Code therefore meeting needs for cross-functional users in the organization (Executive, Project Manager, Project Controller and Accountants)
17
Questions
Contact Information: Sachin Singh Sr. Consultant, Deloitte Consulting LLP sachsingh@deloitte.com 650-576-4826
As used in this presentation, Deloitte means Deloitte Consulting LLP, a subsidiary of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitt e.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries
18
19