Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Hedging Tools
Insurance
Derivatives
Derivatives
Derivatives
2. Insurance
Firms use insurance to protect against specific risks
fire, accidents, natural calamities
Insurance is a risk transfer mechanism
Insurance cannot be used to cover macroeconomic
risks
Buying insurance is not a Zero-NPV deal for the
insured because the premium charged by insurer
has to compensate for: 1. Losses on risk covered, 2.
Admin. costs 3. Adverse selection 4. Moral hazard 5.
Profit
When the costs related with 1, 2, 3 & 4 above are
large, insurance is an expensive tool of protection
9
2. Insurance
Most of the risks faced by the insurance cos. follow
a jump process (jump risks): a sudden strike of
hurricane & widespread damages, sudden terrorist
attack causing widespread loss of life & property
Insurers have started to protect themselves from
such large risks by issuing catastrophe bonds (Cat
Bonds)
These bonds are a means of sharing catastrophic
risks with investors
Payment on a Cat Bond depends on whether a
specified catastrophe occurs & how much is lost
10
15
16
21
23
24
27
1.122
- 1 0.1404 14.04%
1.10
31
32
34
35
36
4. Swaps
A. Interest rate swaps
B. Currency swaps
37
41
42
Year 0
Years 1-4
Year 5
USD EUR USD EUR USD EUR
10
-0.6
-10.6
-10
8 0.6 -0.4 10.6 -8.4
0
8
0 -0.4
0 -8.4
44
45
5. Setting Up a Hedge
A position in an asset can be hedged by using
derivatives: Futures or Options
Setting up a hedge with Futures corporate finance
perspective
Setting up a hedge with Options corporate finance
perspective
47
6. Caselet: Metallgesellschaft
In 1993 the MGRM, US subsidiary of German Co.
Metallgesellschaft issued its customers price guarantees on
gasoline, heating oil & diesel for up to 10 years. This way it
aggressively attracted sales.
It had sold > 150 million barrels of oils at prices 3-5 USD
higher than the prevailing spot prices.
It could not protect itself with futures contracts because for
such long years futures contracts do not exist.
So it bought a large no. of short dated futures contracts &
rolled them over at the end of their maturity
Since oil has +ve convenience yields generally, each time it
rolled over its futures it used to sell the maturing contracts at
a higher price than the price it had to pay for the new futures
53
6. Caselet: Metallgesellschaft
In 1993 oil suddenly started showing negative
convenience yields. So the maturing futures
contracts could be sold only at lower prices.
So MGRM had to pay higher to roll over its short
dated futures contracts
Since these oil futures were marked to market & oil
prices continued to fall in 1993, MGRM had to incur
huge marked-to-market losses and had to pay large
amounts in response to margin calls
The fall in oil prices indicated that its long term
forward contracts (guarantees) were appearing
profitable, but this was only in books.
54
6. Caselet: Metallgesellschaft
The BoD of the co. fired the CEO of its US subsidiary
& instructed it to cease all hedging activities & start
negotiating with its customers to cancel the long
term contracts.
Almost at the same time the fall in oil prices
reversed. If MGRM had held on to its long term
contracts then they would have earned huge profits
Discussion Questions:
Was the CEO wrong or the BoD wrong?
Whos mistake led to the massive losses?
55
8. International risks
A. Impact of interest rates on foreign exchange
rates
B. Impact of inflation rates on foreign exchange
rates
C. Relation between interest rates & inflation rates
D. Forward premium & changes in spot rates
E. Transaction exposure & Economic exposure
F. International investment decisions
59
1 rB
S
62
63
E (1 iB )
S
where E(S) & S are expressedas units of A per unit of B
66
67
69
S
S
Where both F & S are expressed in terms of A/B
71
73
Year
Cash
Flow
-1300
400
450
510
575
650
77