You are on page 1of 39

Chapter Four

Motivation in
Organizations
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-2
Chapter Objectives
Characterize the nature of motivation,
including its importance and basic historical
perspectives.
Describe the need-based perspectives on
motivation.
Explain the major process-based
perspectives on motivation.
Describe learning-based perspectives on
motivation.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-3
The Nature of Motivation
Motivation
The set of forces that leads people to behave in a
particular way.
The Importance of Motivation
Managers strive to motivate the organizations
people to perform at high levels.
Job performance depends on ability, motivation,
and environment.
P = M + A + E when:
P = performance M= motivation
A = ability E = environment
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-4
Figure 4.1: The Motivational Framework
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-5
Historical Perspectives on Motivation
The Traditional Approach
Assumption: Employees are economically
motivated to work to earn as much money as they
can.
Conclusion: Incentive pay systems are a good motivation
Assumption: work is inherently unpleasant and
the money earned is more important to employees
than the nature of the job they are performing.
Conclusion: People can be expected to perform any kind
of job if they are paid enough.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-6
Historical Perspectives on Motivation
(continued)
The Human Relations Approach
Suggests that favorable attitudes result in
motivation to work hard.
Assumption: Employees want to feel useful and
important; employees have strong social needs; and
those needs are more important than money when
motivating employees.
Conclusion: Managers should make workers feel
important and allow them a modicum of self-direction and
self-control in carrying out routine activities.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-7
Historical Perspectives on Motivation
(continued)
The Human Resource Approach
Assumption: Employees want and are able to
make genuine contributions to the organization.
Whereas the human relationists believe the illusion of
contribution of and participation will enhance motivation,
the human resources view assumes the contributions
themselves are valuable to both individuals and
organizations.
Managements task is to:
encourage participation
create a work environment that makes full
use of the human resources available
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-8
Need-Based Perspectives on Motivation
Needs-Based Theories
Humans are motivated primarily by deficiencies in
one or more important needs or need categories.
Need theorists have attempted to identify and
categorize the needs that are most important to
people.
The best known need theories are the hierarchy of
needs, ERG, and dual-structure theories.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-9
Hierarchy of Needs Theory
Maslows Hierarchy of Needs
Assumes human needs are arranged in a
hierarchy of importance, as shown in
Figure 4.2 on the next slide.
Maslow believed each need level must be
satisfied before the level above it can
become important.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-10
Figure 4.2: The Hierarchy of Needs
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-11
ERG Theory
ERG Theory of Motivation
Extends and refines Maslows needs hierarchy
concept
Describes existence, relatedness, and growth
needs
In contrast to Maslows approach, ERG theory
includes a satisfaction progression component
and a frustration-regression component.
The satisfaction-progression component suggests that
after satisfying one category of needs, a person
progresses to the next need.
The frustration-regression component suggest that a
person who is frustrated by trying to satisfy a higher level
of needs eventually will regress to the preceding level.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-12
Dual-Structure Theory
Development of the Theory
Frederick Herzberg and his associates developed the dual-
structure theory in the late 1950s and early 1960s.
Herzberg asked a group of participants in a study to recall
times when they felt especially satisfied and motivated by
their jobs and times when the felt particularly dissatisfied and
unmotivated.
To his surprise, Herzberg found that entirely different
sets of factors were associated with the two kinds of
feelings about work, which he called motivation factors
and hygiene factors.
Motivation factors -- intrinsic to the work itself and include
factors such as achievement and recognition.
Hygiene factors -- extrinsic to the work itself and include
factors such as pay and job security.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-13
Figure 4.3: The
Dual-Structure
Theory of
Motivation
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-14
Outcome of the Dual-Structure Theory
Motivation Factors
Motivation factors, such as achievement and
recognition, were often cited as primary causes of
satisfaction and motivation.
Hygiene Factors
Hygiene factors, such as pay, job security,
supervisors, and working conditions, could lead to
dissatisfaction and lack of motivation.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-15
Other Important Needs
The Need for Achievement
The desire to accomplish a task or goal
more effectively than in the past.
The Need for Affiliation
The need for human companionship.
The Need for Power
The desire to control the resources in ones
environment
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-16
Process-Based Perspectives on Motivation
Process-Based Theories
Deal with how motivation occurs
Rather than attempting to identify motivational
stimuli, process perspectives focus on why people
choose certain behavioral options to satisfy their
needs and how they evaluate their satisfaction
after they have attained those goals.
Useful Process Perspectives
Three useful process perspectives are equity
theory, expectancy and theory, and goal setting
theory.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-17
Equity Theory of Motivation
Equity Theory
Is the belief that one is being treated fairly in
relation to others; inequity is the belief that one is
being treated unfairly in relation to others.
Social Comparisons
Involves evaluating our own situation in terms of
others situations.
Four Step Process
People in organizations form perceptions about
the equity of their treatment through a four-step
process.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-18
Forming Equity Perceptions
Step 1: A person evaluates how he or she is
being treated by the firm.
Step 2: The person forms a perception of how
a comparison other is being treated.
Step 3: The person compares his or her own
circumstances with those of the comparison
other to form an impression of either equity or
inequity.
Step 4: On the strength of this feeling, the
person may choose to pursue one or more
alternatives.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-19
Figure 4.4: Responses to Perceptions of
Equity and Inequity
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-20
Evaluation and Implications of Equity Theory
Managerial Implications
Everyone in the organization needs to understand
the basis for rewards.
People tend to take a multifaceted view of their
rewards; they perceive and experience a variety of
rewards, some tangible and others intangible.
People base their actions on their perceptions of
reality. If two or more people make exactly the
same salary, but each thinks the other makes
more, each will base his or her experiences of
equity on the perception, not the reality.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-21
Expectancy Theory of Motivation
The Basic Expectancy Model
Suggests that people are motivated by how
much they want something and the
likelihood they perceive of getting it.
Effort-to-Performance Expectancy
A persons perception of the probability
that efforts will lead to performance.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-22
Expectancy Theory of Motivation (continued)
Performance-to-Outcome Expectancy
An individuals perception of the probability that
performance will lead to certain outcomes.
Outcomes and Valences
An outcome is anything that results from
performing a particular behavior.
Valence is the degree of attractiveness or
unattractiveness a particular outcome has for a
person.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-23
Figure 4.5: The Expectancy Theory of
Motivation
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-24
The Porter-Lawler Model
Since its original conception, the
expectancy theory model has been
refined and extended many times.
Although convention wisdom argues
that satisfaction leads to performance,
Porter and Lawler argued the reverse: If
rewards are adequate, high levels of
performance may lead to satisfaction.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-25
The Porter-Lawler Model (continued)
According to the model, at the beginning of
the motivational cycle, effort is a function of
the value of the potential reward for the
employee (its valence) and the perceived
effort-reward probability (an expectancy).
Effort then combines with abilities, traits, and
role perceptions to determine actual
performance.

Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-26
Figure 4.6: The Porter-Lawler Model
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-27
Evaluation and Implications of Expectancy
Theory
Expectancy Theory offers several important
guidelines for the practicing manager.
1. Determine the primary outcomes each employee wants.
2. Decide what levels and kinds of performance are needed to
meet organizational goals.
3. Make sure the desired levels of performance are possible.
4. Link desired outcomes and desired performance.
5. Analyze the situation for conflicting expectancies.
6. Make sure the rewards are large enough.
7. Make sure the overall system is equitable for everyone.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-28
Learning-Based Perspectives on Motivation
Learning is a relatively permanent change in
behavior or behavioral potential that results
from direct or indirect experience.
It is a key component in employee motivation.
In any organization, employees quickly learn
which behaviors are rewarded and which are
ignored or punished.
Thus, learning plays a critical role in
maintaining motivated behavior.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-29
How Learning Occurs
The Traditional View: Classical Conditioning
Classical conditioning is a simple form of learning
the links a conditioned response with an
unconditional stimulus. Learning theorists soon
recognized that although classical conditioning
offered some interesting insights into the learning
process, it was inadequate as an explanation for
human learning.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-30
How Learning Occurs (continued)
The Contemporary View: Learning as a
Cognitive Process
Contemporary learning theory generally
views learning as a cognitive process; that
is, it assumes people are conscious, active
participants in how they learn. One of the
most well-known contemporary views of
learning is reinforcement theory.

Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-31
Reinforcement Theory and Learning
Based on the idea that behavior is a function
of its consequences.
Behavior that results in pleasant
consequences is more likely to be repeated,
and behavior that results in unpleasant
consequences is less likely to be repeated.
Assumes people consciously explore different
behaviors and systematically choose those that
result in the most desirable outcome.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-32
Types of Reinforcement in Organizations
Positive Reinforcement
A reward or other desirable consequence
that a person receives after exhibiting
behavior.
Avoidance, or negative reinforcement
The opportunity to avoid or escape from an
unpleasant circumstance after exhibiting
behavior.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-33
Types of Reinforcement in Organizations
(continued)
Extinction
Decreases the frequency of behavior by
eliminating a reward or desirable
consequence that follows that behavior
Punishment
Is an unpleasant, or aversive,
consequence that results from behavior.

Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-34
Table 4.1: Schedules of Reinforcement
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-35
Related Aspects of Learning
Social Learning
Occurs when people observe the
behaviors or others, recognize the
consequences, and alter their own
behaviors as a result.
Organizational Behavior Modification
Or OB mod, is the application of
reinforcement theory to people in
organizational settings.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-36
Figure 4.7:
Steps in
Organizational
Behavior
Modification
Source: Steps in Organizational Behavior
Modification from Personnel (July-August 1974).
Copyright 1974 American Management
Association. Reproduced with permission of the
American Management Association via Copyright
Clearance Center.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-37
The Effectiveness of OB Mod
OB Mod is a valuable method for improving
employee motivation in many situations.
Not all applications have worked.
Managers frequently have only limited means
for providing meaningful reinforcement for
their employees.
If OB mod works for a while, the impact of the
positive reinforcement may wane one the novelty
has worn off, and employees may come to view it
as a routine part of the compensation system.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-38
The Ethics of OB Mod
The primary ethical argument is that use of
OB mod compromises individual freedom of
choice.
Managers may tend to select reinforcement
contingencies that produce advantages for
the organization with little or no regard for
what is best for the individual employee.
OB mod also involves an element of
manipulation.
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4-39
Reinforcement Theory and Learning
Based on the idea that behavior is a function
of its consequences.
Behavior that results in pleasant
consequences is more likely to be repeated,
and behavior that results in unpleasant
consequences is less likely to be repeated.
It assumes people consciously explore different
behaviors and systematically choose those that
result in the most desirable outcome.

You might also like