Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PREPARED BY JAWWAD
HUSSAIN
RESEARCH PROJECT 1
INTRODUCTION
Now a day, consumer use branded FMCG product
as compare to local FMCG. each product has its
own motivation to purchase. Brand element plays
an important role in the decision to purchase
FMCG. FMCG are those goods which is use for
short period of time such as daily, weekly,
monthly, yearly. Consumers make a number of
assumptions regarding different FMCG like frozen
food, spices, household appliances, cosmetics &
skin care products, surgical instruments, personal
care etc. it is found that consumer perceived
television commercials, print ads to purchase the
FMCG.
SPECIFIC PURPOSES
LITERATURE REVIEW
Many papers have been written national and international
level related to this topic of research. Some related
research are as follows.
Name of author
Research name
year
Factors Influencing
Purchase of FMCG by
Rural Consumers in
South India
2012
Firoozeh Fouladivanda,
Maryam Amini pashandi
JANUARY 2013
Name of author
Research name
year
Brand Influence on
Buying FMCG Products
in UAE
2013
Dr. Mohamed
Nasrudeen Dr.
Ramalingam. L.P
Buying Preference of
Rural Consumers
towards
Fast Moving Consumer
Goods
January 2014
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
DESIGN OF RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
causal- comparative research
Qualitative
Primary research
Random sampling technique
questionnaire
Statistic technique
POPULATION
The total population of Karachi is approximately
20,000,000
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
SAMPLE SIZE
The estimated verified sample size is 68.
RESEARCH TOOL
Primary data through questioner.
Research instrument is close ended
question.
statistical technique apply in this
research is
anova single factor analysis.
It is used to determine the variable
are affecting or not.
SUMMARY
Groups
Count
Sum
Average
Variance
Gender
68
118
1.735294
0.197542
V1 No of packet
68
214
3.147059
1.351185
V2 Brand impression
68
97
1.426471
0.248244
V3 Brand name
68
106
1.558824
1.593503
V4 Purchasing time
68
184
2.705882
0.479368
V5 PRICE
68
194
2.852941
0.903424
V6 Quantity
68
197
2.897059
0.720588
V7 Ingredient
68
239
3.514706
0.402766
V8 Quality (Taste)
68
96
1.411765
0.24583
V9 Quality (Colour)
68
131
1.926471
0.546752
68
102
1.5
0.313433
68
176
2.588235
1.43986
Brand name
Description
Number of
People
Percentage
Description
Number of
People
Percentag
e
International brand
40
59%
40
59%
National brand
28
41%
28
41%
Fragrance
Percentage
32%
68%
0
0
Description
Excellent
Good
Neutral
Bad
Number of People
13
27
0
0
Excellent
good
Neutral
bad
Number of People
19
21
0
0
Percentage
53%
47%
0%
0%
Very bad
Very bad
0%
Colour
Description
Spiciness
Excellent
Good
Neutral
Bad
Number of People
19
19
2
0
Percentage
48%
47%
5%
0%
Description
Number of People
15
23
2
0
Percentage
37%
58%
0%
0%
Very bad
0%
taste less
0%
CONCLUSION
The comparison of Shan Food Spice and National
Food Spice is resulted that shan food spice are
more batter than national food spice. Anova single
factor analysis is used in this research this analysis
resulted that all the variable are perfectly effect
the consumer purchase decision. The conclusion of
this research is that 59% respondent are attract
towards Shan Food Spice because of their quality,
ingredient, price, brand name, brand impartation,
and quantity. The findings also indicate that
respondent attracts towards brand element.