Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BST153
Coursework 2 Detailed Advice
Dr. Woon Sau Leung
Lecturer in Finance
LeungWS1@cardiff.ac.uk
Office Hr: Tues (2-4pm)
B04 Aberconway Building
Marking criteria:
You demonstrate the ability to conduct an empirical analysis in the
context of accounting and finance.
Reasonable structure and proper referencing styles.
You are able to use Eviews to perform data analysis and estimate
regressions.
You understand the theory behind the empirical tests and can
explain how the empirical analysis is testing the theory.
You are able to explain the findings in relation to the hypothesis
and the theory in detail and intuitively.
You are able to present the analysis and the results in an effective,
concise and neat way.
Make sure you cover both parts equally. So, plan carefully and
use wisely the space and words as you have 2500 word limit
(again, it is +/-10%).
Any other data, tests, or information that you feel are interesting and relevant
to the empirical tests.
Try to learn from academic papers the way they explain their
findings, i.e. in their empirical findings section.
Following prior literature, the banks fundamental variables we consider include those
relating to banks earnings (Basu, 1983; Cooper et al., 2003), non-interest income (Cooper
et al., 2003; Bessler et al., 2007), loan portfolio credit quality (Thakor, 1987; Wahlen, 1994;
Meeker and Gray, 1997; Jones et al., 2013), exposure to funding illiquidity risks
(Fahlenbrach et al., 2012; Acharya et al., 2013), equity risks (Anderson and Fraser, 2000;
Ang et al., 2006, 2009), turnover ratios (Chordia et al., 2001) and size (Banz, 1981; Gandhi
and Lustig, 2011).
On the theoretical side, a number of studies focus on while the linkage between and
has not yet been established.
Many more.