PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN THERMAL POWER PLANT- NTPCs EXPERIENCE

By

ATANU DUTTA
National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd.
1

CAPACITY ADDITION

A. EXISTING CAPACITY : B. ONGOING PROJECTS : C.IDENTIFIED FOR 11 &12

TH TH

32194 MW 17930 MW PLAN: 41531 MW

CONTINUED
2

CAPACITY ADDITION
As on 13/10/09

B.
SR NO

ONGOING PROJECTS :
PROJECT NAME

17930 MW
PROPOSED CAPACITY IN MW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Sipat-I Barh-I Koldam (Hydro) Simhadri-II Korba-III Barh II Farakka-III

1980 1980 800 1000 500 1320 500

CONTINUED
3

CAPACITY ADDITION
SR NO PROJECT NAME CAPACITY IN MW

Loharinagpala (Hydro)

600

9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Tapovan Vishnugad (Hydro)

Vallur-JV with TNEB (Ph-I & II) Indira Gandhi Thermal Power Station, Jhajjar Bongaigaon Nabinagar Railway JV Mauda Rihand-III Vindhyachal-IV

520
1500 1500 750 1000 1000 1000 1000

CAPACITY ADDITION
C. NEW PROJECTS FOR 11th & 12th PLAN: 41531 MW
SR NO 1 2 3 4 PROJECT NAME
Muzaffarpur Expansion KAWAS-II JHANOR-II

PROPOSED CAPACITY IN MW
390 1300 1300

Nabinagar-II -JV BSEB

Meja UP -JV UP
Mouda-II Solapur

1980
1320
1320 1320

5
6 7 8

North Karanpura

1980

9
10 11

Rupsiabagar Khasiyabara (Hydro)

Non conventional power project Rammam-III (Hydro)

260
1000 120

12

Lata Tapovan (Hydro)

171
CONTINUED 5

CAPACITY ADDITION
NEW PROJECTS - 11th & 12th PLAN
SR NO PROJECT NAME
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Kudgi Ph-I&II Lara (C.G) Singrauli-III Vindhyachal-V Gadarwara (MP) Bargad (UP)

PROPOSED CAPACITY IN MW
4000 4000 500 500 2640 4000

Tanda-II
Darlipalli-I Unchahar-IV Nuclear Power Project RAJEEV GANDHI CCPP-II

1320
3200 500 2000 1950

Marakkanam-Ph I &II (TN) Kolodyne (Mizoram)

4000 460
6

Power Sector Reforms

ROADBLOCKS IN POWER SECTOR DEVELOPMENT

Low Plant Load Factor (PLF) Inadequate investments in R&M High T&D losses Inadequate T&D network Non-optimal Hydro-Thermal mix Poor Financial health of SEBs Funds Constraints Other infrastructure inadequacies (Railways, Ports etc.)

Project Management of Multi Projects by one Organisation requires different handling than the Project Management of only one Project .

In multi projects, Systems Approach in Project Management is essential.

Integrated Project Management

and
Control System (IPMCS)
10

Salient Features of NTPCs Project Management

Global Competitive Bidding. Transparent Procurement System.

Detailed Engineering after Order.

Computer Based Integrated Management System. Project

11

 PROJECT CONCEPTUALISATION PROJECT PROPOSAL, APPRAISAL

The Phases of NTPC Project

PROJECT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PACKAGING ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT MANUFACTURE & DELIVERY PROJECT EXECUTION CIVIL CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION COMMISSIONING PERFORMANCE TESTING EVALUATION AND CLOSING

12

NTPC PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Proper Timely

Scrutiny of the Project- Techno Economy Identification and placement of Project Leader

Timely

Identification and Placement of Good Project Team

of Land Boundary Financial Tie up including internal resources with Govt Agencies- a proactive approach Rehabilitation & Resettlement Policy Project Planning, Scheduling & Monitoring.

Demarcation Sound

Liaison

Comprehensive Effective

I T & Communication Infrastructure

Performance Budgeting System

Engineering Competence
Contd.. 13

contd

Established and Transparent Procurement Procedures Vendor Assessment

Employee Training & Education

Incorporating Learning from past experience Healthy Industrial Relations

Comprehensive Project Incentive Scheme

Comprehensive Quality Assurance Single Point Project Implementation Responsibility

- Project Manager

Adequate Delegation at Various Levels Empowered Project Review Team(PRT)

14

IPMCS
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION COMPRISES OF :

Pre order network for each projects Master network (L1) Procurement of materials and tendering Contracts - includes the following :

Packaging concept for effective and faster implementation Qualification to ensure competition from competent parties Pre defined evaluation criteria Contractor selection by Techno-Commercial considerations L2 network for each contract/package Post award execution and expediting

Engineering and quality assurance system L3 programme for site activities

15

INTEGRATION OF 3 TIER PLANNING, REVIEW AND CONTROL SYSTEM

Pre Order Net Work L-1 Tier Planning L-1 Project MNW Contract L2 Network (Manf. & Dely) Contract L2 Network (Site Act.) Contract L-3 Program (Site Act.) Weekly Review by HOD Site Proj. Review Top Management Reviews Monthly Exception Report

L-2 Tier Planning

Engg. L2 SCH.

L-3 Tier Planning

Engg. L-3 Program Fortnightly Reviews GM / HOD

Contract L-3 Program (Manf. & Dely) Weekly Reviews GM / HOD

C.R.M.

L-3 Tier Review L-2 Tier Review L-1 Tier Review

T.C.M.

Monthly Project Review (PRT)

16

PRE ORDER NETWORK

I : Preparation of Comprehensive feasibility report and various statutory clearances and Investment Approval II : Infrastructural development

III : Tendering of major packages

17

Pre-Order Network

18

PRE ORDER NETWORK

I : Preparation of feasibility report and various statutory & mandatory clearances and Investment Approval

Project identification & appropriate site selection Pre- feasibility studies including environmental impact assessment Statutory clearance (central & State) Project design memorandum Mode of Funding & tie-up Fuel linkage ATS tie up Initiation of Land Acquisition Proceeding Techno- Economic Clearance Power purchase agreement Appraisal by independent financial institution Investment Approval
19

II : Infrastructure development

Infrastructural development covers the activities at site such as following :

Survey & soil investigation Land acquisition and R&R plan Posting of project manager and nucleus site organisation Site levelling Boundary wall, Gate & fencing Approach road, plant roads and drains

Tie up of cement and steel

Construction power and water Construction offices, storage sheds Transit camp/Guest house Communication facilities

20

III :Tendering of major packages

Review of Packaging Contracting for timely implementation of the Project. Major Packages are:

Steam Generator Turbine generator

Water System Coal handling plant

Civil & Structural Steel works

Transformers & Switchgear

Switchyard
Station C&I
21

 L1 (MASTER NETWORK- MNW)

MNW in form of PERT Network is Prepared.

Master Network identifies the milestones for key events for each package in the areas of engineering, procurement, manufacturing, despatch, erection and commissioning.
Interrelationship between various activities is clearly identified in the master network.

22

L1 Master Network Simhadri TPP

23

 L2 NETWORK
L-2 NetWork gives the Schedule for Starting/Completion of Activities

L2 network is the contractual documents indicating the time frame from start to completion of package within the frame-work of master network (L1). L2 network is prepared by the contractor and finalised by Corporate Monitoring Group in association with Engineering , Contract Services, Quality Assurance, Inspection and site. It includes shop manufactured items/ materials and bought out items. Adequate cash flow tie up specifically with PSU/Contractor.

24

L2 Network - Civil Work Simhadri TPP

25

 L3 PROGRAMME

L3 programme is a three monthly rolling programme prepared by site within the time frame of L2 schedule indicating various items and quantity to be executed in each month. Resources and all other inputs to execute these quantities are clearly mentioned. From the three monthly programming, a monthly/fortnightly/weekly execution programme is prepared indicating next months/fortnights programme / quantity, drawings, materials, fronts and resources availability etc.
26

THREE CONTROL CENTRES :

ENGINEERING

MANAGEMENT

CONTRACTING,

INSPECTION &

EXPEDITING
SITE

MANAGEMENT

27

1. ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT

Preparation of comprehensive list of Engineering Activities Scheduling of engineering activities at L2 level within the time frame of master network (MNW)

Scheduling of Drawings/Data submission by contractor and approval

Releasing timely construction drawings to site

ISO 9001 Compliant

28

QUALIFYING REQUIREMENT :

IN NTPC QRs are finalised before freezing final specifications of packages for tendering. QRs are made so that Contractors with sound Techno-Commercial capabilities only participate against NTPC tendering and Contract is awarded to sound and capable Contractors. A data bank of sound and capable Contractors are prepared and maintained for reference of future contracts. The QRs are reviewed by standing committee consisting of D(Proj), Engineering and Contracts representatives so as to take care of Technological and Market Development.

29

2. CONTRACTS MANAGEMENT

Contract Packaging :

Initial Projects-65-70 pkgs. Subsequent Projects-55-60 pkgs. Current Projects:14-30 pkgs.

Tendering and Ordering Follow up for timely delivery

ISO 9002 Compliant

30

MDCC ( Material Despatch and Clearance Certificate)

NTPC specifies Customer Hold Points, with regard to different manufacturing stages, in the approved QP based on which inspections are carried out by NTPC at every Customer Hold Points and CHP clearance are issued. MDCC is issued to ensure that materials as per approved QP are manufactured & despatched. L/C is negotiated by the Banker/Contractor only on presentation of MDCC in original I addition to other relevant documents.

31

3. SITE MANAGEMENT

Development of L3 Programme Execution of site activities as per programme

Ensuring desired quality in site activities Performance budgeting for site activities Local field engineering Weekly progress review of each package by concerned in-charge. Fortnightly project review by GM / Head of Project.

4. TOP MANAGEMENT REVIEW

32

Deviation at Site in Layout / Engg. Issues

Situation arises because of fouling of piping with structures, or fouling of structures with equipment, or when some specified are not available. For expeditious project activities, appropriate deviations are made at Site and this are regularised by proposals sent by Site to Corp. Engg. for according technical approval. In case of Site routed piping where no layout drawings are used by Corp. Engg., Site will workout the layout and send it to Corp. Engg. after getting the approval of GM(Projects).

33

Contingency Arrangement

Cost-benefit analysis is done before adopting any contingency plan. Contingency arrangements are made to ensure major milestone dates do not slip because of non-availability of certain inputs. To ensure availability of critical fronts for achieving major milestones following contingency arrangements were made for Vindhyachal Stage-II:

Interconnection of Stage-I & Stage-II DM Plant to ensure water for Boiler Hydro test of Unit-7. Interconnection of Stage-I PT Plant to Stage-II DM Plant to ensure adequate DM water for Unit-7 Boiler Commissioning.

34

COMMISSIONING ORGANISATION In order to streamline the planning & Management of Commissioning activities at NTPCs Projects; Commissioning Organisation is set up with the following three bodies:
Commissioning
Working

Panel

Parties

Commissioning

Steering Committee

35

COMMISSIONING Steering Committee

The Commissioning Steering Committee is the governing body responsible for formulating the overall policy for the safe and efficient Commissioning of the plant.It is the apex body for taking all crucial decisions and overcoming any constraints relating to plant completion and commissioning. Members of Commissioning Steering Committee are :

General Manager (Project)- Chairman Manager (OS) Manager (P.E.)

General General

AGM (Project) AGM(O&M) Representative (Project Manager Level) of Main

36

Contractors Packages.

COMMISSIONING PANEL
The main functions of Commissioning Panel are to prepare commissioning network, approval of all documentation and associated procedures, monitoring of commissioning activities, to compare and accept test results, to prepare periodic exception reports, to form documentation control centre for controlling the flow of documents etc. Members of Commissioning Panel are :

AGM (P) /AGM(O&M) ( Commn./Elect./Mech./C&I) Group Leaders

DGM

Erection

37

WORKING PARTIES Working Parties are formed to deal with each section of the plant or in some cases the related sections of the plant whose commissioning will be inter-dependent.The individual working parties will be required to undertake the responsibility of preparation of entire commg. Documentation. During commissioning the individual working team will see that all checks and tests are thoroughly carried out and completed.
Members of Working Parties are :

Leaders O&M Groups(Turbine/Boiler/Eect./C&I/Offsite/Chemistry) Erection Groups Package-wise

38

Leader

Contractor

REVIEW & CONTROL SYSTEM

Site Review Meetings

Weekly Review by concerned Package Engineer at site with Contractors. Critical & Major Pckgs. by HOD. Fortnightly Review of project by Head of Project/GM.

(Contd...) 39

CONTD..

Project Review Team (PRT)

PRT for each project comprising executives from three Control Centres, viz. Engineering, Contracts & Site. Also has members from service functions.

Project Review Team meetings take place every month chaired by the Head of the project/ GM. Detailed agenda issued in advance.
(Contd...) 40

Contd..

PRT Meeting ensures :

Resolve inter control centre problems

Identifying constraints & hold ups for present and future

Taking corrective action on various critical items.

Corporate Monitoring Group,

Issues MOM of PRT Meetings

identifies critical and major issues. Puts up exception report to top management.

(Contd...) 41

TECHNICAL CO-ORDINATION MEETINGS (TCM)

Technical Coordination Meetings take place with vendors to discuss on various engineering requirements, finalisation of engineering details within the time frame and schedules of engineering activities. TCM is convened by Engineering Control Centre.

Frequency of TCM is minimum once in a month. In initial stages of project frequency is high (2 to 4) depending on the requirement.

42

Contract Review Meetings(CRM)

Contract Review Meetings are convened by Contract Services with the vendors

Reviews progress of manufacturing & despatch

Resolves various contractural issues for expediting supplies.

Progress of manufacturing is reviewed w.r.t. L-2 Network.

CRM are generally held at manufacturing works to ascertain the status of the manufacturing. CRM is held atleast once in a month for major packages.
43

Management Reviews
Regional Executive Director reviews the Critical Packages and the progress of Project . Director (Project) reviews the progress of the project as per requirement. Other functional Directors also review project progress from time to time during their visit to site.

44

Contd..

CMDs review of the project as per requirement. Project Review in Management Committee , which are held once in a quarter.

45

Management Information System (MIS)

A From Site

Package wise weekly review at site:

P&S Dept at site generates report and puts up to Head of Project/GM.

Fortnightly Project Review at Site by HOP/ GMAction plan by P&S.

Monthly Progress Report from Site:

P&S compiles progress- actual vis--vis targets.This is a detailed Quantified progress report. This also indicates rolling programme for next 3 months
Contd..

46

Contd..

B Vendors Monthly Progress Report:

Each vendor submits monthly progress report. The report is in pre-decided formats. It covers all areas such as Engg., Ordering, Manfg., Quality & Despatch. It is sent to CMG, Site, Engg. & Contracts.

Contd..

47

Contd..

Minutes & Exception of Monthly PRT Meeting: CMG circulates MOM to all control centres for actions. Based on PRT meeting, Site progress report & CRM, CMG prepares every month exception report highlighting critical issues requiring immediate attention of Management.

Contd..

48

Contd..

Monthly Progress Report from Contract Services: Report on pre-award activities is prepared by CS. Monthly Report from Regional EDs : Report from
Regional Executive Director for CMD covering all aspects viz Operation, Projects, Commercial etc .

Minutes of Management Committee Meetings & Top Management Review : Action plan based on these reviews are prepared.

49

A comparison chart of milestones of few best achieved 1 st 500 MW units of NTPC

Ramagundam
Milestone Date Month from MP order 0 Date

Korba
Month from MP order 0 Date

Singrauli
Month from MP order 0 Date

VSTPP
Month from MP order 0

Main plant order

Jul-83

Aug-82

Jan-82

Mar-95

Boiler erection start

Drum lifting HT BLU TG erection start TG Boxup Synch.

Mar-85
May-86 Jun-87 Dec-87 Dec-86 Aug-87 Jun-88

20
34 47 53 41 49 59

Feb-84
Feb-85 Feb-86 Oct-86 Oct-85 Mar-87 May-87

18
30 42 50 38 55 57

Aug-83
Oct-84 Nov-85 May-86 Feb-85 Aug-86 Dec-86

19
33 46 52 37 55 59

Feb-96
Nov-96 Dec-97 Nov-98 Jul-97 Nov-98 Mar-99

11
20 33 44 28 44 48

50

Commissioning of 1st unit(500MW) from Main Plant Order(MPO)

Sl. No
1 2 3 4 5 6. 7.

Projects
Singrauli Korba Ramagundam Rihand Vindhyachal Simhadri Talcher

Date of Commn.

Duration from MPO(Months)

Dec86 May87

59

57
59 66

Jun88
Mar88 Mar99 Mar02 Jan03

48
39 38
51

REDUCING PROJECT COMPLETION TIME

RSTPP-III-2004

37

TALCHER-II-2003

TIME IN MONTHS FORM MAIN PLANT AWARD TO SYN FOR 500 MW UNIT

38

SIMHADRI-2002

39

VINDHYACHAL-1999

48

SINGRAULI-1986

59

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

52

REDUCING PROJECT COMPLETION TIME

VINDHYACHAL-9-2006 44.13

RAMAGUNDAM-7-2004

42.97

TIME IN MONTHS FROM MAIN PLANT AWARD TO COD FOR 500 MW UNIT

SIMHADRI-1-2002

45.3

RAMAGUNDAM-4-1988

63.17

KORBA-4-1987

66.17

SINGRAULI-6-1986

65.43

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

53

Integrated Project Management and Control System has significantly contributed in NTPCs Capacity Addition

NTPCs Installed Capacity as on date: 34194 MW

54

INTERNATIONAL ACCOLADES FOR NTPC

MARKETLINE INTERNATIONAL, UK, Ranks NTPC as Sixth Largest Thermal Power Generator globally & Most Efficient based on 1997 performance data, amongst them. ASIA WEEK ranks NTPC as 344th amongst top 1000 companies of ASIA in terms of sales revenue, second in terms of return on assets & fifth in terms absolute profit amongst all Asian Electric Utilities
55

INTERNATIONAL ACCOLADES

WORLD BANK Performance audit Report : 1993 :NTPCs record in plant construction cost containment and operating efficiency has been exceptional, while as an institution it has broken new ground in organisation and management successfully navigated the transition from construction to operating company and generally coped quite well with the problems of rapid expansion Draft Performance Audit Report : 1998 : The decision to support an efficient national power generation institution has greatly improved the efficiency of power generation in India and has, as a result, greatly improved the availability of power to the country as a whole. NTPC has grown into a highly efficient power company

56

CONCLUSION
NTPC has adopted dynamic approach and is in the process of tying up all related issues towards achieving its ambitious plan of becoming 50,000 MW plus company by 2012.

57

THANKS

58