Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Modeling
Melting and Solidification Boiling and Condensation
Evaporation
Aerosol Jet Impingement
Abhat, A., Low temperature latent heat thermal energy storage: heat energy storage materials, Solar Energy, 30 (1983) 313-332.
Condensation
Steam radiators Orange growers spray oranges with iced water Snowy days are warmer than clear days in the winter
Density (kg/m3)
Steel Copper
1400 1086
247 206
7800 8900
Freezing Deposition
Ice
Sodium Sulfate
0 32
335 252
917 1495
Evaporation/Boiling
Sweat Alcohol is cool Melting ice in drinks Cooling with dry ice
Melting
Sublimation
Solid-Liquid
Temperature control Ablation
Coating
Liquid-Vapor
Evaporative cooling
Thermal Inertia and Thermal protection Passive heating and cooling Thermoelectric Refrigeration
Industrial Forming (casting, laser drilling) Food and Pharmaceutical Processing Telecom Shelters Human-comfort footwear and clothes Thermos and coolers
Electrical Generation
Microencapsulated PCMs
6
Thermodynamic Criteria
A melting point at the desired operating temperature A high latent heat of fusion per unit mass
A high density
A high specific heat A high thermal conductivity
Congruent melting
Small density differences between phases Little supercooling during freezing
7
Chemical Criteria
Chemical stability Non-corrosive, non-flammable, non-toxic
Others
Availability of small number of materials in the temperature range of interest Useful life Maintenance Stability Water loss
10
Organic Compounds
Paraffins Fatty Acids
Salt-Based Compounds
Salt Hydrates
Eutectics Others
Ice and water
Zeolite
11
Advantages
A wide range of melting points Non-toxic, non-corrosive Chemically stable Compatible with most building materials High latent heat per unit mass Melting congruity Negligible supercooling Are available for wide range of temperatures
Disadvantages
Expensive Low density Low thermal conductivity (compared to inorganic compounds) Large coefficient of thermal expansion Flammable Do not have a well-defined melting temperatures.
12
13
14
Advantages
Lower cost High latent heat per unit mass and volume High thermal conductivity Wide range of melting points (7-117oC)
Disadvantages
High rate of water loss Corrosive Phase separation Substantial Subcooling Phase segregation (lack of thermal stability)
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Cooling (5-15oC) Temper diurnal swings Heat pumps Solar hot-water heating systems Absorption air conditioner
22
Wall Roof
Window
Velraj, R. , and Pasupathy, A., PHASE CHANGE MATERIAL BASED THERMAL STORAGE FOR ENERGY CONSERVATION IN BUILDING ARCHITECTURE Institute for Energy Studies, CEG, Anna University, Chennai - 600 025. INDIA.
23
24
25
26
27
Condensation
Film Condensation Dropwise Condensation
28
29
One-region
Multiple-region
Two-region
30
31
32
Solid
Scale analysis
Liquid
B.C
33
Boundary Conditions
Solution:
34
35
36
37
38
1.
2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Determine the initial enthalpy at every node hjo (j = 1) Calculate the enthalpy after the first time step at nodes (j = 2 ,..., N -1) by using equation (1). Determine the temperature after the first time step at node (j = 1 ,..., N) by using equations (2) and (3). Find a control volume in which the enthalpy falls between 0 and hsl , and determine the location of the solid-liquid interface by using equation (4). Solve the phase-change problem at the next time step with the same procedure.
39
Unconditionally stable but is more complex because two unknown variables enthalpy and temperature are involved.
[See Alexiades , A ., and Solomon , A . D ., 1993 , Mathematical Modeling of Melting and Freezing Processes , Hemisphere , Washington , DC .]
Transform the energy equation into a nonlinear equation with a single variable h.
[See Cao , Y ., and Faghri , A ., 1989 , " A Numerical Analysis of Stefan Problem of Generalized MultiDimensional Phase-Change Structures Using the Enthalpy Transforming Model ," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer , Vol . 32 , pp . 1289-1298.]
40
Heat capacity during the phase change is infinite. Assume Cp and k change linearly from liquid to solid
Advantage: Simplicity Disadvantage: Unstable if right choices for x, t, and T are not made.
41
Combination of the two methods [Cao , Y ., and Faghri , A ., 1990a , " A Numerical Analysis of
Phase Change Problem including Natural Convection ," ASME Journal of Heat Transfer, Vol . 112 , pp . 812815.]
Assumptions
Enthalpy Method approach is considered Newtonian incompressible fluid with constant
properties, except the density that is evaluated s linear function of temperature (Bousinessq approximation) Effective conductivity in the mushy zone Isotropic Heat transfer by conduction, convection and phase change
CARLOS HERNN SALINAS LIRA1, SOLIDIFICATION IN SQUARE SECTION, Theoria, Vol. 10: 47-56, 2001.
43
44
45
Eulerian Averaging
Averaged over space, time, or both within the domain of integration
Based on time-space description of physical phenomena Consistent with the c.v. analysis used to develop governing equations. Eulerian time-averaging Eulerian volume-averaging
Phase-averages:
Intrinsic phase average Extrinsic phase average
Lagrangian Averaging
Follow a particle and average its properties during the flight
independent variable.
46
Governing Equations:
Jany , P ., and Bejan , 1988 , " Scaling Theory of Melting with Natural Convection in an Enclosure ," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer , Vol . 31 , pp . 1221-1235.
47
48
49
Nucleation
Homogeneous
50
51
Liquid and gas properties Latent heat of vaporization, Dhlg Surface tension at the interface, s Phase density difference, (rl - rg) Surface roughness and orientation Contact angle, c
52
Applications include
Self-decontaminating surfaces Antifogging surfaces Microfluidic chips Harvesting dews as drinkable water Pocket-sized chemical testing devices
53
Nano-structured film made of alternating layers of positively and negatively charged polymers and silica nanoparticles Dual quality material can be patterned to repel water in some areas (spherical droplets) and attract it in others (flattened ones).
54
55
Nucleate Boiling
Film Boiling
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
66
67
Macroscale (jet flow) Microscale (droplet dynamics) Impact of single droplet Impact of multiple droplets
Garbero, et al., Gas/surface heat transfer in spray deposition processes, Intl. J. Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 27, Issue 1, Feb 2006, pp. 105-122 68
Multiple jets:
69
Single Droplet
Droplet Spray
70
71
72
73
Correlation number jet/nozzle diameter droplet diameter droplet splashing criterion number of droplets number flux of droplets Nu Nusselt number, hD/k Nu0 Nusselt number in absence of particles mass loading surface tension
B D d K n
74
75
76
Before impact
After impact
77
Garbero, Vanni, and Fritscling, Gas/surface heat transfer in spray deposition processes, Intl J. Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 27, Issue 1. Feb 2006, pp. 105-122.
We < 80
We > 80
Where,
Cwb = 1/3
Park, K., and Watkins, A. P., Comparison of wall spray impaction models with experimental data on drop velocities and sizes , Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 17, No. 4, August 1996.
79
Spreading velocity
Film thickness
81
Finned tubes [1] A. Abhat, S. Aboul-Enein, N. Malatidis, Heat of fusion storage systems for solar heating applications, in: C. Den Quden (Ed.), Thermal Storage of Solar Energy, Martinus Nijhoff, 1981. [2] V.H. Morcos, Investigation of a latent heat thermal energy storage system, Solar Wind Technol. 7 (2/3) (1990) 197202. [3] M. Costa, D. Buddhi, A. Oliva, Numerical Simulation of a latent heat thermal energy storage system with enhanced heat conduction, Energy Convers. Mgmt. 39 (3/4) (1998) 319330. [4] P.V. Padmanabhan, M.V. Krishna Murthy, Outward phase change in a cylindrical annulus with axial fins on the inner tube, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 29 (1986) 18551868. [5] R. Velraj, R.V. Seeniraj, B. Hafner, C. Faber, K. Schwarzer, Experimental analysis and numerical modelling of inward solidification on a finned vertical tube for a latent heat storage unit, Solar Energy 60 (1997) 281 290. [6] R. Velraj, R.V. Seeniraj, B. Hafner, C. Faber, K. Schwarzer, Heat transfer enhancement in a latent heat storage system, Solar Energy 65 (1999) 171180. Embedding in Graphite Matrices [7] P. Satzger, B. Exka, F. Ziegler, Matrix-heat-exchanger for a latent-heat cold-storage, Proceedings of Megastock 98, Sapporo (Japan), 1998. [8] H. Mehling, S. Hiebler, F. Ziegler, Latent heat storage using a PCM-graphite composite material: advantages and potential applications, Proceedings of the 4th Workshop of IEA ECES IA Annex 10, Bendiktbeuern (Germany), 1999. [9] X. Py, R. Olives, S. Mauran, Paraffin/porous-graphite-matrix composite as a high and constant power thermal storage material, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 44 (2001) 27272737.
82