may call an extraordinary general meeting. At the annual general meeting, the CEO and director typically speak, and present annual report, which contains information for shareholders about its performance and strategy. Generally, Company Secretary would arrange for the meeting, would inform shareholders about agenda, place and issues to be discussed in AGM, well in advance
Generally meeting starts with voting on resolutions Chief election officer is responsible for counting of votes Voting can be done simply by counting number of hands (show of hands) or by proxy This is followed by strategy and performance discussion and lastly questions from investors are discussed Disadvantage of manual counting? What do smaller listed companies do to conduct AGM? They hire individuals, some of their own employees Provide these individuals with travelling cost etc. to be present in meetings Why does this philosophy work in India?
Ordinary resolutions such as election and removal of directors, appointment of external auditors, remuneration of directors, payment of dividend, and the routine matters relating to the conduct of a company are passed with the approval of more than 50 per cent of the shareholders present and voting. Special resolutions such as buy-back of shares, proposed merger or de-merger, changing the name of the company, altering the registered address of the company from one state to another, voluntary winding up of the company require approval of 75 per cent of those present and voting. Shareholders who do not attend the meeting in person are asked to vote by proxy The proxy process or proxy voting is the term used to describe the means for shareholders to participate in a companys annual shareholders meeting, without attending the meeting.
Shareholders may vote by proxy online, by mail or by telephone. A proxy also refers to the authority or instrument that permits another individual to vote on a shareholders behalf at an annual or special shareholder meeting (like investing in Mutual funds) Proxy may also mean the person empowered to act as an agent to vote on behalf of the shareholder. Duration of annual general Meeting - Generally 1-1.5 hours - In case of India Bulls 15 minutes (all time record low) SEBI, investigating the matter Voting Pattern of MFs for 2011- 12 In 2010, a SEBI circular required mutual funds (MF) to vote on resolutions and publicly disclose their voting records. Why were MFs not voting? MFs invest in 500-600 firms
AGMs generally line up all together
They are suppose to look and made decision on each resolution Best alternative is to outsource to Proxy advisory firms Proxy advisory firms
These firms recommend how an investor should vote on resolutions. In the US, where the practice is pretty much entrenched It is estimated that MFs pay around 0.1 per cent of their assets under management (AUM) as fees for such advice. With an estimated AUM of just over Rs 7 lakh crore in India, the growth potential for proxy advisory firms can be enormous. In India, mainly two proxy advisory firms are operating - InGovern and IIAS - Institutional investor Advisory Services India Scope of services Voting Recommendations Corporate Governance research and scorecards Risk Monitoring Directors and Executive Compensation analysis
9.0 percent of companies were non- complaint with clause 49 of companies act; with less than 50.0 percent independent directors and no independent chairman 9.0 percent of directors have outside directorships in more than 10 public companies One in five directors attend less than 75.0 percent of board meetings 22.0 percent of independent directors have served on the board for more than 9 years
Only 45 companies had audit committees comprising only of independent directors 13 companies have not constituted a remuneration committee 53 companies have had the same auditor for over five years
HDFC Mutual Fund, the countrys one of the largest asset manager, voted in 393 resolutions, about 80 per cent of the approximate 470 resolutions. In 2011-12, it had voted in about 40 per cent of the proposals.
Top MF firms such as HDFC MF and ICICI Prudential, when they voted, hardly opposed the management. For example, HDFC MF voted in favor of 390 proposals and against three. In comparison, a survey of voting trends by MFs in the US showed that they disagreed with the management 5-20 per cent of the times
Primarily Concerned With Public Listed Companies I.E. Those Listed On A Stock Exchange Focused On Preventing Corporate Collapses Such As Enron, and The Maxwell Companies