Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and Management
Education
Vasanthi Srinivasan
Associate Professor
Indian Institute of
Management Bangalore
Why CR is prominent
today
• Business is more pervasive and powerful
• Major accounting & governance scandals
• Visible impacts of economic activity (e.g.
pollution, global warming)
• Failures/limitations of government
• Media spotlight on business activities
• Active NGOs monitoring corporate performance
• Reputational risk due to greater visibility &
criticism of corporate practices
Role of Management
Education
• Growing criticism of management education
– Assumptions of a rational economic self interested human
being
– Dominant theories are economic – agency, information
processing view, transaction cost
– Do we create leaders who impact society or self centered
individuals?
– Emphasis on content seen as meaningful rather than emphasis
on process
– Faculty themselves ambivalent about ethics, responsibility and
citizenship in teaching and of course capability
Recent evidence from
research
• MBA schools are brainwashing institutions
educating their students on relatively narrow
shareholder ideology (Emiliani, 2006, Ghoshal,
2005, Matten & Moon, 2004, Mintzberg et al,
2002)
• MBA education does make students more self
centered. It reduces helping and supportive
behaviours which are critical and needed in
organizations. (Enderle, 2001, Venkat, 2006)
State of CR education
across the world
• Piece meal and fragmented in most business
schools
• Some schools offer experiential learning on
responsibility through internships
• Four types of courses offered under this
umbrella – CSR, Business Ethics, Corporate
Governance and Business and Society
• Few faculty champions; not mainstreamed
Highlights of 1st National Survey on CR
teaching and research in management
schools in India, 2007; Partners in Change)
Covering 104 leading -- Management
Institutes across 18 States…
• 100% of the respondents agreed that
they needed to take the lead in
facilitating and producing dynamic
leadership in youth for social and
environmental stewardship
• 93% that B School ratings/rankings
should include their CR Teaching and
Research performance and practice
Contd.
ORGANIZATION
RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS
STAKEHOLDER INDIVIDUALS
SESSION 1:
-- CHANGING LANDSCAPES
SESSION 2:
UNDERSTANDING BUSINESS SOCIETY
INTERRELATIONSHIPS
SESSION 3:
– UNDERSTANDING THE STAKEHOLDERS FOR AN
ORGANIZATION
SESSION 4:
DECIDING WHAT IS RIGHT: ETHICAL THEORIES AND
MANAGERIAL ROLES
SESSION 5:
– ETHICS AND DECISION MAKING
RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS :
ORGANIZATIONAL
SESSION 6:
– INSTITUTIONALIZING ETHICS AND RESPONSIBILITY: THE PLANNING
PROCESS
SESSION 7:
– INSTITUTIONALIZING ETHICS AND RESPONSIBILITY: STRUCTURES
SESSION 8:
– INSTITUTIONALIZING ETHICS AND RESPONSIBILITY: CULTURE
SESSION 9:
STAKE HOLDER MANAGEMENT: EMPLOYEES
SESSION 10:
– STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT: CONSUMERS
RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS :
SOCIETAL
SESSION 11:
– STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT: SUPPLY CHAIN
SESSION 12:
– STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT: SHAREHOLDER
SESSION 13:
STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT: ENVIRONMENT
SESSION 14:
– STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT: COMMUNITY
SESSION 15:
– STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT: GOVERNMENT
RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS :
SOCIETAL
SESSION 16:
– UNDERSTANDING THE FIRM PERFORMANCE LINKAGE
SESSION 17:
– CHALLENGES IN EMERGING MARKETS 1: CORRUPTION
SESSION 18:
– CHALLENGES IN EMERGING MARKETS 2: COMPLIANCE TO
GLOBAL AGREEMENTS
SESSION 19:
– GLOBAL CONTEXT, DIVERSE CULTURES: HOW DO ETHICS AND
CSR DIFFER IN CROSS CULTURAL ENVIRONMENTS?
SESSION 20:
– GLOBAL CONTEXT, DIVERSE CULTURES: HOW DO ETHICS AND
CSR DIFFER IN CROSS CULTURAL ENVIRONMENTS?
Cognitive competence in
Ethics
• Moral awareness
• Moral understanding
• Moral reasoning
• Moral decision making
• Moral tolerance