Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KASHMALA MUKHTIAR
ID NO:6440
shahzadkhan.lecturer@gmail.com
MAJOR PRESENTATION
INTRODUCTION- HUL
Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) is India's
largest FMCG company, touching the lives of two
out of three Indians with over 20 distinct
categories in home & personal care products and
food & beverages. They endow the company with
a scale of combined volumes of about 4 million
tonnes and sales of over Rs. 13,000 crores
HUL BRANDS IN
THE BATHING SOAP CATEGORY
LUX
Lifebuoy
Dove
Hamam
Pears
Liril
Breeze
Rexona
VISION STATEMENT
We help people around the world meet
everyday needs for nutrition, hygiene
and wellbeing, with brands that help
people look good, feel good and get
more out of life..
MISSION STATEMENT
INTRODUCTION-LUX
1960
LUX went
colored
1929
LUX launched
in India
1916
LUX launched
in USA as
Laundry soap
1925
LUX launched
in USA as
Toilet soap
SEGMENTATION
Gender- Female
POSITIONING
Over
INTERNAL ASSESSEMENT
The internal assessment is done by collecting
information from six ways .
Management
Marketing
Finance
Operations
Research and Development
Management information system
MANAGEMENT
MARKETING
Creating and building demand.
second-largest advertiser in the world.
long-standing social missions.
FINANCE
PRODUCTION/OPERATIONS
Improve performance
Developing an understanding
EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT
They
STRENGTHS
Brand image
Number of verities
Excellent marketing department
Assisted by a highly regarded
Marketing research unit
Financial backing
Large scale force
Effective and attractive packaging
The brand has innovative sale promotions tactics
WEAKNESS
OPPORTUNITIES
High rate of population growth.
People are becoming more conscious.
Innovation in unilever may creates opportunity to
more penetrate in the market.
Unilever Hindustan has opportunity to develop new
markets by identifying the needs of customer.
Products diversification would also help the brand
greatly .
Explore new markets.
THREATS
Possible increase of market share of pears etc.
Rising inflation.
Reduces personal disposable of consumer.
Their may be imitation of products in India which
may damage the goodwill of unilever Hindustan
limited.
Purchase the products of foreign companies
Local companies
Proposed Strategies
Concentric Diversification
Horizontal Diversification
Product Development
Forward Integration
Strength-S
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Weaknesses-W
Brand Image
1.
Number of Products
2.
Excellent marketing dept. & 3.
marketing research unit
4.
Financial Backing
ExperiencedTop
5.
Management
6.
Opportunities-O
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hygiene Consciousness
Increasing Population
Innovation (R&D)
Product Diversification
Explore New Market
SO Strategies
WO Strategies
Threat-T
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
ST Strategies
They must have
distribution channel
(S4,T3)
WT Strategies
their
S
P
A
C
E
M
A
T
R
I
X
ROI (35% )
Leverage (1414537)
Cash flow ( 137005)
Earnings per share (116.14)
Total
+2
+2
+4
+4
12
Technological changes
Rate of inflation
Competitive pressure
Barrier to entry into market
Total
Average
3
Average
-2.5
Competitive Advantage(CA)
Industry Strengths(IS)
Market share
Product Quality
Customer Loyalty
Technology know-how
Total
Average
-3
X-axis: -3+ 3.75 = +0.75
Y-axis: 3+ (-2.5) = +0.5
-4
-3
-3
-2
12
Growth potential
Profit Potential
Resource utilization
Financial stability
Total
Average
+3.75
-1.5
-2.0
-3.5
-3.0
-10
+3
+4
+4
+4
15
SPACE
MATRIX:
FS
Be +6
Conservativest +5
+4
+3
+2
Wor +1
st
CA
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1
-1
Aggressive
Product
development
Forward integration
Concentric
diversification
Horizontal
diversification
+1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6
Best-2
-3
Defensive
-4
-5
Worst-6
ES
Competitive
IS
Markte Share
40%
60%
Lux
Lu
x
Other
As
GE MATRIX OF LUX
Industry
Attractiveness
Strong
Average
Weak
High
Grow
Grow
Hold
Medium
Grow
Hold
Harvest
Low
Hold
Harvest
Harvest
Strategic Alternatives
Key Factors:
Weight
Product Dev
Con. Div
Forward Integ.
Horizontal Div
3
4
Fix
1
2
EXTERNAL FACTORS
Develop the product quality
Should have Own distribution channels
5
5
3
3
5
2
4
5
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
1
1
3
3
6
7
3
3
INTERNAL FACTOR
Consumer loyalty
2
38
2
29
1
40
50
Plan A
Plan B
Decision on the
basis of QSPM
From the analysis we conclude that
the company should choose
Product Development as Plan A
and if any problem lies in
implementation, they can go for
Horizontal Diversification
as Plan B.