Professional Documents
Culture Documents
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Agenda
4-3
SOP Functions
Marketing Planning
Resource
Planning
Operations
Financial
Planning
Demand
Management
MPC Boundary
Rough-Cut
Capacity
Planning
Master
Production
Scheduling (Mix)
Front End
4-4
SOP Fundamentals
Balance between supply and demand
SOP Communication
The plan must be expressed in terms
that are meaningful to nonmanufacturing executives
The operations portion of the plan
must be stated in terms that MPC
functions can use
Aggregate
value, etc.
4-6
Value of SOP
The SOP process provides visibility of the
interactions between sales, marketing,
production, and finance
Critical trade-off decisions are documented
Manufacturing performance is controlled in a
clear fashion
This leads to better integration among functional
areas and better response to the marketplace
4-7
SOP Process
End of
month
Statistical forecasts
Field sales worksheets
Management forecast
First-pass spreadsheets
Capacity constraints
Second-pass spreadsheets
Recommendations and
agenda
Decisions
and game
plan 4-8
4-9
SOP Discipline
For the SOP process to be routine
and effective, replanning must occur
when conditions indicate the need
Mechanisms for maintaining support
for the plans are important
Senior
executive involvement is a
minimum requirement
4-10
Communicating SOP
InformationDisplays
4-11
The display
includes both
history and the plan
Using a chase
strategy can lead to
large variations in
planned production
Financial results of
the plan are
calculated and
displayed
Planning
assumptions are
clearly displayed
4-12
Production Strategies
Chaseproduction output is changed
to match sales quantities
Levelproduction is constant, resulting
in inventory build-up and depletion
over time
Mixedcombination of chase and level
designed to result in acceptable levels
of flexibility and inventory
4-13
Chase Strategy
Chase Strategy
Demand forecast
Chase
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
4-15
Level Strategy
Level Strategy
Demand forecast
Level
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
4-17
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
4-18
4-19
4-20
4-21
Month
Expected Demand
Jan
900
22
41
Feb
700
18
39
Mar
800
21
38
Apr
1,200
21
57
May
1,500
22
68
June
1,100
20
55
6,200
124
Table 13.2
4-22
70
60
50
40
30
0
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
22
Figure 13.3
18
21
21
22
20
= Month
= Number of
working days
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
4-23
Table 13.3
Pla
f o rce
k
r
o
w
tant
s
n
o
c
n1
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
4-24
Cost Information
Production
Jan
22 cost per unit 1,100
Subcontracting
Feb
18
900
Average
pay rate
Mar
21
1,050
Overtime pay rate
Apr
21
1,050
Labor-hours
to
May
22produce a unit1,100
Monthly
Demand Inventory
Ending
Forecast
Inventory
$ 5 perChange
unit per month
900
200
$20 per +200
unit
700
$10 per +200
hour ($80 per400
day)
800
650
$17 per +250
hour
8 hours per 500
day)
1,200 (above-150
1.6 hours
per unit
1,500
-400
$300 per-100
unit
Cost
Juneof increasing
20 daily production
1,000 rate1,100
(hiring and training)
Cost of decreasing daily production rate
(layoffs)
100
0
1,850
1
Plan
Workforce required to produce 50 units per day = 10 workers
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
4-25
Cost Information
Costs
Production
per
unit)
900
$20
per +200
unit
Jan
22 cost per unit 1,100
Subcontracting
Feb
18labor
900
Regular-time
99,200
Average
pay rate
Mar
21
1,050
Overtime pay rate
Other
(overtime,
Apr costs 21
1,050
hiring, layoffs,
Labor-hours
to
May
22produce a unit1,100
subcontracting)
200
400
(=700
10
$80per
per
$10workers
per +200
hour x($80
day)
day
x 124hour
days)
800
650
$17 per +250
$300 per-100
unit
Cost
Juneof increasing
20 daily production
1,000 rate1,100
(hiring
and training)
Total
cost
$108,450
Cost of decreasing daily production rate
(layoffs)
0
1,850
1
Plan
Workforce required to produce 50 units per day = 10 workers
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
4-26
6,000
Reduction
of inventory
5,000
4,000
3,000
6,200 units
Cumulative level
production using
average monthly
forecast
requirements
2,000
1,000
Cumulative forecast
requirements
Excess inventory
Jan
Figure 13.4
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
4-27
Month
Expected Demand
Jan
900
22
41
Feb
700
18
39
Mar
800
21
38
Apr
1,200
21
57
May
1,500
22
68
June
1,100
20
55
6,200
124
sub
2
n
a
Pl
tin g
c
a
r
t
n
co
Table 13.2
4-28
70
60
Level production
using lowest
monthly forecast
demand
50
40
30
0
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
22
18
21
21
22
20
= Month
= Number of
working days
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
4-29
Table 13.3
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
4-30
In-housecost
production
Subcontracting
per unit
Average pay rate
Overtime pay rate
= 38$10units
per day
per unit
x $124
5 perdays
hour ($40 per day)
$ 7 perunits
hour
= 4,712
(above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours
to produce a unit
Subcontract
units
1.6 hours
per unit
= 6,200
- 4,712
$300 per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate
=
1,488
units
(hiring and training)
Cost of decreasing daily production rate
(layoffs)
Table 13.3
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
4-31
In-housecost
production
Subcontracting
per unit
Average pay rate
Overtime pay rate
= 38$10units
per day
per unit
x $124
5 perdays
hour ($40 per day)
$ 7 perunits
hour
= 4,712
(above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours
to produce a unit
Costs Subcontract
units
1.6 hours
per unit
= Calculations
6,200
- 4,712
$300
per unit x $80 per
Cost
of increasing
daily production
rate
Regular-time
labor
$75,392
(=
7.6 workers
=
1,488
units
(hiring and training)
Total cost
$105,152
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
4-32
Month
Expected Demand
Jan
900
22
41
Feb
700
18
39
Mar
800
21
38
Apr
1,200
21
57
May
1,500
22
68
June
1,100
20
55
6,200
124
iring
h
3
Plan
ffs
o
y
a
l
d
an
Table 13.2
4-33
70
60
50
40
30
0
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
22
18
21
21
22
20
= Month
= Number of
working days
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
4-34
Table 13.3
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
4-35
Cost Information
Extra Cost$of
5 perExtra
unitCost
perofmonth
Increasing
Decreasing
Production
Production
$10 per(layoff
unitcost) Total Cost
(hiring cost)
41
$ 14,400
$ 5 per hour
day)
($40 per
$ 14,400
Feb
700
Overtime
pay rate39
11,200
$ 7 per hour
$1,200
12,400
(= 28xhours
$600) per day)
(above
Mar
800 to produce
38
Labor-hours
a 12,800
unit
$600
1.6 hours
per
unit
(= 1 x
$600)
Average
pay
Jan
900 rate
13,400
Cost
of increasing
daily production
rate
$5,700 $300 per unit
Apr
1,200
57
19,200
(= 19 x $300)
(hiring and training)
24,900
Cost
rate
(= 11 x $300)
(layoffs)
24,300
June
1,100
Table 13.3
55
17,600
$7,800
(= 13 x $600)
25,400
$99,200
$9,000
$9,600
$117,800
Table 13.4
4-36
Plan 1
Plan 2
Inventory carrying
$ 9,250
Regular labor
99,200
75,392
99,200
Overtime labor
Hiring
9,000
Layoffs
9,600
Subcontracting
29,760
$108,450
$105,152
$117,800
Total cost
Plan 3
$
Table 13.5
4-37
Mathematical Approaches
Useful for generating strategies
Transportation Method of Linear
Programming
Produces an optimal plan
Other Models
Linear Decision Rule
Simulation
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
4-38
4-39
Other Models
Linear Decision Rule
Simulation
4-40
Summary of Aggregate
Planning Methods
Techniques
Graphical
methods
Solution
Approaches
Trial and
error
Transportation
Optimization
method of linear
programming
Important Aspects
Simple to understand and
easy to use. Many
solutions; one chosen
may not be optimal.
LP software available;
permits sensitivity
analysis and new
constraints; linear
functions may not be
realistic.
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Table 13.8
4-41
Summary of Aggregate
Planning Methods
Techniques
Solution
Approaches
Important Aspects
Management
coefficients
model
Heuristic
Simulation
Change
parameters
Table 13.8
4-42
Management Obligations
4-43
Functional Roles
4-44
4-45
Integrated Planning
Manufacturings
Strategic Planning
A direction-setting activity
Can
be an extension of budgeting
More recently, plan is based on
products and markets rather than
organizational units
SOP must support strategic plans
4-47
The
Key issues
When
4-48
Principles
The operations plan isnt a forecast. It is a
statement of desired production output.
The operations plan is included in the SOP process
to maintain agreement with other functional plans.
Trade-offs required to frame the operations plan
must be made prior to final approval
Top management involvement is imperative in the
SOP process. The SOP process should relate
directly to the strategic plan.
4-49
Principles
The MPC system should be used to
perform routine activities and provide
routine data, allowing management time to
be devoted to important tasks.
The MPC system should facilitate what-if
analysis at the SOP level.
Reviews of performance against SOP are
needed to prompt replanning when
necessary.
4-50
QuizChapter 4