Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TITLE
SOURCE
AUTHOR
E. G. R. Solomon
KEYWORDS
Complete
denture impressions
Landmarks of edentulous jaw
Biological
considerations in
dentures
Mucostatics
complete
ABSTRACT
Professor
INTRODUCTION
Author accepts that nearly all publication on
this subject have an empirical base.
2. Hardly any research prove or disprove the
advantages of various impression techniques.
3. Standardized technique is not possible due to
many variable factors.
4. Impression materials are better classified
based on pressure applied at time of
impression.
1.
PRESSURE GROUP
Main objective - to attain better retention of the
denture.
The advocates of this group have worked towards
that end by incorporating a variety of mechanical
measures in their procedures
But not much regard given to the biological
aspect.
The Greens all compound technique which has
been described by Lieberthal1 is an example to it.
VARIATION IN TECHNIQUE
for
the
space
is
better
RELIEF OBTAINED BY
Scraping
ofscraped
If itEscape
is of plaster,
the
impression
itself
is
Holes
impression
on the hard areas whereas other
materials such
as compound or Zinc oxide-Eugenol paste require
relief on the cast.
MUSCLE TRIMMING
When
CRITICAL
EVALUATION
TITLE
Appropriate.
Conveys
AUTHOR
Institutional
mentioned.
KEYWORDS
Sufficient
ABSTRACT
No