You are on page 1of 63

Process Safety, Health and

Environment (CN3135)

Soh Guat Hiong


chesgh@nus.edu.sg

Outline of CN3135
Importance of process safety design and
operation
Identifying safety and health hazards eg.
HAZOP
Predicting consequences
Design for sustainable processes eg. reliability
engineering, sustainable engineering

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

Module Learning Outcomes


On successful completion of this module, students
will be able to:
Describe and identify chemical process hazards
Analyze and assess the potential impacts of
hazards on safety, health, and the environment
(SHE)
Develop methods for controlling process hazards
and minimizing their associated risks.
Describe the principles and aims of sustainable
development
Prepare for final year design project
12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

Lectures and Tutorials Schedule


Week

Lecture Date Lecture Topic

Lecturer

Tutorial Date

Tutorial Topic

Tutor

Soh Guat Hiong

12-Aug

Introduction to Occupational
Health and Safety 1

Soh Guat Hiong

19-Aug

Fire and explosion 1

Ramasami Sundaresan

20-Aug

Introduction to
Occupational Health and
Safety 1

26-Aug

Fire and explosion 2

Ramasami Sundaresan

27-Aug

Fire and explosion 1

Ramasami Sundaresan

2-Sep

Consequence Modelling 1

Ramasami Sundaresan

3-Sep

Fire and explosion 2

Ramasami Sundaresan

9-Sep

Consequence Modelling 2

Ramasami Sundaresan

10-Sep

Consequence Modelling 1 Ramasami Sundaresan

16-Sep

Introduction to Occupational
Health and Safety 2

Soh Guat Hiong

17-Sep

NC Hor

1-Oct

Consequence Modelling 2 Ramasami Sundaresan


Introduction to
Occupational Health and
Safety 2
Soh Guat Hiong

Hazard Identification and Risk


Assessment Procedure (HAZOP) NC Hor

8-Oct

Pressure Relief

NC Hor

NC Hor

RECESS
7

30-Sep

7-Oct

Pressure Relief

14-Oct

Reliability Engineering 1

Leslie Tsen

15-Oct

Hazard Identification and


Risk Assessment
Procedure (HAZOP)

10

21-Oct

Reliability Engineering 2

Leslie Tsen

22-Oct

Reliability Engineering 1

Leslie Tsen

11

28-Oct

Management of SHE

Soh Guat Hiong

29-Oct

Reliability Engineering 2

Leslie Tsen

12

4-Nov

Environmental Impact

Soh Guat Hiong

5-Nov

Management of SHE

Soh Guat Hiong

13

11-Nov
16-Nov

Industry and Environment


Reading Week

Soh Guat Hiong

12-Nov

Environmental Impact

Soh Guat Hiong

Examinations

2 weeks

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

Tutorial Groups and Venue


CN3135 Tutorial
Group

12/8/2018

Day

Start

End

Venue

Wednesday

15:00

16:00

E5-03-22

Wednesday

9:00

10:00

E5-02-32

Wednesday

16:00

17:00

E5-03-22

Wednesday

11:00

12:00

E5-03-22

Wednesday

12:00

13:00

E5-03-22

Wednesday

17:00

18:00

E5-03-22

Wednesday

10:00

11:00

E5-02-32

Wednesday

14:00

15:00

E5-03-22

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

Tutorial Exercises
Will be assigned by individual
lecturers during each lecture

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

Module Assessment
Mid term test (date, topics, duration) 10%
HAZOP/ Reliability Engineering project 30%
Final Examination 60%

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

Textbook for CN3135


Chemical Process Safety:
Fundamentals with
Applications,
International Edition, 3/e

Author

: CROWL

LOUVAR
Publisher : Pearson
ISBN

12/8/2018

: 9780132782838

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

Expectations
IVLE/CN3135
Lecture materials - download
Tutorial problems Attempt
Register your project teams
o Form team of 4 5 members
o Register: IVLE/Workspace/Groups/Sign-up

Bring textbook for lecture

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

Lecture 1
Introduction to Loss
Prevention

Learning Outcomes
Review major process safety accident cases
Assess loss prevention in process design and
operation
Analyse incident statistics

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

11

Process Safety Focus


Prevention of incidents involving leaks, spills,
fires or explosions
Facilities are well designed, safely operated
and properly maintained
Facilities are designed and engineered
properly with systems to monitor and control
hazards
Includes technical, management and
operational systems working together to
achieve desired outcome
12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

12

Process Safety Pyramid

12/8/2018

Source: WSH Guidelines on Process Safety Performance Indicators, WSH Council

13

Source : The 100 Largest Losses, 1974-2013


12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

14

Source : The 100 Largest Losses, 1974-2013


12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

15

Major Process Safety Accidents

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

16

Video: Bhopal

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

17

Taiwan Gas Blast


Kaohsiung
31st August 2014
At least 25 fatalities and
270 injured

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

18

Major Process Safety Accidents

Fire at Shell Bukom


Fire had started in the course of open de-oiling of
naphtha from a pipeline that ran through a pump
house at the refinery
12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

19

Fire at Shell Bukom


Started 28th Sept 2011@ 1.15pm
Fire broke out in the pump room of Shell's halfa-million barrel per day Singapore plant
6 people suffered superficial wounds and 3 fire
engines were damaged from the fire
Damage was contained to the vicinity of the
pump-house, in an area 50m by 150m
Caused temporary shut down of refinery
Extinguished 29th Sept 2011 @9.18pm
Final handover by SCDF 2nd Oct 2011
12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

20

Shell was charged under Section 11(a) of the Workplace Safety and Health Act
(Chapter 354A) for having failed in its duty as an occupier to take reasonably
practicable measures to ensure the safety of persons at its workplace
12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

21

Worrying Trend Continues.


>30 Fatalities since Jan 2014 !!!

Source: SPH Website, 29 Jan 2014

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

22

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

23

Top 5 Incident Agents


Falls
Collapse/failure of structure/equipment
Struck by moving Objects
Caught in/between objects
Electrocution

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

24

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

25

Top 5 Occupational Disease


Noise induced deafness
Work-related musculoskeletal disorder
Occupational skin disease
Occupational lung disease
Barotrauma

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

26

Definitions
Safety: Strategy of accident prevention. Main emphasis is
on worker safety
Loss Prevention: Prevention of accidents through use of
appropriate technologies to identify and eliminate hazards
before an accident occurs. Includes protection of people,
equipment, production, property and the environment
Hazard: An inherent physical or chemical characteristic of a
material, system, process or plant that has the potential for
causing harm or damage
Risk: A measure of the likelihood of occurrence and
consequence of an accident (severity)
Accident: Incident which results in consequent losses

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

27

Definitions
Incident: An unplanned or undesired event
that adversely affects a companys work
operations
Include work-related fatalities, major injuries,
minor injuries, first aid cases, occupational
illnesses, property damage, spills, fires,
dangerous occurrences or near miss events

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

28

Accident Pyramid
1
100
500

10 000

Disabling Injury
Minor Injury

Property Damage

No Damage

Source: Chemical Process Safety, Crowl & Louvar


12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

29

VISION
ZERO

Zero Harm
12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

30

What is Acceptable
Risks?

Acceptable Risks
Any risk that is currently tolerated is considered
to be acceptable (US EPA)
Tolerable risk: risk which is accepted in a given
context based on the current values of society
(ISO & IEC)
Level of potential losses that a society or
community considers acceptable given existing
social, economic, political, cultural, technical
and environmental conditions (UN)

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

32

Acceptable Risks
Cannot eliminate risks totally
At design stage, need to decide if risks are
acceptable
< Normal day-to-day risks in non-industrial
environment
Risks from multiple exposures are additive

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

33

Acceptable Risks
Risk acceptance is a function of many factors
and varies considerably across industries
Company culture and the culture of the country
in which a facility is located influence risk
acceptability
Risk acceptability is also time dependent what is acceptable today may not be
acceptable tomorrow, next year or next decade

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

34

Severity of Hazard
Level

Score

Severity

Description

Catastrophic Fatality, fatal diseases or multiple major injuries


Major

Serious injuries or life-threatening occupational disease


(includes amputations, major fractures, multiple
injuries, occupational cancer, acute poisoning)

Moderate

Injury requiring medical treatment or ill-health leading


to disability (includes lacerations, burns, sprains, minor
fractures, dermatitis, deafness, work-related upper
limb disorders)

Minor
Negligible

Injury or ill-health requiring first-aid only (includes


minor cuts and bruises, irritation, ill-health with
temporary discomfort)
Not likely to cause injury or ill-health

Code of Practice on Risk Management


by Introduction
Workplace
safety and Health Council
NUS CN3135
to Loss
12/8/2018

Prevention

35

Likelihood of Occurrence
Level

Score

Likelihood

Rare

Remote

Occasional

Frequent

Description
Not expected to occur but still possible
Not likely to occur under normal
circumstances
Possible or known to occur

Common occurrence

Almost Certain Continual or repeating experience

Code of Practice on Risk Management by Workplace safety and Health Council


12/8/2018

36

Risk Ranking and Risk Matrix


Likelihood
Severity

Rare - 1

Remote - Occasional - Frequent - Almost Certain 2

Catastrophic - 5

10

15

20

25

Major - 4

12

16

20

Moderate - 3

12

15

Minor -2

10

Negligible - 1

Code of Practice on Risk Management by Workplace safety and Health Council

37

Acceptability of Risk Levels


Risk Level

Risk Acceptable

Low Risk (1 3)

Acceptable

Medium Risk (4 12)

Tolerable

High Risk (15-25)

Not acceptable

Code of Practice on Risk Management by Workplace safety and Health Council

38

Chemical Plant Accident


Accident
Type

Toxic
Release

Scenario

Release +
Dispersion

Probability
of
Occurrence

Potential
for
Fatalities

Toxic
Exposure to
employees
and
community

Low

High

Extensive plant
damage

Intermediate

Intermediate

High

Low to
Intermediate

Outcomes

Explosion

Ignition in
confined space

Fire

Release + Ignition Low to High


l Pre-mix with air? level of loss

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

39

Nature of Accident Process


Most common consequence is fire
Highest percentage of large losses from vapour cloud
explosion
Toxic release can result in high human and
environmental impact
Most frequent cause is mechanical failure (>50%),
followed by operator error (18%) and design (10%) *
Most common hardware failure piping systems,
reactors and storage tanks*
* Data from Chemical Process Safety by Crowl & Louvar

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

40

Sequence of Accidents
Initiation Event that starts the accident
Propagation Event(s) that maintain or
expand the accident
Termination Event(s) that stop the accident
or diminish it in size

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

41

Defeating the Accident Process


Step

Desired Effect

Procedure

Initiation

Diminish

Process design
Inert atmosphere
Intrinsically safe equipment
Grounding, bonding
Procedures, permit to work
Risk assessment
Training

Propagation

Diminish

Construction materials
Plant layout
Reduce inventories of
materials
Install check and emergency
shutoff valves
Emergency material transfer

Termination

Increase

Install check and emergency


shutoff valves
Fire fighting, sprinklers,
equipment & Procedure
42
Relief system

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss


Prevention

Inherent Safety
Minimise eg. inventory, size of tanks/reactors
Substitute eg. less toxic, less flammable
materials
Moderate eg. lower temperature, lower pressure,
dilution, particle size
Simplify eg. Design for Safety, less maintenance,
housekeeping, easy to follow. Reduce
opportunities for error

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

43

Hierarchy of Health Hazard Control

Source
12/8/2018

Path

Receiver

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

52

Bhopal Accident
Methyl isocyanate used in pesticide
manufacturing
Heavier than air
Reacts exothermically with water
Substitute with less hazardous chemical that
produce a less toxic chloroformate
intermediate (Substitute)
Decrease inventory of MIC on site (Minimise)

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

45

Video: Sugar Dust Explosion

Port Wentworth, Georgia

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

46

Port Wentworth Accident


Conveying equipment not designed to
minimise release of sugar dust and eliminate
all ignition sources (Minimise)
Poor housekeeping (Minimise, Simplify)
Company knows but fail to correct unsafe
condition (Company leadership issue)

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

47

Combustible Dust Explosion


Automobile Metal Parts Polishing Supplier, Kunshan

2nd August 2014


68 fatalities, about 190 injured

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

48

Shell Bukom Fire - 3 Main Lapses


1) Contractors drain naphtha from two open
valves and an open flange joint of the pipeline
into trays.
Naphtha vapour to escape into the atmosphere
resulting in an accumulation of flammable
vapour, which would in turn pose a danger of
ignition

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

49

Shell Bukom Fire - 3 Main Lapses


2) Use of a plastic tray, which was a nonconductive container, as a receptacle for
collection of naphtha
Free fall of naphtha onto the plastic tray allowed
accumulation of static charges
A spark could be caused and be sufficient to
ignite the naphtha vapour which is within
flammable range in the atmosphere

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

50

Shell Bukom Fire - 3 Main Lapses


3) Failed to deploy portable gas monitors
sufficiently close to the open de-oiling area to
give the warning when the build-up of the
flammable vapour reached an undesirable level

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

51

Performance Monitoring
Provide assurance that process safety risks are adequately
controlled

Leading Indicators - monitor proactively the effectiveness


of risk control systems and provide feedback on safety
performance before an incident or accident happens
- evaluate present state of workplace through routine and
systematic inspections
Lagging Indicators when desired safety outcome has
failed. Monitor reactively the effectiveness of risk control
systems, identify gaps and weaknesses in these systems,
and report on incidents or accidents

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

52

Source: WSH Guidelines on Process Safety Performance Indicators, WSH Council


12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

53

Examples of Leading Indicators

Source: WSH Guidelines on Process Safety Performance Indicators, WSH Council


12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

54

Examples of Leading Indicators

Source:
WSH Guidelines on Process Safety Performance Indicators, WSH Council
12/8/2018

55

Accident Statistics
Ministry of Manpower

Fatality Rate: per 100 000 employed persons

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

56

Accident Statistics
OSHA (Occupational Safety & Health
Administration)
# of injuries & Illness*200,000
Total hrs worked by all employees
Incidence rate per 100 worker years
40hrs 50wk
hr
WorkYear

2000

yr
wk yr

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

57

Accident Statistics
FAR (Fatal Accident Rate): Fatalities per
1000 employees over 50 years ( = 108 working hours)

Depends on no. of exposed hours


FAR = No. of Fatalities x 108
Total hrs worked by ALL
employees during period covered
[NB. 1 worker - 40 hr/wk, 50 wk/yr, and 50 exposed- yr/lifetime = 105 exposed-hr/lifetime]

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

58

Assessing Risks
Target FAR
For planning, design to meet national or
company requirements
Sum of risks for most exposed person on site
< 2 deaths/108 exposed-hr
Single risk < 0.4 deaths/108 exposed-hr

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

59

Accident Statistics
FR (Fatality Rate): per person per year
Independent of hours actually worked
FR = No. of fatalities per year
Total no. of people in
applicable population

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

60

Fatality Rate:
FR = no. of deaths x
frequency total population

Assessing Risks

Acceptability Criteria
10-3/yr
unacceptable
10-4/yr
public money spent to control
10-5/yr
some degree of inconvenience
10-6/yr
no great concern

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

61

Your Role in Loss Prevention


Eliminate the hazard
Mitigate the risk by reducing the
severity and probability of
occurrence of the incident

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

62

Tutorial Questions 20th Aug


Attempt problems 1-1, 1-2, 1-4
and 1-6 from textbook

12/8/2018

NUS CN3135 Introduction to Loss Prevention

63

You might also like