Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONTENTS
Introduction
Geomining Conditions
Experimental Investigation
Conclusions
INTRODUCTION
Fly ash generates from the coal based thermal power plant is of great
concern due to its disposal. Therefore proper utilization of the fly ash is
highly demanded.
overburden dump formed by mixing with 25% fly ash in opencast coal mine
at Raigarh, India along with field monitoring of such dumps for the first
time in India. It is observed that dumps with alternative layer of only fly ash
and overburden material are found to be stable with safety factor more than
1.2.
40 Million Tonne
1 Million Tonne
2008
FA Generation
FA Utilization
-----
2011-2012
FA Generation
FA Utilization
-----
2031-2032
FA Generation
---
1994
FA Generation
FA Utilization
UTILISATION
7
5%
6
12%
8
1%
1
47%
1 cement manufacturing
2 Cement substitution
3 Road embankments
4 Low lying area filling
5 Ash bund raising
6 Mine fill
4
10%
7 Brick manufacturing
3
9%
5
7%
GEOMINING CONDITIONS
Jindal Power Open Cast Coal Mine is captive mine of Jindals 1000
between Longitudes - 8329'40" to 8332'32" (E) and Latitude 2209'15" to 2205'44" (N) falling in the topo sheet number 64 N/12
(Survey of India).
CONTD
Jindal Power Open Cast Coal Mine is almost flat with small
Jindal Power Limited, Tamnar has already have captive thermal power
residue form due to the burning of coal, of nearly 16000 tons per day.
Therefore, quantity of fly ash generated requires large area for its
dumping.
5m
5m
SDMINER - 2014 June 20-Jue 22 2014 NEW
DELHI
11
12
13
14
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION
Various samples of overburden, soil and fly ash from the dump site were
supplied by the Jindal Power Limited for finding out various
geotechnical properties through the laboratory study. Different
geotechnical tests were conducted for the overburden and the fly ash
methods. The parameters like density, and shear parameters cohesion (C)
and angle of internal friction are determined for both overburden and fly
ash to analyze stability of dumped slope.
15
16
17
18
19
ANALYSIS
element program for geotechnical applications in which MohrColoumb models are used to simulate the behavior of dump
20
CONTD
21
CONTD
The trial- 2 was made for the dump prepared by alternate layer of
The Factor of Safety obtained was 1.78, and as it is more than 1.2.
This indicates that at the end the dump after dozing of top soil, the
dump satisfies the minimum requirement and can be used.
overburden and mixture of overburden and 25% fly ash along with
22
CONTD.
factor has increased to 1.78, which was only 1.32 with 8% fly ash
mixture with overburden. This increase may be attributed to the
was observed that on the application of 25% fly ash mixture safety
23
24
The height of dump at study site was about 25 m. Final stage dump
consist of 2 m top soil above the layers of OB and OB mixed fly ash
The 47 monitoring stations were installed with 1.0 m long pipes and
masonry pillars; 23 stations in the Pit 1 and 24 stations in Pit 2 and total
station was used for measuring RL of the stations.
material. Stability of Dump slopes was monitored with total station and
25
26
27
28
29
Pit-1
AS1, AS 2,
AS 3, AS
12, AS
13,AS14,
AS 15,
A16, AS
18,AS19,
AS 20,
AS21
Downward
Haphazard
displacement
displacement
Pit-1
Pit-2
Pit-1
Pit-2
AS4, AS 6, KJS 1, AS 5, AS KJS3
AS 7 , AS 9, KJS 4, 8, AS 11
, KJS
AS 10, AS KJS
5
17, AS 22, 11,
AS 23
KJS
12,
KJS
19,
KJS
23,
KJS 24
30
R.L. on 15.11.12
332.433
333.528
334.313
334.748
334.848
335.083
335.053
335.01
334.218
334.823
334.853
334.608
333.943
332.563
332.458
333.418
334.073
334.478
334.708
334.713
334.823
335.033
335.198
Vertical
R.L. on 31.03.13
Deformation - m
332.433
0
333.528
0
334.313
0
334.747
-0.001
334.843
-0.005
335.065
-0.018
335.038
-0.015
335.01
0
334.203
-0.015
334.807
-0.016
334.853
0
334.608
0
333.943
0
332.563
0
332.458
0
333.418
0
334.072
-0.001
334.478
0
334.708
0
334.713
0
334.823
0
335.031
-0.002
335.195
-0.003
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Pillar No.
AS1
AS2
AS3
AS4
AS5
AS6
AS7
AS8
AS9
AS10
AS11
AS12
AS13
AS14
AS15
AS16
AS17
AS18
AS19
AS20
AS21
AS22
AS23
31
Pillar No.
1 KJS1
KJS2
KJS3
KJS4
KJS5
KJS6
KJS7
KJS8
KJS9
KJS10
KJS11
KJS12
KJS13
KJS14
KJS15
KJS16
KJS17
KJS18
KJS19
KJS20
KJS21
KJS22
KJS23
KJS24
313.803
314.158
313.928
314.713
314.393
314.998
315.073
315.123
315.263
315.068
314.753
314.188
313.823
313.833
314.003
314.253
315.473
314.693
314.283
314.413
314.543
314.803
315.353
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
R.L. on 15.11.12
313.948
32
334.5
334
R.L. on 15.11.12
333.5
R.L. on 08.01.13
R.L. on 20.01.13
333
R.L. on 31.03.13
332.5
332
0
10
15
20
25
335
Monitoring Station
33
315.4
315.2
315
314.8
314.6
314.4
R.L. on 15.11.12
314.2
R.L. on 08.01.13
314
R.L. on 20.01.13
313.8
R.L. on 31.03.13
313.6
0
10
Monitoring Station
15
20
25
30
34
Pillar No.
AS1
AS2
AS3
AS4
AS5
AS6
AS7
AS8
AS9
AS10
AS11
AS12
AS13
AS14
AS15
AS16
AS17
AS18
AS19
AS20
AS21
AS22
AS23
0
0
0
-0.001
-0.005
-0.018
-0.015
0
-0.015
-0.016
0
0
0
0
0
0
-0.001
0
0
0
0
-0.002
-0.003
0
0
0
0
0
-0.001
-0.002
0
-0.002
-0.001
0.001
0
0
-0.001
0
-0.001
0
0
0
-0.002
0
0
0
Vertical Deformation
m
Nov12, June13
0
0
0
-0.001
-0.005
-0.019
-0.017
0
-0.017
-0.017
0.001
0
0
-0.001
0
-0.001
-0.001
0
0
-0.002
0
-0.002
-0.003
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
R.L. on 12.06.13
332.433
333.528
334.313
334.747
334.843
335.064
335.036
335.01
334.201
334.806
334.854
334.608
333.943
332.562
332.458
333.417
334.072
334.478
334.708
334.711
334.823
335.031
335.195
Vertical Deformation
m
March13 June13
35
Pillar No.
KJS1
KJS2
KJS3
KJS4
KJS5
KJS6
KJS7
KJS8
KJS9
KJS10
KJS11
KJS12
KJS13
KJS14
KJS15
KJS16
KJS17
KJS18
KJS19
KJS20
KJS21
KJS22
KJS23
KJS24
313.948
313.69
314.158
313.907
314.713
314.393
314.998
315.072
315.123
315.263
315.058
314.748
314.188
313.822
313.833
314.001
314.253
315.473
314.692
314.283
314.412
314.543
314.801
315.347
Vertical
Vertical
Deformation m
Deformation m
March13 June13 Nov12, June13
0
0
-0.02
0
0
0
0
0
0
-0.01
-0.005
0
0
0
0
0
0
-0.001
0
0
0
-0.002
-0.005
0
-0.001
0
0
0
-0.001
0
0
0
0
0
-0.001
0
-0.002
0
0
0
0
-0.001
0
0
-0.001
0
-0.021
0
0
0
-0.001
0
0
-0.01
-0.005
0
-0.001
0
-0.002
0
0
-0.001
0
-0.001
0
-0.002
-0.006
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
R.L. on
12.06.13
Vertical
Deformation m
Nov 12- March13
36
Gradual displacement
Haphazard
displaceme
nt
AS11
4.34
PIT-1
23
AS1,AS2,AS3,AS4,AS5,AS8,A
S12,AS13,AS15,AS17,AS18,A
S19,AS21,AS22,AS23(15 NOS)
65.23
AS6,AS7,AS9,AS10,A
S14,AS16,AS20(7
NOS)
30.43
PIT-2
23
73.91
26.09
TOTAL
NO OF
STATION
S
37
CONCLUSIONS
more than 1.2 for total height of the dump, Number of decks:
Height of individual deck, and Slope of each deck as 120 m, 4,: 30
m, and 32.
Dump form with alternate layer of overburden and mixture of fly ash
and overburden after dozing the top soil of nearly 2 m thick at the
with fly ash (only 25%) are found to be stable with safety factor
top, the slope also found stable with safety factor 1.78 for the above
geometry.
38
Overburden dumps with fly ash ensuring stability of the dump near
majority of the stations.
40
REFERENCES
(ICCEE'2012) that will take place on March 24-25, 2012 in Dubai (UAE).
Stability of Dump With 25% Fly Ash And 75% Overburden Materials
Related To JPOCCM MINE, JPL, unpublished report.
42