DBM issued a circular entitled the "Guidelines on the Review of MFO's and Performance Indicators (PIs) and restructuring of programs, Activities and Projects (PAPs)" the circular aims to restructure in order to have a common methodology to be applied to Major Final Outputs (mfo) and PIs and PAPs. The rationale of restructuring of PAPs is to establish the link of the PAPs to the MFOs for better budget cost estimates
DBM issued a circular entitled the "Guidelines on the Review of MFO's and Performance Indicators (PIs) and restructuring of programs, Activities and Projects (PAPs)" the circular aims to restructure in order to have a common methodology to be applied to Major Final Outputs (mfo) and PIs and PAPs. The rationale of restructuring of PAPs is to establish the link of the PAPs to the MFOs for better budget cost estimates
DBM issued a circular entitled the "Guidelines on the Review of MFO's and Performance Indicators (PIs) and restructuring of programs, Activities and Projects (PAPs)" the circular aims to restructure in order to have a common methodology to be applied to Major Final Outputs (mfo) and PIs and PAPs. The rationale of restructuring of PAPs is to establish the link of the PAPs to the MFOs for better budget cost estimates
and Performance Indicators (PIs) and Restructuring of Programs, Activities and Projects (PAPs).
The circular aims to restructure in order to have a common methodology to be applied to Major Final Outputs (MFOs) and Performance Indicators (PIs) and Programs, Activities & Projects (PAPs). Also, to develop standards for Organizational Performance Indicators Framework (OPIF) throughout the government bureaucracy. The OPIF is a result-based budgeting system which serve as basis for allocating the budget and monitoring, reporting and evaluation of the department/agency performance. As the basic element of OPIF, MFO must represent the core mandated functions of the department/agency. MFO are the goods or services that a department/agency is mandated to deliver to external clients; PAPs are the activities undertaken to produce, or drive the attainment of MFOs. Each MFO consist of two sets of Performance Indicators (PIs). These PIs must be measurable in terms of QUANTITY, QUALITY, TIMELINESS and COST. These parameters serve as basis for assessing the department/agencys performance in achieving its targets. The rationale of restructuring of PAPS is to establish the link of the PAPs to the MFOs for better budget cost estimates and prioritization of expenditures. Activities that do not fall within the legal mandate of the agency or not linked to an MFO should be restructured or should be drop-off. The 2014 National Planning Conference aims to formulate the 2015-2016-2017 budget, plans and targets and revalidate the 2014 plans and targets. 1. Review of fertilizer and pesticide as well as financial and administrative policies needed in the formulation of our plans and programs for the CY s 2015-2026-2017 2. Review and update on the technical and legal issues relative to the enforcement, monitoring and inspection, among others. 3. Review, formulate and conduct of Gender and Development Mainstreaming activities of the Department of Agriculture and FPA in particular; 4. Review and validation of CY 2014 plans and targets relative to the regional/provincial municipal monitoring and enforcement activities such as conduct of clean-up drives and inspection of handlers, warehouses, among others.
1. Common understanding relative to the CY 2014 sets of Performance Indicators provided by the Department of Budget and Management (DBM); 2. Craft and polish the CY 2015-2016-2017 plans and targets for submission to DA and DBM 3. Validate 2014-2015 plans and programs by regional/provincial/municipal levels.