You are on page 1of 32

1-1

WELCOME TO
MGT 631
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE SEMINAR
(1 Credit)

Session 1
By
Radhe S. Pradhan
Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1-2

CG Seminar 1 (Part I)
Radhe S. Pradhan & Som Nath Adhikari (2009),
Corporate Governance and Firm Performance
in Nepal, Management Review, Vol. 1, No.1, pp.
22-26.
The study reveals the existence of the
relationship between CG practices & firm
performance in Nepalese enterprises.
Among others, the companies conducting AGM
on time, financial statement submitted on time
& A Class auditor appointed in a firm, have
higher rates of return & higher MPS.
Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1-3

With the increase in % of institutional


ownership, public capital & public director, rates
of return & market price of share tends to
increase.
Similarly, with the increase in total assets, and
rate of return, MPS tends to increase, confirming
the size effect on CG.
However increase in leverage of the firm tends
to decrease in firms rates of return & MPS.

Questions
Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1-4

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1-5
Table 2 : Collection of data and number of observations
used in the Study

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1-6

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1-7

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1-8

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1-9

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 10

CG Seminar 1 (Part 2)
Shawgat S. Kutubi , Board of Directors Size,
Independence and Performance: An Analysis of
Private Commercial Banks in Bangladesh.
World Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 1. No. 4.
September 2011. Pp.159-178
This study examines the impact of board size
and independent directors on the performance
of local private commercial banks in
Bangladesh.

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 11

In Bangladesh, the listed companies board of


directors to select an independent director in
the board as at least one tenth (1/10), subject to
a minimum of one person.
The study included 28 (out of 30) commercial
banks operating in the private sector, which are
listed in the two stock exchanges of the
country.
In Bangladesh, under the Bank Companies Act
1991, Bangladesh Bank required the banking
firm to appoint the depositor director from the
depositors (Rule 2008).
Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 12

The model:
Dependent variable = a + b1 BS + b2 IF + b3 Size +
b4 Leverage +b5 NPL
Dependent variable: Performance measures
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on Asset (ROA)
Tobins Q:
Ratio of firm market to book value
measured by the book value of total assets
minus the book value of common equity plus
the market value of common equity divided by
the book value of total assets. (>1 is good).

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 13

Independent variables: Board Characteristics:


Board Size ( BS)
Ratio of Independent Directors( RID)
Control Variables:
ASSETS: The average total assets at the end
of each year.
LEVERAGE: Ratio of total debt plus equity to
the total assets at the end of each year.
NPL: Ratio of non-performing loan to total
loans
Table 3 descriptive statistics: Mean ROE is
0.1845, & Mean of ROA is 0.0149, Tobins Q
mean is 1.1068.
Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 14

On average, the BS of the banking sector is 12.99


i.e. 13 (Min 6.4 & Max 17.6).
Average ratio of independent directors is 0.0403
(min zero & max 0.1812).
A positive correlation exists between the ROE
and ROA with board size (BS) but not statistically
significant.
NPL is found negatively correlated with both
ROA & ROE.
Size is positively related to bank performance.\
The study concludes that the inclusion of
independent directors does affect the bank
performance in terms of ROE & ROA.
Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 15

Leverage is found to be positively related with


bank performance.
The coefficient of NPL is negative and
statistically significant. This implies that
increase in NPL leads to decrease in ROE of
banking firm.
Table 13: Multiple regression result shows that
BS, RID, Assets, Lratio affect positively on ROA,
but NPL has negative effect.
There is a positive relation between board size
and bank performance in terms of Tobins Q, but
no significant relation in terms of ROE and ROA.
Thanking you
Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 16

Hypothesis
H1: Bank board size is positively related to
their performance in terms of ROE, ROA, and
Tobins Q.
H2: The proportion of independent directors on
the board is positively related with banks
performance.

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 17

Variables and Statistics


Dependent variable = +1 BS + 2 ID+
3 Size + 4 leverage+ 5 NPL+ .

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics


Varia
bles

ROE

ROA

Tobin BS
sQ

1 - 18
RID Assets LVR NPL

Mean 0.185 0.015 1.107

12.99 0.04 523177 0.103 0.039


93690

Media 0.190 0.014 1.096


n

13.4

0.03 459522 0.093 0.037


31624

Std.
Dev.

0.069 0.007 0.056

2.69

0.04 319382 0.044 0.021


53696

MIN

0.002 0.001 1.032

6.4

MAX

0.326 0.041 1.267

17.6

0.18 194735 0.263 0.112


498758

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

268773 0.058 0.006


16778

All rights reserved.

Table 4:Pearson Pair-Wise Correlation


Matrix of the Variable

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

1 - 19

All rights reserved.

1 - 20

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 21

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 22

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 23

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 24

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 25

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 26

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 27

kutubi
Table 12: Anova.
Model

Sum of
squares

df

Mean
Sum of
Square

Sig

1 Regression

0.011

0.002

0.4

0.844(a)

Residual

0.121

22

0.005

Total

0.132

27

a) Predictors: (constant), NPL, Assets , BS, ratio , RID


b) Dependent Variable : ROE
Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 28

Coefficients
Model

Constant
BS

Unstandardized
coefficients
B
0.107

Standarized
coefficients

Sig

0.815

0.424

Std. Error
0.132

Beta

0.007

0.250

0.878

0.390

0.487

0.096

0.337

0.740

0.000

0.047

0.229

0.821

0.334

0.040

0.188

0.853

0.683

-0.202

-0.967

0.344

0.007

RID
Assets

0.164
0.000

Lratio
NPL

0.063
-0.661

a) Dependent Variable: ROE


Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

kutubi

1 - 29

Table 13: Anova.


Model

Sum of
squares

df

Mean
Sum of
Square

1 Regressi
on

0.000

0.000

Residua
l

0.001

22

0.000

Total

0.001

27

Sig

0.539 0.745(a)

a) Predictors: (constant), NPL, Assets , BS, Lratio , RID


b) Dependent Variable : ROA
Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

1 - 30

Coefficients
Model

Unstandardized
coefficients

Beta

Std. Error

Constant 0.005
BS
0.001

Standarized
coefficients

Sig

0.415

0.682

Beta

0.013
0.001

0.330

1.173

0.253

RID

0.026

0.046

0.160

0.571

0.574

Assets

0.000

0.000

0.004

0.019

0.985

Lratio

0.005

0.032

0.031

0.146

0.885

NPL

-0.066

0.065

-0.209

-1.018

0.320

a) Dependent Variable: ROA


Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

kutubi

1 - 31

Table 14: Anova.


Model

Sum of
squares

df

Mean
Sum of
Square

1 Regressi
on

0.023

0.005

Residua
l

0.062

22

0.003

Total

0.084

27

Sig

1.631 0.194(a)

a) Predictors: (constant), NPL, Assets , BS, Lratio , RID


b) Dependent Variable : Tobins Q
Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

All rights reserved.

Coefficients
Model

Unstandardized
coefficients

Standarized
coefficients

1 - 32

Sig

Std. Error
0.094

Beta

11.568

0.000

-0.002

0.005

-0.090

-0.352

0.728

RID

0.46

0.348

0.335

1.322

0.200

Assets

0.0

0.000

-0.126

-0.685

0.500

Lratio

0.010

0.238

0.008

0.043

0.966

NPL

0.890

0.488

0.339

1.823

0.082

Constant

Beta
1.088

BS

Copyright by R. S. Pradhan

a) Dependent Variable: Tobins Q

Thanking you

All rights reserved.

You might also like