You are on page 1of 26

ANOVA: Full Factorial

Prepared By: 106 Pranav Jain 167 Surbhi Koshal 151 Aayush Agarwal 506 Harsh Gupta

Terminology
Response variable Measured output value
Factors Input variables that can be changed Levels/Treatments Specific values of factors (inputs) Replication Completely re-run experiment with same input levels Used to determine impact of measurement error

Interaction Effect of one input factor depends on level of another input factor

ANOVA
Statistical technique used to investigate and model relationship between a response variable and one or more independent variables
Each independent variable is called as factor

Each factor has two or more levels

Hypothesis
H0: Population means of each level are equal
H1: At least one of the level means are not all equal

Why use ANOVA instead of t test?


ANOVA and two sample t test give identical result for mean with one factor and two levels
But real world modeling require more than one factor Thus, ANOVA can simultaneously test several factors each with several levels

Steps in design of experiments


1. Identify factors of interest and response variable
2. Determine appropriate levels of each explanatory variable 3. Determine design structure 4. Randomize the order in which each set conditions is run and collect the result data 5. Organise the results to draw appropriate conclusions

Factorial Design : Full factorial design


A full factorial design of experiments consists of the following: Vary one factor at a time Perform experiments for all levels of all factors Hence perform a large number of experiments that are needed! All interactions are captured
Consider a simple design for the following case: Let the number of factors = k

Let the number of levels for the ith factor = ni


The total number of experiments (N) that need to be K performed is

N ni
i 1

Factorial Essentials
Notation System E.g. 2x3, 2 IV, one with 2 level, one with 3 and 6 total conditions

Factorial Matrix
2x2 presentation rate
2-sec/word 4-sec/word

type of training

Imagery Rote

* Dependent variable: Words remembered by viewer

Main Effects
Overall effect of an Independent Variable (IV) on a dependent variable

Main Effect Calculation

Main effect of training effect = 20-15 = 5 Imagery produces better results than rote by 5 words Main effect of presentation rate = 14.5-20.5 = -6 2-sec/word produces a worse result than 4-sec/word by -6

Interactions
Teaching Style
Lab
Science Humanity
80 70

Lectures
70 80

Interaction Effects
*No main effect is present in the above case Interactions Major at Lab 80 70 = -10 80 the size or direction of the simple main Major at Lects 70 80 = 10 75 IV1 changing various levels of IV2 Major at Science at80 70 = -10 Major at Humanity 70 80 = 10 70
65 Science Lab Lectures Humanity Mean 85

effect on DV of

Interaction effect
Interaction effect occurs when one factor effects the results differently depending upon the second factor
12

10

Intensity

0 A B

Exercise
Dr ug 2

Dr ug 1

Dr ug 3

Dr ug 4

No interaction between exercise and drugs

Subtle Effect
30.0 25.0

20.0

Intensity

15.0

10.0

5.0

0.0 A B C D

Exercise
Dr ug 1 Dr ug 2 Dr ug 3 Dr ug 4

Dramatic Interaction
8.0 7.0 6.0

5.0

Intensity

4.0

3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0 A B

Exercise
Dr ug 2

Dr ug 1

Dr ug 3

Dr ug 4

Experiment

Experiment
Information on the earnings of men and women for different occupations was collected. Suppose that the aim of the experiment is to investigate whether there were any differences between the weekly salaries ($) of men and women employed as computer programmers, contractors and doctors.
A sample of 10 men and 10 women was selected from each of the three occupations, and the weekly salary for each individual in the sample was recorded.

Considering 0.05 level of significance, we need to test for any significant effect due to occupation, gender and interaction.

Terminology
Response variable Weekly Income ($) Factors A) Gender B) Occupation Levels A) Male | Female B) Comp Programmer | Contractor | Doctor Replication 60/(2x3) = 10 replications Interaction Dependency of effect of gender on different occupations or Dependency of effect of occupations on different gender

Hypothesis
Gender H0: Average salary for males and females are same. H1: Average salary for males and females are different. Occupation H0: Average salary for doctors, contractors and computer programmers is same. H1: Average salary for doctors, contractors and computer programmers is different. Interaction H0: There is no interaction effect taking place. H1: There is some interaction effect taking place.

Data Set

Between-Subjects Factors N
Comp Programmer Occupation Contractor Doctor Gender Female Male 20 20 20 30 30

Data Summary
Descriptive Statistics Dependent Variable: Weekly Salary Occupation Comp Programmer Gender Female Male Mean 741.30 796.00 Std. Deviation 78.942 86.340 N 10 10

Total
Female Contractor Male Total Female Doctor Male Total Female Total Male Total

768.65
634.70 979.40 807.05 930.90 1046.90 988.90 768.97 940.77 854.87

85.267
109.283 104.198 205.104 100.507 91.001 110.674 155.878 140.991 170.932

20
10 10 20 10 10 20 30 30 60

Analysis
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: Weekly Salary Source Corrected Model Intercept Occupation Gender Occupation * Gender Error Total Corrected Total Type III Sum of Squares 1230024.533
a

df 5 1 2 1

Mean Square 246004.907

F 26.901

Sig. .000 .000 .000 .000

Partial Eta Squared .714 .989 .529 .473

43847821.06 7 553693.633 442728.600

43847821.06 4794.805 7 276846.817 442728.600 30.273 48.413

233602.300
493822.400 45571668.00 0 1723846.933

2
54 60 59

116801.150
9144.859

12.772

.000

.321

a. R Squared = .714 (Adjusted R Squared = .687)

Profile Plots: Interaction Effect


The slopes for each level of occupation are different from each other, hinting at existence of interaction effects.

Crossing of 2 lines (Programmer and Contractor) indicate significant effect on wages due to gender in the occupations. This might be attributed to the job requirements of the occupation

Profile Plots: Interaction Effect


The slopes for each level of occupation are different from each other, hinting at existence of interaction effects.

Inverse movement of 2 lines (Programmer and Contractor) indicate significant effect on wages due to gender in the occupations. This might be attributed to the job requirements of the occupation

Conclusion
Gender Reject H0 -> Average salary for males and females are different Occupation Reject H0 -> Average salaries for doctors, contractors and computer programmers are different Interaction Reject H0 -> There is some interaction effect taking place between gender and occupation

Thank You

You might also like