Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Choices Made by
Households and Firms
part
II
Prepared by:
Fernando & Yvonn Quijano
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Households demand in output markets and supply labor and capital in input markets.
To simplify our analysis, we have not included the government and international sectors in
this circular flow diagram. These topics will be discussed in detail later.
2 of 35
3 of 35
4 of 35
Household Behavior
and Consumer Choice
Prepared by:
Fernando & Yvonn Quijano
Principles of Microeconomics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
5 of 35
Household Behavior
and Consumer Choice
6
CHAPTER OUTLINE
Household Choice in Output Markets
The Determinants of Household Demand
The Budget Constraint
The Basis of Choice: Utility
Diminishing Marginal Utility
Allocating Income to Maximize Utility
The Utility-Maximizing Rule
Diminishing Marginal Utility and
Downward-Sloping Demand
Income and Substitution Effects
The Income Effect
The Substitution Effect
Consumer Surplus
Household Choice in Input Markets
The Labor Supply Decision
The Price of Leisure
Income and Substitution Effects of a
Wage Change
Saving and Borrowing: Present
versus Future Consumption
A Review: Households in Output and
Input Markets
Appendix: Indifference Curves
6 of 35
2.
3.
7 of 35
8 of 35
Monthly
Rent
Other
Food Expenses
Total
Available
?
$ 400
$250
$350
$1,000
Yes
600
200
200
1,000
Yes
700
150
150
1,000
Yes
1,000
100
100
1,200
No
9 of 35
10 of 35
PXX + PYY = I,
where PX = the price of X, X = the quantity of X
consumed, PY = the price of Y, Y = the quantity
of Y consumed, and I = household income.
11 of 35
12 of 35
13 of 35
Total
Utility
Marginal
Utility
12
12
22
10
28
32
34
34
14 of 35
TABLE 6.3 Allocation of Fixed Expenditure per Week Between Two Alternatives
(1) Trips to Club
per Week
(3) Marginal
Utility (MU)
(5) Marginal
Utility per Dollar
(MU/P)
12
12
$3.00
4.0
22
10
3.00
3.3
28
3.00
2.0
32
3.00
1.3
5
6
34
34
2
0
3.00
3.00
0.7
0
(5) Marginal Utility
per Dollar
(MU/P)
(1) Basketball
Games per Week
(3) Marginal
Utility (MU)
1
2
21
33
21
12
$6.00
6.00
3.5
2.0
3
4
42
48
9
6
6.00
6.00
1.5
1.0
51
6.00
.5
51
6.00
15 of 35
utility-maximizing rule:
MU X
MU Y
16 of 35
17 of 35
18 of 35
19 of 35
For normal goods, the income and substitution effects work in the same direction. Higher
prices lead to a lower quantity demanded, and lower prices lead to a higher quantity
demanded.
20 of 35
Substitution and
Market Baskets
When we artificially restrict Ms.
Smiths ability to substitute goods,
we almost inevitably give her a
more expensive bundle.
21 of 35
22 of 35
23 of 35
24 of 35
25 of 35
When the substitution effect outweighs the income effect, the labor supply curve slopes
upward (a).
When the income effect outweighs the substitution effect, the result is a backwardbending
labor supply curve: The labor supply curve slopes downward (b).
26 of 35
Google: Is It Work
or Is It Leisure?
By providing many services
at the workplace, Google
has potentially affected the
trade-off people make
between work and leisure.
In the end, without increasing wages, Google may have
reduced the marginal utility of leisure and made people
more willing to work longer hours.
27 of 35
28 of 35
budget constraint
choice set or opportunity set
consumer surplus
cost-benefit analysis
diamond/water paradox
financial capital market
homogeneous products
income effect of a price
change
labor supply curve
29 of 35
APPENDIX
Appendix
INDIFFERENCE CURVES
ASSUMPTIONS
We base the following analysis on four assumptions:
1. We assume that this analysis is restricted to goods that yield
positive marginal utility, or, more simply, that more is better.
2. The marginal rate of substitution is defined as MUX/MUY, or
the ratio at which a household is willing to substitute X for Y. We
assume a diminishing marginal rate of substitution.
3. We assume that consumers have the ability to choose among
the combinations of goods and services available.
4. We assume that consumer choices are consistent with a simple
assumption of rationality.
30 of 35
APPENDIX
31 of 35
APPENDIX
MU X X ( MU Y Y )
MU X
Y
X
MU Y
The slope of an indifference
curve is the ratio of the marginal
utility of X to the marginal utility of
Y, and it is negative.
Principles of Microeconomics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
32 of 35
APPENDIX
CONSUMER CHOICE
At point B:
MU X
P
X
MU Y
PY
MU X MU Y
PX
PY
Principles of Microeconomics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster
33 of 35
APPENDIX
FIGURE 6A.4 Deriving a Demand Curve from Indifference Curves and Budget Constraint
Indifference curves are labeled i1, i2, and i3; budget constraints are shown by the three diagonal
2
lines from I/PY to I/PX1, I/PX2 and I/PX.3 Lowering the price of X from PX 1to PX and
then to swivels the
budget constraint to the right. At each price, there is a different utility-maximizing combination of X
and Y. Utility is maximized at point A on i1, point B on i2, and point C on i3. Plotting the three
prices against the quantities of X chosen results in a standard downward-sloping demand curve.
34 of 35
Indifference curve
Marginal rate of substitution
Preference map
35 of 35