harassment Q1 : Do you agree that affirmative action programmes are discriminatory and should therefore be opposed? Discuss. Definition of Affirmative action
Programs taking races and sex of employee into account as a part to correct the imbalances in employment that exist as a result of the past discrimination, either to the company itself or in the larger society. More than a paper work, involves policies, practices, and procedures. Company contracted with government are required to develop affirmative action. Brown v Board of Education case, Executive Order 10925, Equal Pay Act, Civil Rights Act, Age discrimination in employment act.
Why NEED Affirmative Action ? To compensate justice help repair the past Permit fair competition allow equal job opportunity increase diversity in the company Allow minorities with different demographic to lead Avoid certain group of effected people and minorities from getting lower pay
HOWEVER .. AA leads to some ISSUES that are debated AA itself is self-bias AA is showing a preference for selecting and/or promoting members of a demographic that has a history of discrimination Unfair to non-discrimination parties Violate the rights of the majority as AA required to hire more of the minorities and reduce them even though the minorities might have lower competency. Perception that might inherent in the minorities can only be success with AA AA is unnecessary A society cannot be truly colour-blind until they stop making decision based on colour(races)
Conclusion Partially support AA, as
Kantian Theory : 2nd maxim, put yourself in the shoes of those being discriminate Utilitarian Theory : Increase efficiency in workplace, provide greatest benefits to all Moral Rights : Everyone should be treated equally E.g : The percent of black males in government contract labour increased from 5.8 percent to 6.7 percent between 1974 and 1980, compared with an increase of 5.3 to 5.9 percent in non-contractor industries, according to Jonathan Leonard in the Journal of Economic Perspectives
On the other side, AA should be carried out in a way that benefits all include the non discriminate parties.
2(a) Human beings are sexual creatures, and when men and women work together, there may be sexual overtones to their interactions. They are naturally sexually attracted to one another. Laws and codes governing sexual harassment are ridiculous and put employers into unnecessarily litigious situations. As such these should be abolished. Discuss. Definition of sexual harassment: Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favours and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature Sexual attention imposed on someone who is not in a position to refuse it
2 types of sexual harassment: Quid pro quo Hostile work environment Quid pro quo means giving something in return for something else. Occurs when a supervisor makes and employees employment opportunities conditional on the employees entering into a sexual relationship with, or granting sexual favours to, the supervisor.
Im gonna make her an offer she cant refuse Quoted in The Godfather.
A sexual threat as it violates the rights of the person being threatened. Lead to a damaging and psychologically state of mind
Hostile work environment is a behaviour of a sexual nature that is distressing to women and interferes with their ability to perform on the job. Sexually implicit emails, leering at or ogling a women, sexist remarks about womens bodies I agree that there may be sexual overtones in our interactions:
But when do we know we have gone overboard? Ones interpretation towards a statement and be different to another
However, to consider an act to be sexual harassment, it has to be persistent in nature.
I do not agree that law and codes should be abolished: To protect woman from being sexually harassed due to inequivalent power between employer and employee. Without laws, there would be ignorance. Women will be sexually harrrased everyday and eventually, lead to mental breakdown. However, we should not depend on laws for protection because:
Prevention is better than cure
Women should dress in a respectful manner that would not provoke the sexual desires within men. Tell colleague that she is uncomfortable in this situation and should not be continued. If persist, report to high management. Last resort will be seeking legal advice if all else fail. 2b. Are employees consented to sexual conduct on the part of the employer? No because employees are only obligated to provide his or her best knowledge and skill to work. There are laws governing sexual harassment which is under the Employment Act.
Employers responsibilities: Provide safe working environment and to take reasonable care of employees well being. Enforce the Code of Practice on the Prevention and Eradication of Sexual Harassment in Workplace to prevent sexual harassment and to provide for procedures for investigation and punishment of sexual harassment. Q3 : Show why racial discrimination is immoral by means of the utilitarian, the Kantian and Rawslian approaches
Approaches If theres racial discrimination Utilitarian the happiness of the greatest number of people in the society is considered the greatest good. 1. Society will not live in peace 2. Discrimination will past on and forever Kantian 1 st maxim Do unto others like you want others to do unto you 1. No one would like to be discriminate 2. Sympathy
Rawlsian 1 st Principle: Liberty 2 nd Principle : Justice over Efficiency and Welfare 1. Minorities are not treated equally 2. Workplace efficiency cannot be raise, as well as social welfeare
Q4: It is Johnson Controls policy that women who are pregnant or who are capable of bearing children will not be placed into jobs involving lead exposures or which could expose them to lead through the exercise of job bidding, bumping, transfer or promotional rights (Beauchamp et al. 2009). Assess the moral arguments raised by such a policy.
Core Issues Is the policy fair? Is the company looking seriously on safety issues and occupational health in the workplace? Is it necessary to create a policy for employers to always inform employees about any dangerous or harmful activities? Under the common workers rights, nowadays companies must provide a safe workplace, the options stands on employees, they have the moral rights to refuse performing a dangerous job. Women workforce increases, can women be excluded out from certain jobs or jobs that affect their reproductive abilities, without justifying for themselves? The problems is whether the company can limit the exposure to the dangerous workplace. To prevent from the hazards that will damage your reproductive system.
Sexual Discrimination Because of women workforce increased. Women workers are now more being exposed to the harmful workplace. Lead may affect a pregnant womens blood stream and damage the brain of the child. Mother may also suffer from skin diseases and cancer. Because of the risks, some women request the right to switch or transfer jobs to prevent themselves from the reproductive risks. -Elsie Nason, experienced a wage decrease when she transferred out of a job in which she was exposed to lead Men suffer the same thing. -Donald Penney filed a lawsuit against the company fetal-protection policy, as he was denied a leave of absence so that he could lower his lead level because he intended to become a father. Sexual Discrimination However, the company did not show equal concern for the reproductive risks of men. This showed the illegal sexual discrimination because employers exclude pregnant women and women who are capable of bearing children from the same job because of reproductive risks. The reproductive hazard happens when either of the parents are exposed to the lead. For Kantian grounds, no one would be willing to be discriminated against on the basis of gender. The fetal-protection policies should apply to both sexes.
Moral Rights Johnson has the obligation and responsibility not to inflict harm. Employees (Male and female) must be given equal employees/workers rights such as employer must provide a safe workplace for you to work in, and will not discriminate against you. They must be given a choice. To have a safe workplace, employees should be given information about the likelihood of danger which being exposed to the harm. Foster, being bared because she wants to work in a assembly line which has high lead exposure. Even though Foster says she has no intention to become pregnant, the company strictly requests a medical documentation to show that she is sterile The policy also offered women a choice of becoming sterile or losing their jobs. Moral rights shall be hold by both gender, its their choice to accept the risks without fear in order to keep their job no matter female or male, if Foster has no intention to become pregnant, Foster should be hired..