Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Formation
Cement
Casing
Next Step
Study mechanism of mud cake deposition and erosion with the goal of developing better means for improved removal
Objectives
Build an experimental setup to study the mechanism of mud deposition and removal Develop a mathematical model Recommend procedures for field operations
Experimental Procedure
Day 1:
Water calibration in turbulent flow Mud calibration: 2, 4 BPM - No filtrate collected Mud circulation: 1 BPM, 1hr Filtrate collected Mud circulation: 3 and 5 BPM Filtrate collected Shutdown, 18 hrs, 100 psi differential
10
11
Later:
Model cut in sections Observations made Pictures taken
Beirute Consulting, L.L.C. 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Important Conclusions
Rate (wall shear stress) is needed to remove the PDG Extremely high rates can be detrimental to the PDG removal process The older the PDG, the harder it is to remove it
25
Proposed Mechanism
Opposing Forces:
Differential pressure against permeability causes the deposition of filter cake and PDG Erosion by flowing fluid tends to remove the PDG
PDG drilling fluid and filter cake are eroded as long as pressure drop (wall stress) in the annulus exceeds a certain value Shear stress at the wall: hydrodynamic force responsible for the erosion Adhesion forces: resistance to erosion
Beirute Consulting, L.L.C. 26
27
Can the stress of the PDG be inferred from normally reported mud properties?
Beirute Consulting, L.L.C. 28
Conversion Factor
Wall Shear Stress and Friction Pressure relationship: = De x P/4L Wall Stress (lb/100 ft2) = 300 x De (in) x P (psi)/(4 x L (ft)) P (psi) = Wall Stress (lb/100 ft2) x L (ft)/ (300 x De (in))
Beirute Consulting, L.L.C. 29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Lab Work
Since stress levels of the PDG need to be measured in the lab to be able to design jobs to effectively erode the PDG. Then: Develop and test erodibility cell Test erodibility of muds Design rates and spacer properties to erode PDG and filter cake
Beirute Consulting, L.L.C. 36
37
38
39
40
41