Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Critics of active policy emphasize that policy affects the economy with a lag
and our ability to forecast future economic conditions is poor, both of which
can lead to policy being destabilizing.
Advocates of rules for monetary policy argue that discretionary policy can
suffer from incompetence, abuse of power, and time inconsistency.
Critics of rules for monetary policy argue that discretionary policy is more
flexible in responding to economic circumstances.
Advocates of reducing the government debt argue that the debt imposes a
burden on future generations by raising their taxes and lowering their
incomes.
Critics of reducing the government debt argue that the debt is only one
small piece of fiscal policy.
Advocates of tax incentives for saving point out that our society discourages
saving in many ways such as taxing income from capital and reducing
benefits for those who have accumulated wealth.
Lecture 29
Lecture Outline
1. Economic eras
65 years of development
Achievements
Considerable economic growth and development
Significant leaps were made in industrial and agriculture production
Model Capitalist Economy
High growth rate in manufacturing sector
Increase in exports
Progress in agriculture sector
Policy Failures
Increased disparities in incomes
Achievements
Foundations for future growth and development
Basic industries were setup
Base for a capital goods industry
Middle East boom
Illiberal economic policies
Foreign exchange earnings doubled because of devaluation
Failures
Events beyond control affected economic program of this era
Downward trend in growth
Nationalization
Cotton crops failure and floods affected Pakistans exports
Crisis in balance of payments
Devaluation of Pakistani rupee
Achievements
Policy Failures
Achievements
Return of democracy
Era of structural adjustment
Economic liberalization and stabilization
Privatization
Reduction in tariff rates to increase exports
Policy Failures
Macro economic crisis
High taxation
Low spending in social sectors
Trade reforms resulted in deindustrialization
Continuous devaluation in the Pakistani rupee
Increased in the administrated prices of utilities
High inflation rate
Unemployment
Privatization without proper policy
Loss of sovereignty for the Pakistani state and its people
Economic Situation:1998-2004
Features
Acceleration in economic growth
Increase in industrial production
Rise in exports earnings
Strong upsurge in investment
Pre-payment of high cost external debt
Increase in foreign exchange reserve
Strategic re-entry into the international capital markets
Increase in spending on Education
Increase in FDI
2005-2007
The economy picked up further in FY2005,
-with GDP growth coming in at over 8.4% for the first time in 8 years.
With sound macroeconomic fundamentals achieved and key sectors
strengthened by reforms implemented in the 4-5 years,
the economy was well positioned to sustain 7% or more growth in the medium
term.
200607
200708
200809
200910
201011
Agricult 0.92
ure
0.23
0.86
0.13
0.26
Industry 2.28
0.38
-0.03
2.09
-0.02
Manufa 1.55
cturing
0.92
-0.69
1.01
0.55
Service 3.61
s
3.08
0.89
1.54
2.15
Real
GDP
(FC)
3.68
1.72
3.76
2.39
6.81
Structural Change
Modern economics has given clear evidence that changes in
levels of some basic magnitudes are generally associated with
changes in composition, which imply STRUCTURAL CHANGE
Structural Changes
Pakistan today is less than half of the country it was in 1947. The contribution made
by East Pakistan to Pakistans society and economy was huge.
Pakistan is basically an agricultural country is no longer true. The services sector has
replaced agriculture as the dominant sector of the economy, contributing almost half
of GDP.
Population (millions)
1951
1997
2011
33.78
140
180.72
53.2
24.2
21
7.8
26.4
12
39.0
49.4
67
Contribution to GDP by
sector(%)
i.
ii.
iii.
Agriculture
Manufacturing
Others
Restore confidence
Recommended Books