Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BC TEAL 2014
Richmond, BC
Overview
Introduction/rationale
Research questions
Study methodology
Results and discussion
Summary and Conclusions
Further research
1. Introduction
Purpose of the presentation
Report on a study of employers' perspectives on
writing inaccuracy of ESL employees and the
implications for academia.
2. Research Questions
1. What are the expectations of employers regarding writing
accuracy of ESL employees?
2. What language problems do employers believe ESL
employees have in work-related writing?
3. How might writing inaccuracy affect the career opportunities
and success of ESL employees?
Defining terms
Language problems include those in the following categories:
grammar, vocabulary
spelling, punctuation, upper/lower cases
Academic/professional writing style (Hu, 2011), avoiding
a. contracted forms, e.g., isnt
b. colloquial expressions
c. choppy sentences, i.e., Ss w/ < 10 words each, in a row
clear expressions
concise expressions
Grammatical
Accuracy
Pragmatic
Appropriateness
On 3 dimensions of grammar, see
Celce-Murcia & Larsen-Freeman (1999, p. 4).
Semantic
Clarity
3. Study Methodology
The study employed semi-structured indepth qualitative individual interviews with
ten managers and executives representing
six institutions in a small city and four
institutions in a metropolitan area in
Western Canada in 2012-2013.
Participants
Table 1: Administrators and executives interviewed
Participant Institution Type
Position
Gender
ESL Employees
Tourism
Manager
Female
Banking
Manager
Male
High tech
President
Male
Medical service
Director
Female
4+
High tech
HR Manager
Female
12
Law
HR Director
Female
20-25
Architecture
Managing Director
Female
Female
10
Education
Counseling
Associate Director
Male
High tech
IT Manager
Male
15+
Institution
Kinds of Writing
Tourism
High Tech 1
Medical service
High Tech 2
Law
Architecture
Consulting Serv
Ed Counseling
High Tech 3
1.2 What are your expectations or standards for their writing re. language
quality? Same for both ESL and NES employees?
Table 3
Part. Institution
Writing Expectations/Standards
Tourism
Banking
Medical
service
Law
1.3 Do you think writing correctly and clearly is important for success?
Table 4
Tourism
Banking
High Tech
1
Medical
Service
High Tech
2
Consulting
1.4 Do you think the ESL employees should write work-related English
with accuracy?
Table 5
Tourism
Law
Architecture
Consulting
services
High Tech
3
1.5 If you have/had ESL employees, is/was their ability to write English correctly
and clearly ever a problem for them and/or you?
Table 6
Part. Institution
Tourism
Medical
Service
Consulting
Services
Weve had to let people go because weve tried and tried and tried.
They had really good technical skills and we thought we could
teach them writing.
Education
Counseling
High Tech 3
Yes. Most of the errors are verbal; however, I have asked some
people to rewrite reports because of style issues, i.e. they didnt
write to the correct audience.
1.6 If you have/had ESL employees with writing problems, what types of
language problems do/did they have?
Table 7
Part. Institution Types of writing problems
B
Banking
High Tech 1
High Tech 2
Clear expressions.
Law
Education
Counseling
High Tech 3
1.7 Would you consider NOT hiring ESL employees in the future who make
frequent or systematic errors in English writing?
Table 8
Part. Institution
Tourism
Banking
High Tech 1
For certain jobs, yes, for public and website jobs. For
internal, technical jobs, I dont have an issue.
Medical
Service
High Tech 2
Law
1.8 What would you suggest universities and university instructors do re.
language errors in ESL student writing?
Table 9
Part. Institution Suggestions to universities
B
Banking
High Tech
1
employees
Research Question
Research Question
Research Question
6. Further Research
Future research will include surveys and more
interviews, ideally representing more varied
industries that hire ESL graduates.
Further research may also involve academia to
consider the possibility of implementing employers
suggestions.
THANKS
to Alana Hoare and Joel Heng Hartse for helping with the
research project.
Jim Hu
jhu@tru.ca
References
Beacon, L. (2001). Ethos and error: How business people react to errors. College Composition and
Communication, 53, 33-64.
Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher's course. Boston, MA:
Heinle & Heinle.
Hairston, M. (1981). Not all errors are created equal: Nonacademic readers in the professions respond to lapses
in usage. College English, 43, 794-806.
Ferris, D. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ferris, D. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of
Michigan Press.
Hoare, A., & Hu, (October, 2012). Transition into academics: ESL student preparedness and academic faculty
response. Paper presented at the TESL Canada Conference, Kamloops, BC, Canada.
Hoare, A. & Hu, J. (February, 2013). Best teaching practices for academic ESL students. Paper presented at the
Teaching Practice Colloquium, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, B.C., Canada.
Hu, J. (2000). The academic writing of Chinese graduate students in sciences and engineering processes and
challenges. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Hu, J. (2010). Faculty Perceptions of Chinese Graduate Students' Communication Challenges in the Science and
Engineering Disciplines. Canadian and International Education Journal, 39(3), 59- 80. Retrieved from
http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cie-eci/vol39/iss3/6.
Hu, J. (2011).Teaching ESL students to achieve academic writing style. Dimensions of Practice: Principled,
Progressive & Practical - Proceedings of the BC TEAL 2009 Interior Conference. Retrieved from
https://www.bcteal.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Compiled-Conference-Proceedings.pdf
Hyland, K. (2013). Faculty feedback: Perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing. Journal of Second
Language Writing, 22, 240-253.
Leonard, D.J. & Gilsdorf, J.W. (1990). Language in change: Academics and executives perceptions of usage
errors. Journal of Business Communication, 27,137-158.
Tamburri, R. (2014, May 21). Exit interview with Harriet Lewis: Yorks university secretary and general counsel
reflects on a challenging career. University Affairs. Retrieved from www.universityaffairs.ca