1. Chlorination Plant 2. Desalination Plant a. Clarification b. Filtration c. RO Desalination 3. Demineralization Plant 4. Waste Water Treatment Plant
Plant Optimizing Tanjung Jati B Unit 1&2
1. Chlorination Schematic Flow Diagram SEAWATER INLET PUMP PUMP SELF CLEANING STRAINER MANUAL STRAINER GENERATORTR AIN A TR/RE + - GENERATORTR AIN B TR/RE GAS RELEASE CYLINDER + - GAS RELEASE CYLINDER Desalination Plant Overview a. Clarification b. Filtration Section c. Reverse Osmosis
RO Desalination Product as Feed Demineralization Plant Cation Exchanger Anion Exchanger Mixed Bed 3. Demineralization Overview 4. Waste Water Treatment Overview Waste Water Treatment Chlorination Plant Desalination Plant Demineralization Plant Waste Water Plant PLANT OPTIMIZING 1. Piping Connection From Demineralization Plant To Waste Water Treatment (Implemented) 2. Sediment Pond For FGD Blow Down (Planned) 3. RO Membrane Replacement Plan (Planned)
PIPING CONNECTION FROM DEMINERALIZATION PLANT TO WASTE WATER TREATMENT Regeneration Waste in Neutralizing Tank (DM Area) - High pH ( 11-12 ) - Direct Neutralizing by HCl until pH 6-9 - Discharge to The Sea Directly - Neutralize By Decrease pH - Environment Concern Only pH, Because Chemical Used Only NaOH and HCl
Retention Basin Water (WWTP Area) - Relatively Low pH at WWTP (pH 5-7) - There is pH Neutralizing Equipment - Accepted pH Range before discharging to The Sea 6-9 - Neutralize By Increase pH SEA Original Design Installing Pipeline Connection to WWTP Retention Basin Action :
- About 1000 m Piping Connection was Implemented From Neutralizing Tank (DM Plant Area) to Retention Basin (WWTP Area) - Pumps and Control Instrument are used existing at DM Plant
Pipeline Connection to WWTP Retention Basin Overview Additional Pipeline Starting Point End Point Pipeline Overview BOLER TURBINE AREA Progress IMPLEMENTED Agustus 2008
Done Well !!!! After Connection Neutralizing Tank (DM area) HCl The Sea RETENTION BASIN (WWTP AREA) NaOH Current Condition Regeneration Waste in Neutralizing Tank (DM Area) - No pH Neutralizing Required Before discharging to WWTP - Neutralized by Retention Basin Water
Waste Wa ter Treatment Plant Condition Retention Basin (WWTP Area) - pH Increasing Assisted by New Waste Supply from DM Plant - There is pH Neutralizing Equipment, but Decreasing of Operating Time 2. Sediment Pond for FGD Blow down at WWTP Area Background High TSS ( +10 % solid) Flue Gas Desulphurization Blowdown to Retention Basin Performance of WWTP is not for High Solid Treatment No Dredging Access for Retention Basin so, Heavy Equipment Needed for Retention Basin Dredging Activity Operational of WWTP Cannot be Stopped for Long Time DM Plant Boiler Blow down FGD Blow down WWTP SYSTEM RETENTION BASIN Sludge FGD FGD SLUDGE Current Condition Planned Action FGD Sediment Pond Required > Required Condition Sediment Pond consist of two Side ( A and B ) to Accommodate continuity of FGD Blowdown Must Be Easy Accessed By Wheel Loader, Wheel Loader In charged By Material Handling Operation Completed by Control System and Integrated with WWTP Operating Panel, and Operational In charged by WWTP Operator Will Reduce Issue for Environment, Because FGD Blow down Sludge is not Part Of Hazardous Waste
RETENTION BASIN WWTP SYSTEM DM Plant Boiler Blow down FGD SEDIMENT POND FGD Blow down Planned Illustration FGD Sediment Pond Technical Overview PROGRESS
Will be Implemented ASAP!!!!
3. RO Membrane Replacement Plan HISTORY The existing RO Membrane is TOYOBO Product with series HB10255SI Current condition has been in operation in average of more than 2 years without Spare membrane replacement. (for RO B is almost 3 years / tactical time) Manual book by Toyobo, it is advisable to replace 10-15% per year Current RO membrane conditions, it is found defective product in the form of an imperfect molding off "cap RO membrane cover. The trend of increasing product conductivity, current average conditions is above 300 us / cm. Estimated normal membrane operation life time that still "cover" reasonable make-Up Plant Feed is less than one year (estimation) if no RO membrane replacement. Background of the RO membrane replacement Special order for existing RO Membrane [to have more competitive price] The warranty existing product is not valid
Technical Review Comparison between Spiral Wound and Hollow Fiber Spiral Wound Hollow Fiber Technical Review Some Problem Found : Demineralization Plant units 1 and feeds to make up: conductivity <300us/cm (TDS + 205 ppm) RO Product as Feed Of Demineralization Plant Requirements ITEM TOYOBO TORAY METITO Replacement of existing elements New trains New trains PROCESS DESCRIPTION One Stage with Hollow Fibre One Stage with Spiral Wound Two Stages with Spiral Wound (existing membrane type) type type
Product Quality (Condutivity) inlet 51 500 54600 uS/cm 51 500 54600 uS/cm 51 500 54600 uS/cm outlet 1st stage < 250 uS/cm 350 max value at one stage 1st stage <750 uS/cm outlet 2nd stage second Stage <30 uS/cm Membrane manufacturer Toyobo Toray several manufacturers AVAILABLE OPTION Spiral Wound Turbidity, NTU < 1.0 < 1.0 Silt Density Index, SDI < 3.0 < 3.0 Iron, Fe+3, ppm < 0.3 < 0.05 Strontium, ppm NS < 0.1 Barium, ppm NS < 0.1 Silica, reject, ppm 50-160 50-160 Organics, ppm NS NS Chlorine, residual, ppm 0.1-0.5 max 0 pH Range 4-6 4-11 Feed Temperature Max, o C 35 45 Parameter Control - manufacture Hollow Fibre Base on Parameter Control Spiral Wound Type of Membrane can be applied by existing Condition pre-treatment before entering Membrane More concern only about chlorine residual because currently Residual Chlorine still 0.2 ppm feed the Membrane Can be solve by Anti-Chlorine Chemical Injection PROGRESS