This document discusses various projective psychological tests used by clinical psychologists to assess personality, including the Rorschach inkblot test, Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), Rosenzweig Picture Frustration Study, and Bender-Gestalt Test. It provides details on how each test is administered and analyzed, with a focus on the Rorschach inkblot test which uses inkblots to project unconscious aspects of personality based on perceptions of the ambiguous images.
This document discusses various projective psychological tests used by clinical psychologists to assess personality, including the Rorschach inkblot test, Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), Rosenzweig Picture Frustration Study, and Bender-Gestalt Test. It provides details on how each test is administered and analyzed, with a focus on the Rorschach inkblot test which uses inkblots to project unconscious aspects of personality based on perceptions of the ambiguous images.
This document discusses various projective psychological tests used by clinical psychologists to assess personality, including the Rorschach inkblot test, Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), Rosenzweig Picture Frustration Study, and Bender-Gestalt Test. It provides details on how each test is administered and analyzed, with a focus on the Rorschach inkblot test which uses inkblots to project unconscious aspects of personality based on perceptions of the ambiguous images.
as mental ability, mechanical aptitude or talent, masculinity, introversion and sociability. Also called dimensions of personality because they can be measured on a quantitative continuum They can be observed and tested objectively or inferred from observable, measurable behavior. Personality asks Big questions Who we are as people? Why we are the way we are as individual? Can we change?
Clinical psychologists use the personal interview and projective tests Projective techniques employ the Rorschach Test and Thematic Apperception Test. The Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement is used to categorized mental patients. Rating scales, behavior samples, self- inventories and test like the Incomplete sentences blank, the World Association Test, the Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration Test and the Bender-Gestalt Test are also used. Projective techniques. -assess personality by presenting ambiguous stimuli and requiring a subject to respond, projecting his or her personality into the responses. -the least measuring devices that psychologists used in an attempt to top elements of the unconscious mind. -It is the repository for events long forgotten which are in the unconscious mind.
Rorschach Inkblot Test -developed by Herman Rorschach, a Swiss psychologist in the early 1920s. He experimented with thousands of inkblots but settled for only 10. -The ambiguous inkblots -are perceived differently by different people, and those perceptions are believed to be related to the subjects' problems. Hermann Rorschach created the Rorschach inkblot test in 1921 -In this test, the person who is taking it is asked to tell what these inkblots look like to him, what they remind him or what they represent within this limit wide latitude is provided as to the number manner, location and content of the responses given. PHASES IN INKBLOT TEST -two phases are free association and the inquiry.
-The first or free association phase of the test administration is followed by more directed inquiry during which the examiner attempts to ascertain the areas and features of the blots which have given rise to the responses elicited. METHOD
The tester and subject typically sit next to each other at a table, with the tester slightly behind the subject. This is to facilitate a "relaxed but controlled atmosphere". There are ten official inkblots, each printed on a separate white card, approximately 18x24 cm in size. Five inkblots are of black ink, two are of black and red ink and three are multicolored, on a white background.
As the subject is examining the inkblots, the psychologist writes down everything the subject says or does, no matter how trivial. Analysis of responses is recorded by the test administrator using a tabulation and scoring sheet and, if required, a separate location chart.
EXAMPLE:
Test Results Sickness Quotient: 78% Your "Sickness Quotient" of 78% indicates therapy may be useful.
Detailed Diagnosis -Interpersonal Insights You have a positive attitude towards nearly everything, which is incredibly stupid and very annoying to those around you. Your friends (both of them) think you're a total clod. As long as you continue to buy the beer, however, they'll still be your pals. -Job Performance & Attitude You have a deep love for your patients, which is unfortunate since you're a veterinarian. You have little empathy for anyone more successful at work than you, which is pretty much everyone. -Personality Insight Your personal motto is "I am unique, just like everybody else." This makes everyone else happy, because they know there can't be two of you.
-the responses is scored in terms of location, determinants, and the content. -the interpreter pays attention to the emotional tone of the responses, their organizational features, their possible symbolic meaning, and many other characteristics -the test interpreter attempts to arrive at the whole picture of the person in terms of the unconscious.
When seeing card I, subjects often inquire on how they should proceed, and questions on what they are allowed to do with the card (e.g. turning it) are not very significant. Being the first card, it can provide clues about how subjects tackle a new and stressful task. It is not, however, a card that is usually difficult for the subject to handle, having readily available popular responses. Below are the ten inkblots of the Rorschach test. The red details of card II are often seen as blood, and are the most distinctive features. Responses to them can provide indications about how a subject is likely to manage feelings of anger or physical harm. This card can induce a variety of sexual responses. Card III is typically perceived to contain two humans involved in some interaction, and may provide information about how the subject relates with other people (specifically, response latency may reveal struggling social interactions). Card IV is notable for its dark color and its shading (posing difficulties for depressed subjects), and is generally perceived as a big and sometimes threatening figure; compounded with the common impression of the subject being in an inferior position ("looking up") to it, this serves to elicit a sense of authority. The human or animal content seen in the card is almost invariably classified as male rather than female, and the qualities expressed by the subject may indicate attitudes toward men and authority. Because of this Card IV is often called "The Father Card". Card V is an easily elaborated card that is not usually perceived as threatening, and typically instigates a "change of pace" in the test, after the previous more challenging cards. Containing few features that generate concerns or complicate the elaboration, it is the easiest blot to generate a good quality response about. Texture is the dominant characteristic of card VI, which often elicits association related to interpersonal closeness; it is specifically a "sex card", its likely sexual percepts being reported more frequently than in any other card, even though other cards have a greater variety of commonly seen sexual contents Card VII can be associated with femininity (the human figures commonly seen in it being described as women or children), and function as a "mother card", where difficulties in responding may be related to concerns with the female figures in the subject's life. The center detail is relatively often (though not popularly) identified as a vagina, which makes this card also relate to feminine sexuality in particular. People express relief about card VIII, which lets them relax and respond effectively. Similar to card V, it represents a "change of pace"; however, the card introduces new elaboration difficulties, being complex and the first multi-colored card in the set. Therefore, people who find processing complex situations or emotional stimuli distressing or difficult may be uncomfortable with this card. Characteristic of card IX is indistinct form and diffuse, muted chromatic features, creating a general vagueness. There is only one popular response, and it is the least frequent of all cards. Having difficulty with processing this card may indicate trouble dealing with unstructured data, but aside from this there are few particular "pulls" typical of this card. Card X is similar to card VIII, but its uncertainty and complexity are reminiscent of card IX: people who find it difficult to deal with many concurrent stimuli may not particularly like this otherwise pleasant card. Being the last card, it may provide an opportunity for the subject to "sign out" by indicating what they feel their situation is like, or what they desire to know. or TAT, is a projective psychological test. developed during the 1930s by the American psychologist Henry A. Murray. The TAT is popularly known as the picture interpretation technique because it uses a series of provocative yet ambiguous pictures about which the subject is asked to tell a story. Look at the picture. Your task is to write a complete story about the picture you see above. This should be an imaginative story with a beginning, middle, and an end. Try to portray who the people might be, what they are feeling, thinking, and wishing. Try to tell what led to the situation depicted in the picture and how everything will turn out in the end. Saul Rosenzweig became well known after publishing a paper discussing 'common factors' underlying competing approaches to psychotherapy. The Rosenzweig Picture Frustration Study is usually considered a semi-projective technique and involves an examinee responding verbally to a semi-ambiguous picture scenario. Each of the three forms (child, adolescent, and adult) consists of 24 comic strip pictures that portray a situation that might induce frustration. The overall purpose of the study is to assess how the examinee responds to frustration and frustrating situations. first developed by child neuro- psychiatrist Lauretta Bender. The test is used to evaluate "visual-motor maturity", to screen for developmental disorders, or to assess neurological function or brain damage. The original test consists of nine figures, each on its own 3 5 card. The subject is shown each figure and asked to copy it onto a piece of blank paper. The test typically takes 710 minutes, after which the results are scored based on accuracy and other characteristics.
Read more: http://www.minddisorders.com/A- Br/Bender-Gestalt-Test.html#b#ixzz2boZcrPEF 1. Philosophical approach Is based on a broad view of human nature as revealed by history, literature and general observation. Example: Study of Value Test, an inventory devised to measure the relative importance of 6 basic motives in an individuals personality: theoretical, economic, aesthetic, social, political and religious.
2. Factor Analysis Identifies a number of objectively measurable dimensions Two large groups of normal personality are identified. Hormetic traits The direct motivational aspects of personality and depend upon the physical needs of the body and the kinds of experiences the individual has had. Temperament traits Describe the manner in which the individual characteristically operates in certain areas, just as an aptitude tests tell how well one can be expected to perform with proper motivation and training. A self-inventory device that shows factors of temperament. Measures 10 traits of personality: ascendance, sociability, friendliness, thoughtfulness, personal relations, masculinity, objectivity, general activity, restraint and emotional stability. 300 descriptive statements respond by yes or no. Involves systematic, detailed and quantitative description of behavior of a single, individual. It is in depth analysis of an individual. Focuses on the quantitative relationship between two or more variables observed under the same existing conditions. This techniques is often more economical in terms of time, effort and expense than experimental research. Show the direction and magnitude of a relationship between variables, that is they can tell us whether two variables are related positively or negatively and to what degree. Examines the quantitative relationship between one or more conditions that are systematically varied and are expected to cause specific changes in peoples behavior. The major advantage of this method is that it can be used to determine definite cause and effect relationship. 1. Laboratory experiments 2. Field experiments 3. Natural experiments
The subject is brought into a laboratory setting and is subjected to conditions that are under the experimenters control. The subjects reaction to these conditions is recorded. It may be contrasted with the same persons behavior under different conditions or with the behavior of people who are brought into the laboratory and subjected to a different set of conditions. It permit the greatest control over the situation and are the easiest studies to replicate (the easiest way for the researcher to carry out exactly the same way) Introduce a change in a setting familiar to the subject, like the school or the home. Example: researchers conducting a field experiment might provide some preschool children with a special cognitive enrichment program and then compare these childrens progress with that of children not included in the program. Compares people who have been accidentally divided into separate groups by circumstances of life-one group which was exposed to some naturally occurring event and another group which was not. Not true experiments, because they do not attempt to manipulate behavior, but they provide a way of studying events that cannot be created artificially. Example: it would be unethically to separate identical twins at birth to do an interesting experiment; but if we discover identical twins who did happen to be separated at birth and raised in different circumstances, we can compare the effects of different environments on people with the same heredity. A. Case Study B. Naturalistic Observations C. Clinical Studies D. Interviews E. Correlational Studies Researchers observe and record peoples behavior in real-life settings(such as preschools or nursing homes) Researchers used this to gain normative information about the occurrence of certain behaviors. Example: time sampling, used to observed the occurrence of a particular type of behavior(such as aggression, babbling, or crying) at intervals throughout a given period of time.
Combines observation with flexible, individualized questioning. Differs from naturalistic observation in that the subject is not necessarily in a natural setting, and in that the researcher participates in the study situation. Piaget developed this method to find-out how children think. He explored individual childrens responses to his insight into the ways their minds worked. He discovered that a typical 4-year old believed that flowers or pennies were more numerous when arranged in a line than when heaped or piled up. This open-ended method is quite different from standardized testing techniques, which are intended to make the testing situation as similar as possible for all subjects. Instead of being observed, people are asked directly to state their attitudes and opinions or to relate aspects of their life histories. The problem relying on interviews alone for information is that the memory and the accuracy of the interviewers are often faulty. General Psycholgy 5 th edition. Josefina Gaerlan, Delia Limpingco and Geraldine Tria , pp. 189-191 Human Growth Development and Learning. Victorina O. Acero, Evelyn S. Javier and Herminisa O. Castro, pp.5-11
ROWENA S. DIVINAGRACIA MARYROSE ESPERANZA BEED-IVA Submitted by: