Pros: - No impact on GSM as the system will be untouched (except for some possible minor movement of one antenna depending on existing arrangement) Cons: - additional rent cost for the extra TMA and antenna for UMTS - additional active elements means more points of failure.
Pros: - No impact on GSM as the system will be untouched (except for some possible minor movement of one antenna depending on existing arrangement) Cons: - additional rent cost for the extra TMA and antenna for UMTS - additional active elements means more points of failure.
Pros: - No impact on GSM as the system will be untouched (except for some possible minor movement of one antenna depending on existing arrangement) Cons: - additional rent cost for the extra TMA and antenna for UMTS - additional active elements means more points of failure.
Scenario Proprietary and Confidential Slide 2 Scenario 1: GSM Untouched Existing Configuration: 3 dual pol antennas (72 inches); antenna count can be increased 2 lines per antenna; additional lines can be installed 2 TMAs No RET
Proposed Configuration: Add one new AWS antenna (dual pol) with RET for UMTS (4 th antenna) Add two new feeder cables for UMTS and RET cable Add new AWS twin TMA
Proprietary and Confidential Slide 3 Scenario 1: GSM Untouched (continued) Pros: No impact on GSM as the system will be untouched (except for some possible minor movement of one antenna depending on existing arrangement) Easier implementation Azimuth and tilt can be independently adjusted for both GSM and UMTS
Cons: Additional rent cost for the extra TMA and antenna for UMTS Additional active elements means more points of failure Proprietary and Confidential Slide 4 GSM Untouched: Existing Configuration Proprietary and Confidential Slide 5 GSM Untouched : Proposed Configuration Actuator Most Preferred Least Preferred GSM Untouched Proprietary and Confidential Slide 6 Scenario 2: RET For All Existing Configuration: 3 dual pol antennas (72 inches); antenna count can be increased 2 lines per antenna; additional lines can be installed 2 TMAs No RET
Proposed Configuration (1): Add one new AWS antenna (dual pol) with RET for UMTS (4 th antenna) Replaced old PCS antennas with new antennas with RET capability Add two new feeder cables for UMTS and RET cables Replace existing TMAs with twin AWS/PCS TMAs
Proprietary and Confidential Slide 7 Scenario 2: RET For All (continued) Pros: GSM gets newer antennas and RET capability GSM gets new TMAs Azimuth and tilt can be independently adjusted for both GSM and UMTS
Cons: Cost for replacing GSM antennas and TMAs Additional rent cost for the extra TMA and antenna for UMTS Proprietary and Confidential Slide 8 RET For All: Existing Configuration Proprietary and Confidential Slide 9 RET For All: Proposed Configuration Actuators Most Preferred Least Preferred RET For ALL Proprietary and Confidential Slide 10 Scenario 3: I Love Quads Existing Configuration: 3 dual pol antennas (72 inches); antenna count cannot be increased 2 lines per antenna; additional lines can be installed 2 TMAs No RET
Proposed Configuration: Replace all antennas with quad pol AWS with RET capability Replace existing TMAs with new AWS/PCS twin TMAs Add two new feeder cables for UMTS and RET cables Proprietary and Confidential Slide 11 Scenario 3: I Love Quads (continued) Pros: Same antenna count (a plus for zoning, leasing and structural aspects) RET is separate between GSM and UMTS sharing the same quad pol antenna (independent tilt adjusted for GSM and UMTS)
Cons: Azimuth cannot be independently adjusted for the antenna where GSM and UMTS is located Proprietary and Confidential Slide 12 I Love Quads: Existing Configuration Proprietary and Confidential Slide 13 Actuators I Love Quads: Proposed Configuration Most Preferred Least Preferred I Love Quads Proprietary and Confidential Slide 14 Scenario 4: No Room To Grow Existing Configuration: 2 quad pol antennas (72 inches); antenna count cannot be increased 4 lines per antenna (no additional lines can be added) 2 TMAs No RET
Proposed Configuration: Replace all existing antennas with quad pol AWS with RET capability Replace existing TMAs with new AWS/PCS twin TMAs Combine GSM TRXs to free up 2 feeder cables for UMTS (ensure even combining of GSM TRXs)
Note: This scenario is applicable also for existing configuration using dual pol antennas and no new lines can be added
Proprietary and Confidential Slide 15 Scenario 4: No Room To Grow (continued) Pros: UMTS can be deployed on the site New antennas for GSM New TMAs for GSM Independent tilt and azimuth adjustment for both GSM and UMTS
Cons: Additional loss in GSM (due to combining) Increased cost to offset additional loss due to combining if MCPAs are used Loss of space diversity in GSM
Proprietary and Confidential Slide 16 No Room To Grow : Existing Configuration Proprietary and Confidential Slide 17 No Room To Grow : Proposed Configuration Actuators Most Preferred Least Preferred No Room To Grow Proprietary and Confidential Slide 18 Scenario 5: Two Few Lines Existing Configuration: 1 dual pol antenna (72 inches); antenna count cannot be increased 2 lines per antenna (no additional lines can be added) 2 TMAs No RET
Proposed Configuration: Replace all existing antennas with dual pol AWS with RET capability Replace existing TMAs with new Diplexer/TMA unit Diplex GSM and UMTS to fit into 2 lines Proprietary and Confidential Slide 19 Scenario 5: Two Few Lines (continued) Pros: UMTS can be deployed on the site New antenna for GSM New TMA for GSM Diplexing option is cheaper than MCPA
Cons: Additional loss in GSM and UMTS (due to diplexing but lower than combining) Possible intermodulation product at certain frequency pairs Azimuth and tilt cannot be independently adjusted for both GSM and UMTS
Proprietary and Confidential Slide 20 Two Few Lines: Existing Configuration Proprietary and Confidential Slide 21 Two Few Lines: Proposed Configuration Most Preferred Least Preferred Two Few Lines Proprietary and Confidential Slide 22 Summary (Level of Preference) Least Preferred Most Preferred G S M