Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Graduated from an Angle course given by George Hahn in 1928 Tweed diagnosed & treated cases under Angles guidance He held to Angles firm conviction that one must never extract for 3 yrs. High frequency of relapse discouraging Important observation1) facial balance & post treatment success related to upright mandibular incisors 2) to get lower incisors upright, one must prepare anchorage & extract teeth
Dr. Tweed
His technique can be summarized as an anchorage technique. While most operators were concentrating on how best to move teeth, he focused himself on how not to move teeth. To a great extent cart has been placed before the horse, Dr.Tweed placed the horse where it belongs, in front of the cart. Angle gave orthodontics the edgewise bracket, but Tweed gave the specialty the appliance
Among his other contributions:a) Emphasized the four objectives of orthodontic treatment with emphasis & concern for facial esthetics b) Developed the concept of uprighting teeth over basal bone esp. lower incisors
e) Developed the diagnostic facial triangle to make cephalometrics a diagnostic tool & a guide in treatment & evaluation of results f) He developed the concepts of orderly treatment procedures & introduced anchorage preparation as a major step in treatment
g) He developed a fundamentally sound & consistent pre orthodontic guidance program using & popularizing serial extraction of primary & permanent teeth
Over the years several modifications have taken place in the appliance, however the concepts remain the same. Basic concepts which are cornerstones of modern edgewise orthodontics:1)Ability to obtain tooth movement in all 3 planes of space with a single archwire 2)The philosophy of treating to an ideal arch or to Angles concept of Line of Occlusion The line with which, in form and position according to type,the teeth must be in harmony if in normal occlusion 3)The use of rectangular or square edgewise arches which if properly employed can control arch width, arch form, B-L crown inclinations, axial root inclinations & incisor crownroot torque
Tweeds philosophy
Based on the following :a)
Practically all malocclusions are characterized by a forward adjustment of teeth in relation to their basal bones --- this is due to deficiency between the basal bone & tooth material The establishment & maintenance of a stable anchorage should be the initial concern of the operator & is a fundamental factor in successful orthodontic treatment Teeth like inanimate objects, best resist the force of displacement when tipped to the angulation that offers the most advantageous mechanics against the pull of dislodging forces, they are best stabilized when they overlie the basal bone
b)
c)
d)Teeth are most readily moved when their property & power of mechanical resistance has been primarily reduced
e) All forces emanating from an orthodontic appliance must be synchronized if they are to be most effective in the mass stabilization or the mass movement of teeth f) Nature being an expert mechanic herself, offers biologic compensations & adjustments when teeth are placed in position of mechanical advantage for force resistance g) The dental units will best resist forward displacement when the buccal teeth are in mild distal axial position & the incisor teeth are in mild lingual axial inclination & overlying a substantial bony foundation placing the incisors on the ridge
Every malocclusion exemplifies a denture that is stabilized by balanced muscular forces & this muscular balance must be preserved in treatment if stability in the end result is to be accomplished ( Strang & Thompson )
Facial types
Tweed divided the facial types into following types:TYPE A :-Maxilla & mandible show forward & downward growth -ANB angle remains the same -Prognosis is good -Treatment not indicated during mixed dentition if ANB angle does not exceed 4.5 TYPE A Subdivision:-ANB angle greater than 4.5
TYBE B :- Maxilla & mandible grow downward & forward with maxilla growing more rapidly than mandible - When ANB angle is 4.5 or less prognosis is favorable - Extraoral appliances should be used immediately after extraction TYBE B Subdivision :-ANB is large & found to be increasing -Undesirable growth trend, treatment long & difficult
TYPE C :- -Maxilla & mandible grow downward & forward with mandible growing more than maxilla -ANB decreasing -Growth is favourable & treatment is facilitated by growth TYPE C Subdivision :-mandible grows more than maxilla but only to a little extent
IMPA 90 86.93 76 99
FMIA 65 68.20 56 80
For successful treatment triangle should be attainable Aim should be to obtain:FMIA of 70 75 ( when FMA = 20 ) FMIA of 65 ( when FMA = 30) When FMA is less than 20 FMIA should be more than 70 & IMPA should not exceed 94 He showed that in well balanced faces IMPA was 905 For every degree that FMA was in excess of 25 .the incisor mandibular angle IMPA would have to be decreased by 1
Based on the requirements of diagnostic facial triangle Consists of constructing the triangle on a tracing of the patients lateral ceph and measuring the 3 angles. According to the FMA measured the required IMPA and FMIA are then constructed on the tracing, involving relocating the axial inclinations of the mandibbular incisors. This new hypothetical position is considered and the change in arch length is calculated, which is the cephalogram correction This is added to the arch length discrepancy measured on the cast to give us the total discrepancy.
Tweed summarized his philosophy on which his appliance therapy is based:i) Normal occlusion is best maintained with the mandibular incisors in their normal axial inclination when related to the F-H plane approx. 65(FMIA) ii) The ultimate in balance & harmony of facial esthetics is achieved only when the mandibular incisors are positioned over the basal bone iii) The normal relationship of the mandibular incisors to their basal bone is the most reliable guide in diagnosis & treatment of cl. I ,cl. II & bimaxillary protrusion cases and also in attainment of balance & harmony of facial profile & permanence of tooth position
Treatment objectives :-
Facial balance & harmony Stability of the post treatment dentition Healthy oral tissues Efficient mastication
Anchorage preparation
Stable anchorage important to prevent forward movement
of mandibular denture when cl.II intermaxillary force is applied On histological basis Brodie (1937) believes that the strongest anchorage is provided by stable fixation of teeth to allow as little movement as possible Tweed anchor teeth best resist the dislodging forces when their vertical axes are parallel to the direction which offers the most advantageous mechanical resistance against the pull of dislodging forces
Strongest anchorage is provided by tipping back the crowns of the teeth so that they will have a disto-axial inclination that will resist a forward pull therefore, first & most important step in treatment - Anchorage preparation
If anchorage preparation is not done the action of intermaxillary elastics causes -elevation of terminal molars & depression of mandibular incisors -canting of occlusal plane, -increase in FMA, -point B drops downward & backward, -entire mandibular denture is tipped & displaced forward into protrusion
Second degree -for malocclusions with ANB more than 0 to 4 -facial esthetics requires to move point B anteriorly & point A posteriorly i,e cl. II cases -usually accompanied by type A, type A subdiv.,type B & type B subdiv. -degree of distal tipping of mandibular molars more severe than first degree anch.prep. they should be tipped so that their distal marginal ridges are at gum level
Third degree -severe discrepancy cases 14-20mm or more -ANB does not exceed 5 -generally cl.I bimaxillary cases -sliding jigs are necessary -2nd ,1st molars & 2nd premolar must be tipped to such an extent that the distal marginal ridges are below the gum level also called total anchorage preparation
Unique alignment of upper lateral incisor thinner labiolingually & short crown length
Contact points lie on an ellipsoid curve There is a straight line from canine to mesio buccal cusp of first molar, but beyond that it curves inward progressively
Second order bends -represent a vertical change -also called tip/angulation -used to tip posterior teeth mesially or distally-may be tip back or tip forward bends
Lingual torque
Labial torque
Incorporation of torque
Anchorage preparation
1) placing mandibular incisors upright 2) changing axial inclinations of the maxillary incisors, to make them less resistant to distal movement 3) changing the axial inclinations of buccal teeth to a more distal axial inclination
.021 X .027 stabilization wire with mild second order bends in upper arch .019 X .026 in working wire in lower arch with tip back bends & sliding jigs to bear pressure on 2nd premolar bracket cl. III elastics are worn Once anchorage preparation in lower arch done reverse the mechanics cl. II elastics are worn
Incisor retraction
Using .019 X .026 archwire with closed Bull loop distal to canine activated 1mm every 3 wks. Mandibular incisors are retracted to an FMIA of 65 in cl.I cases & 70 in cl.II cases
Maxillary incisor retraction completed with heavier .021 X .027 in. wire, reduced posterior to lateral incisors & passed free of canine Strong lingual root torque in upper wire for bodily retraction
to facilitate retraction, stops are soldered 3mm mesial to 2nd premolar brackets Coil springs compressed against the stops and tied to the entire posterior segment
Completion procedure
Final space closure & detailed tooth positioning -.019 X .026 in. max. & mand. ideal arches, coil springs compressed mesial to 2nd molar tubes until space closure is completed
In case of a deepening of bite a biteplate is used along with box elastics to increase the vertical opening to the desired level. Biteplate is retained for 3-4 months to allow for osseous develpoment.
Preparation of anchorage in the lower arch Preparation of anchorage in the upper arch Distal enmasse movement of maxillary arch Detailed positioning of teeth
Anchorage Preparation
Anchorage preparation in mandibular arch
Initial leveling & alignment - .016 or .018 round wires
Working arch wire .019 X .026 in. with coordinated tip back bends cl. III intermaxillary hooks soldered mesial to canine Loop stops are made mesial to molar tubes but the archwire not tied to molar anchor teeth
Upper arch is stabilized -.021 X .027 in.wire with mild tip back bends Intermediate pull headgear mesial to canine is used to augment the anchorage - min. 14 hrs./day Distal pull by headgear twice as much as mesial pull on the arch by cl. III elastics During day light cl. III During night heavy cl. III Distal tip back bends increased slightly every 2-3 wks.
Steps in treatment :
Anchorage preparation in lower arch Anchorage preparation in upper arch Extraction of four premolars Multiple loops .016 in. archwire U/L used for alignment Space closure done using looped archwire
Steps in treatment Initial .016 in. round wires After 2 wks. ,.021X .027 in. U/L ideal arches Brass wire hooks mesial to canine Mandibular archwire is bent considerably narrower than the ideal & torque is placed in the buccal segment Step forward 2nd order bends placed in maxillary posterior segment (direct opp. of tip back bends) Intermaxillary elastics from lingual of maxillary molar to hook mesial to mandibular canine When cross bite is corrected archwires are reshaped to the ideal Treatment continued until the maxillary teeth have moved forward enmasse into occlusion with teeth in mandibular arch.