Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presented by
Ganesh Jayaraman
China’s Banking system
State controlled
Priority funding to State Owned Enerprises
(SOE)
High levels of NPA
Inefficient allocation of funds (preserve
employment)
Mckinsey (Nov 2006)– Potential to boost the
economy by USD 321 billion
Efficient
channel to transfer funds from
Government to the society
2
China’s Banking system
Minimal participation from Private Banks
Stronger Banks vis-à-vis Equity market
Higher level of savings in China’s banks
Lessons learnt from the 1997-98 Asian
crisis
RMB is not fully convertible – cross border
capital flow is limited
A very weak link to the mortgage backed
securities
Predictiveconnection between
performance and promotions
3
India’s Banking system
Nationalization of banks in late 60’s
75%of Banks assets owned by state
Compulsory priority sector lending
Indian banks invest 25% in Government
bonds – lend only 61% to the market
Inefficient allocation of funds (preserve
employment)
Mckinsey
(Nov 2006)– Potential to boost the
economy by USD 48 billion
Efficient
channel to transfer funds from
Government to the society
4
India’s Banking system
Low NPA’s (10.4% in 2001 to 3.5% in 2004)
- Banks well capitalized
Balanced growth in the financial sector –
between Banks, Equity market and Bonds
market
Due to Government borrowing – higher
cost of capital to corporate
Weak link to Mortgage backed securities
Informal lending worth 30% of formal
(Bank) lending
Highly regulated
5
China’s problems
Collapse in Global demand
Economy contracted significantly between 2008-H2
till 2009-H1
Trade crisis rather than Banking crisis
Risks:
Export
Value of $ reserve
Rescue not successful
Bad return on overseas investment
Confidence in economy
Choice:
Best use of the $ reserve
Maintain economic growth
6
India’s problems
Equity market - Huge dependence for
foreign funds
Dependence on export
Dependence on FDI
Liquidity crunch
Increase in petroleum prices in 2008
Cautious banks
7
China – what worked?
No dependence on International market for
domestic investment
Reforms were protected from political
pressure
US and India – Informed voters vs
uninformed voters
Fiscal
stimulus measures – Public
investment and Subsidy for agriculture
and some industries
Ready made plans were available
Huge surge in new lending – 50% of GDP in
H1 2009. 8
China – what worked?
Property price bubble and diversion to
speculation – only 60% loan
Focus on mass housing – sub-prime housing
market did not need sub-prime loans
Easy loans (flexible and negotiable) – “Get the
money out of the door”
Stimulus package reached the mass
Land was used to liquefy the system
Regulations (pension fund, ban on IPO etc)
Rate cuts – lending and deposit, reserve
requirements; scrap loan quotas
9
India – what worked?
Strong regulator
RBI Governor (Reddy) resisted pressure
to open up for capital account
transactions
Rate cuts
Lending rate cuts were slow
Smaller stimulus – due to bigger fiscal
deficit
Slow and steady helped in the long run?
Elections!
10
The road ahead?
Dependency on global economy
Stimulus package – Exit strategy?
Over-reliance on particular region
India – sluggish transmission of rate cuts
to consumers/corporates
India – tame the fiscal deficit
China – stock and bond market
China – effective regulator
11
Thank You
12