It is not possible to manage what you cannot control and you cannot control what you cannot measure! (Peter Drucker) 2 Presented by: Raghavee Goel (Roll no : 14) Shivangi Kejriwal (Roll no : 20) Shubham Aryan (Roll no : 21)
3 Introduction Performance measurement is a fundamental principle of management.
The measurement of performance is important because it identifies current performance gaps between current and desired performance and provides indication of progress towards closing the gaps.
Carefully selected key performance indicators identify precisely where to take action to improve performance.
4 Physical Asset Management To achieve this performance there are three inputs to be managed.
6 The Asset Reliability Process A proactive Asset Reliability Process, represented by the seven elements in the model aims to deliver the performance required by the enterprise to meet all of its corporate objectives.
1. Business focus 2. Work identification 3. Planning 4. Scheduling 5. Execution 6. Follow up 7. Performance analysis
7 8 Figure 3: The Asset Reliability Process identifies what's required to manage the maintenance function. KPI for the elements Element: Work Identification Work requests Proactive work
Element: Work Planning Amount of planned work Responsiveness of planning Quality of planning
9 Element: Work Scheduling Quality of Scheduling
Element: Work Execution Schedule compliance Quality of work execution Work order completion
Element: Follow-up Work order closure Presence of Performance Analysis Quality of Performance Analysis
10 KPI for maintenance Effectiveness (Result measures) 11 1. Maintenance Related Downtime: Useful key performance indicators associated with asset downtime attributable to maintenance are:
2. Maintenance costs: There are several useful maintenance cost related measures:
Maintenance Cost: The target maintenance cost depends on the asset and its operating context. Maintenance Cost / Replacement Asset Value of Plant and Equipment: This metric is a useful benchmark at a plant and corporate level. The world class benchmark is between 2% and 3%. Total Maintenance Cost / Total Manufacturing Cost: This metric is a useful benchmark at a plant and corporate level. The world class benchmark is <10% to 15%. Total Maintenance Cost /Total Sales: This metric is a useful benchmark at a plant and corporate level. The world class benchmark is between 6% and 8%. 12 13 3. Failures: Failure consequences are classified into the following categories:
Hidden Consequence : There is no direct consequence of a single point failure other than exposure to the increased risk of a multiple failure. Safety Consequence : A single point failure results in a loss of function or other damage which could injure or kill someone. Environmental Consequence: A single point failure results in a loss of function or other damage which breaches any known environmental standard or regulation Operational Consequence : A single point failure has a direct adverse effect on operational capability. Non-Operational Consequence : A single point failure involving only the cost of repair.
Case study: Scottish power To deliver the process safety management system, and specifically to establish a comprehensive set of leading and lagging process safety performance indicators, Scottish Power followed guidance in HSG254.
A multi-functional team from the business followed the six-stage approach in HSG254 to identify 90 hazards and the 42 risk control systems (or protective barriers) that are required to manage these hazards. The team then reviewed each risk control system to identify one or more leading indicators, crib sheets were used to capture detailed specification for each KPI.
In total 88 leading indicators were identified across all risk control systems. case-study-scottish-power.pdf 14
15 Advantages of KPI KPIs show an organization where it is going wrong, enabling management to make the necessary changes to turn things around.
KIPs give an organization an edge over its competitors. 16 Disadvantages KPIs can be expensive to use, or even impossible (you cannot quantify staff morale, for example)
KPIs have limitations to the exactness of results, which often may be a rough guide rather than a concentrate measurement.
Once designed, KPIs can be difficult to change unless you are prepared to disregard carefully built-up comparison yardsticks.
KPIs may be difficult to compare among peers- competitive analysis may be best left to an external specialist. 17 Bibliography Article: Key performance indicators Measuring and Managing the Maintenance Function, November 2005 written by Al Weber Reliability Consultant, Ivara